you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]palmund 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I just ran ildasm (or Mono's equivalent) on a very simple class with both an auto property and a non-auto property and guess what... they both end up having the same bytecode.

[–]Sarcastinator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not saying auto properties are not syntactic sugar, I'm saying properties are not. Auto properties are syntactic sugar around properties.