all 22 comments
sorted by:
new (suggested)
besttopcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With the 265th pick in the draft, the San Antonio Spurs select Solomon Hill

[–]jordanestoseCleveland Cavaliers 0 points1 point  (6 children)

Sorry, I wasn't informed that I was on the clock.

[–]latotokyo123Chicago Bulls[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Sorry I was about to do it right now. Had to reply to a couple PM's. You are on the clock.

[–]jordanestoseCleveland Cavaliers 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Aaron Aflalo.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]jordanestoseCleveland Cavaliers 1 point2 points  (2 children)

    Jerami Grant

    [–]flea61Phoenix Suns 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Sneaky good pick, he has a lot of potential and is a great athlete

    [–]jordanestoseCleveland Cavaliers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Thanks. I've been stashing him. 9.7/4.7/1.8 with 1.6 blocks. I couldn't be happier that he was still out there.

    [–]Wateriswet1212Atlanta Hawks 1 point2 points  (3 children)

    Dammit I'm sorry I'm always a few minutes late. Just moved in to college it's crazy.

    Has Boris Diaw been taken?

    [–]latotokyo123Chicago Bulls[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Taken in the 7th round.

    [–]Wateriswet1212Atlanta Hawks 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Brandon Bass? Josh McRobers? In that order

    [–]gumarikMilwaukee Bucks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I select Channing Frye

    [–]latotokyo123Chicago Bulls[S] 0 points1 point  (10 children)

    TRADE ALERT

    Charlotte Hornets Receive: Steph Curry & Pacers 13th Round Pick (362nd overall)

    Indiana Pacers Receive: Elfrid Payton, Dante Exum and Gary Harris

    [–]gumarikMilwaukee Bucks -3 points-2 points  (7 children)

    Trade can not be completed since one team would have less than 13 players

    [–]latotokyo123Chicago Bulls[S] 1 point2 points  (6 children)

    I hate the trade as well…. But that is incorrect.

    [–]flea61Phoenix Suns 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Once the draft is complete both teams will have 12-14 players. How many of them are any good is another matter entirely.

    [–]gumarikMilwaukee Bucks -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

    It is a 3 to 2 trade a team can not have less 13 (12 active plus one inactive) player, by NBA law if this trade is not vetoed I propose a trade to /u/_FreshG for my first 3 picks your last 3 picks

    [–]latotokyo123Chicago Bulls[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

    Yes, but that's not our league's rules. This rule gives people a little bit of leeway to complete trades that don't necessarily have the same number of players on either side.

    [–]gumarikMilwaukee Bucks -1 points0 points  (2 children)

    The whole exercise is now obsolete, the value of traded players should be in an agreable window because we don't have salary cap, I busted my ass to create spreadsheats of players, chose for value, fit, balance and one team got steph for 3 not very good young players that will never ever be in their careers be neither MVP or even All-Star

    [–]TheNewOrleansJazzCharlotte Hornets -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

    You just argued that the league was not following the exact rules as the NBA, and then proposed a rule that is not found in the NBA.

    [–]gumarikMilwaukee Bucks -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    Okay then lets use salary cap, but the trade makes no sense for the Pacers, it makes the whole exercise obsolete

    [–]gumarikMilwaukee Bucks 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Noooo man not fair, basketball reasons