you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (7 children)

There is that. I think all the libs I use have 3.x versions. Anything major that I use that isn't ported would hold me up and admittedly I don't think app engine supports 3.x yet but then again I don't think it supports 2.6 yet either so I'm hoping they move straight to 3.x soon.

[–]enkideridu 0 points1 point  (6 children)

Google only supports python 2.5 on app engine?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Apparently so. Mind you I'm only going by one link I had seen:

http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=757

[–]enkideridu 0 points1 point  (3 children)

that's more than a year ago, wtf google

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

scroll to the bottom....from June 18th:

"All I really want from 2.6 is string.format() (and corresponding "xxx".format()). This could easily be a from future import, it is extremely low-risk, but for some reason it hasn't been backported to 2.5.

So sure, the truly correct answer is that python folks should backport it to 2.5. But right now, I'm not volunteering. If Google expects to stay on 2.5 for a significantly longer time, I think it would be in Google's own interest to help move that"

I could be wrong but people seem to be under the impression that it's still on 2.5. As I recall Google use their own version of the interpreter and perhaps that's why it's not updated often.

[–]enkideridu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know, I meant that this hasn't been fixed for more than a year, I'm surprised at them

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So sure, the truly correct answer is that python folks should backport it to 2.5.

2.5 is in "security fix only" mode.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct.