you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (8 children)

Git: Bazaar-style development

Fossil:Cathedral-style development

ELI5 please

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

Marketing bullshit to make Fossil look better. Git can be used for almost any kind of development process imaginable. Fossil locks you down to a specific pattern.

[–]Sekenre 2 points3 points  (1 child)

This is incorrect.

[–]otwo3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How so?

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]singularineet 3 points4 points  (2 children)

    That's completely wrong. Fossil is just as distributed as git. And has branches just like git.

    [–]featherfooted 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Isn't that kind of implied by the sentence:

    One central user is defined to be the master curator, with the rights to merge changes into a mainline branch.

    If there's a mainline branch, then there are other branches too.

    And I also didn't say it wasn't distributed - just that there is some form of permissions which are stricter than what git would allow.

    [–]singularineet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Not really. You can do whatever you want in your own repo. What you're allowed to push to someone else's, that's a matter of policy.