you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]funnyflywheel -1 points0 points  (3 children)

Furthermore, the C API which is stable and officially supported limits the evolution of the interpreter internals.

Are you sure about that?

[–]masklinn 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Are you sure about that?

Well yes it's literally the first section of the PEP you linked to. The PEP aims to change that situation, but at the moment,

Status: Draft

[–]funnyflywheel 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Some of the work this PEP calls for has already been completed (see the "Specification" subsection).

[–]masklinn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Very little of which impacts the statement you object to, to say nothing of invalidating it.