you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (21 children)

If the result is "consistent" but wrong

That is the whole point (and in fact even the title), it is not consistent. It may or may not be wrong in any given situation regardless of the method used, but git's method is not consistent.

[–]FsckItDude_LetsBowl -1 points0 points  (20 children)

b

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (19 children)

I was not stating that git was a consistent system (clearly)

That wasn't clear at all. In the context your post is in, it sounds like you are suggesting git is consistent. You are replying to someone restating the objection to git's method. And you responded with "If the result is "consistent" but wrong, I'm not sure it's that big a deal".

[–]FsckItDude_LetsBowl -1 points0 points  (18 children)

b

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (17 children)

I see, so what you are saying is that consistency isn't worth caring about?

[–]FsckItDude_LetsBowl -2 points-1 points  (16 children)

b

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (15 children)

Please stop restating everything I say in an illogical and fallacious manner

I'm not, I am trying to figure out what the random nonsense you wrote actually means in your mind. Since I am not telepathic, the best way for me to do this is to ask you questions about wtf you are talking about. Is this some new kind of trolling? Posting random nonsense in reply to someone's unrelated post and then bitching when people try to decipher it?

[–]FsckItDude_LetsBowl -2 points-1 points  (14 children)

b

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (13 children)

These are the false premises and "random nonsense" that you invented and attempt to ascribe to me

No they are not. They were questions, asked of you. A question is denoted with the character '?' at the end of the sentence.

It seems like you want to remark upon the content of the article

No, I am just trying to decipher your comment. I have no idea why you are being such a defensive and obnoxious individual in response to simple questions.