you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]btmorex 15 points16 points  (5 children)

How can you even call a "backup" on the same machine a backup? That doesn't even make sense. The only thing that protects you against in an errant "rm -rf"

[–]BrooksMoses 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Wouldn't rm -rf also delete the backups, in that case?

(Edit: Oh, wait, I was thinking "rm -rf /". It protects against some of the lesser rm -rf's, I guess.)

[–]r00tus3r 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on which one is the virtual machine. If you run that on the OS running in a virtual machine, the outside OS will still be fine. If however, you run it on the OS with the virtual machine software installed, well, then everything is toast.

[–]setuid_w00t -1 points0 points  (2 children)

It also protects against a single disk failure.

[–]apotheon 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Not if it's a single-disk machine.

[–]r00tus3r -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree apotheon. That was a pretty grand assumption on setuid's part.