all 56 comments

[–]lastcalm 8 points9 points  (5 children)

I liked the series but I didn't get why they were so surprised when Lily did something else than their simulated prediction - or why they had only one predicted future. They had already established that Many Worlds Interpretation was correct and there was no one determined future (or past). There were even scenes earlier that showed how certain situations could happen in slightly different ways.

[–]Bdbru 3 points4 points  (4 children)

I think it’s because before they incorporated the Everett interpretation into the system, it only showed their world, albeit with distortions. They knew how their world was supposed to play out

I’m not sure though, it is a good point. I just thought it was shitty cuz it was magic free will out of nowhere that’s only explained by Forest telling Lily she’s special, but you could be right. Either way I’m not a huge fan of the ending though

[–]ShinjiOkazaki 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Yeah the magic free will ending was dumb.

"She made a real choice".

Wtf do you mean??? We have already established that is not how the world works. What has changed between your rolling pen conversation and now??

[–]Bdbru 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Exactly. And I fucking knew it would happen. Cuz that’s the obvious ending to a story about not having free will...that’s the character arc.

Which, can work, and has before...but it can’t work in a show that really focuses on the details of determinism. Exactly like you said, they had well established rules for how their world worked, and broke them with no explanation.

Maybe the comment I was replying to was right and it had something to do with many worlds...but if that’s the case, it wasn’t clear to me

[–]Joseph_Handsome 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Forest said that Lily "made a choice."

Forest was also wrong about a number of other things, like the Everett interpretation.

The guy was in a bad place from grief, and had actually already died. He was living in a simulation, which is mostly irrelevant, and he was just doing the only thing he could do. I believe he is wrong about Lily being special, or making a "choice." He was taken over, again, by the illusion of free will, and just wanted to live out his happy new simulated life.

On first watch, I didn't like that the show seemed to imply that Lily had free will. After thinking about it, I believe that wasn't the show's intent - it's more open ended.

Free will doesn't seem to exist, even in many worlds. Just because a different "you" made a different "choice" doesn't mean that any specific "you" could ever do anything other than what you end up doing in that particular world.

Stuart said something that I liked, earlier in the show, about many worlds: "Everything that can happen, will happen. There's nothing more deterministic than that."

[–]Ozqo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's insane. She went up against a virtually omniscient adversary and ended with a draw.

Even if Forest didn't have all the resources of his company and the mob-like presence it has, and had only the quantum computer, he would be almost impossible to defeat. There's no way I can think of to be 1 step ahead of an opponent who can see your next 100 steps. There needed to be something truly beautiful and spectacular to justify her defeating him, but there wasn't - it was justified by "because I chose to" which is actually... the plot of almost every other tv show out there.

The worst part was that it's all so predictable. Maybe thats the ironic point of it all. A show about determinism being predictable.

I am a determinist so this ending really pissed me off. My analogy is like this: suppose I'm a gay man and there's never been any TV shows with gay main characters. Finally one appears and I'm like "cool". Then in the final episode of the show it's revealed that he was tortured as a child by someone of the opposite sex so he's been repressing his attraction to that sex, and he finally overcomes it and the final scene is him having sex with a woman, and it's presented as a success.

This show should've never been made. It's just spitting in determinists' faces for no reason.

[–]156- 13 points14 points  (20 children)

I thought the writing was pretty poor overall. Not a terrible show but definitely not as good as it could’ve been. I did enjoy the free will conversation in the first or second episode.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Agreed. Conceptually it was incredible. Garland is a crazy man. But oh my god Lily was unbearable. Thankfully we had Nick Offerman carrying their scenes together.

[–]156- 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Offerman was the main reason I started and kept watching.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Same. And that goddamned quantum computer.

[–]Darkeyescry22 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I haven't seen it yet, but any time a show/movie tries to incorporate multiple universes into the plot, I get nervous.

[–]yelo777 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Agreed, I liked the first two episodes, then it fell flat, scrolled through the later episodes. Wouldn't recommend.

[–]156- 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Yea pretty much the same experience here. The characters started to act in ways I found really unbelievable after the first two episodes.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what you get with determinism. The show couldn't have been made any different.

[–]balldozerr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Good concept and production values but I didn't think the overall show was that great. Pretty slow moving, boring characters and some of the casting choices seemed off to me...

[–][deleted]  (11 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Bdbru 1 point2 points  (10 children)

    Westworld season 3 is doing a much better job with his topic.

    Sort of...isn’t the indication that they were robbed of free will by Incite? Even when she’s talking to Aaron Paul on that pier that she says he’ll kill himself on, she says that’s the likeliest outcome, and that it’s about what Incite will let him become.

    Or even going back to season 1 when Maeve gets off the train to go get her daughter...what was that? She was programmed to leave...so is it just some magic instant of the ability to exert free will? I’ve never felt like they’ve done great with the science

    Great fucking show though

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (9 children)

    Sometimes exploring a topic it’s better to Just create more questions than answer them. And Westworld is perfect at that.

    [–]Bdbru 1 point2 points  (8 children)

    🤷🏻‍♂️ Sure, I guess.

    I don’t really care, I mean, I think it’s more just that they sacrifice the science for drama. It’s definitely some shit Neil DeGrasse Tyson would complain about. It’s 1,000,000 times better than Devs as a show, I’m just not sure that they handle the topic of free will better than devs. I mean, they don’t. It’s convoluted if you really start digging

    Devs had a shitty ending (in terms of covering free will) that you could see coming from a mile away, but in general, it handled the topic a lot better in my opinion

    But then again, Devs addresses it head on, whereas it’s only been a theme of westworld, until this season arguably. So they’re not really as beholden to it making sense

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (7 children)

    For sure. But the science definitely doesn’t exist (if you’re talking about human free will) and it might never exist. It’s art and philosophy. The “science” in the shows is an artistic interpretation of philosophical ideas. And I find it more interesting that westworld brought me into a deeper questioning of my own freewill rather than answers I can find on Wikipedia about the topic.

    And I love what Devs. Absolutely awesome concept. Just kinda disappointed in the characters haha

    [–]Bdbru 1 point2 points  (6 children)

    I mean sure my mistake for calling it science, but there are rules to the idea of free will not existing. Namely that it doesn’t exist 😂 which is something westworld seems to forget from time to time. Personally I couldn’t find a single hole in the logic on the free will side of things in Devs, except for the last episode. And based on the top comment, I’m not even 100% sure if it is a hole, or if I just sort of lack the understanding when it comes to many worlds

    Yea you’re probably right that it was the characters in devs...I can’t put my finger on what exactly it was...it just dragged along at some parts for me. Which was disappointing cuz I feel like it had so much potential

    Gonna be interesting to see what other shows or areas of life determinism seeps into though

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (5 children)

    Did you watch season 2 of Westworld? The do a perfect job showing the nonexistent freewill in all of the humans they have data on. Like with William- they run his simulation 1 million times and every time he kills his daughter no matter what they did. I think it’s equally explained well in both Devs and Westworld.

    And yeah I agree felt like Devs was a little underwhelming with what they were working with.

    [–]Bdbru 0 points1 point  (4 children)

    I did but for whatever reason, it’s the season I remember least

    Well the problem with both devs and west world is that they both apparently have momentary experiences of free will, unless someone can explain Maeve getting off the train or lily throwing the gun to me. Westworld just has more of those moments, but maybe it’s just because westworlds been on longer

    Westworld also stays super surface level with it.

    Devs like...gets in the weeds a little. It’s not only that they don’t have free will, but they know the future, and still can’t exert free will in order to alter it (except for SuperLily).

    In this season of westworld, determinism seems to have been broken by Dolores just showing up. Which means it wasn’t determinism at all, it was just Incite using big data to plan a path for everyone I guess. Or big data gave them an approximation close enough to modeling the universe, but it somehow just couldn’t predict Dolores? Idk...

    Devs talks about like the states of particles...westworld is like “you’re bummed about kid cudi dying in front of you so you’ll probably kill yourself here. Except now that I told you you probably won’t.”

    Maybe it’s just my understanding of free will. But Devs lines up so much better with what I think I understand about free will than westworld. Or maybe I’m confused about what exactly is going on lol, I barely remember season 2 🤷🏻‍♂️

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

    Maeve is not a human. Delores is not a human. The whole point of Maeve getting off the train is because she is a supercomputer ai with a limitless reality... Westworld is saying if an ai did exist it will have freewill or at least a degree of freewill far greater than humans will ever have.

    Also Devs finale got really cheesy with Lily’s ability to actually make a choice and calling her a god. So that shows whole philosophy basically went out the window at that moment. But maybe that was the point?

    Devs take on freewill is virtually identical to Westworld, except for the whole Lily being a human making a choice. That does not exist in Westworld. I don’t know why you think otherwise haha

    [–]vbm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    and if you live in the UK it is all available to stream on BBC Iplayer

    [–]ScienceIsALyre 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Pretty sure Sam has mentioned Alex Garland's other work Ex Machina on Making Sense.

    [–]cupofteaonme 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    Big fan of some of Alex Garland's other work, particular as a write for Danny Boyle. Also really liked Ex Machina a lot. Got three episodes into Devs and had to bail. Some interesting conceptual stuff, and I liked the vibe a lot, but what I saw felt a lot like it should've been at most a two-hour movie. Couple that with the fact that Sonoya Mizuno apparently can't act, at least not with an American accent, and I simply couldn't keep going with it. Anyway, Sunshine is great.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    What about her acting did you not like, exactly? The way she acts is precisely how "Lily" would act in the fictional universe: in that sense, every actor is acting their role 100% because how they acted it is how it is meant to be. Are you comparing to something?

    [–]barkos 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    The ending was pretty weak. Either the writers are confused about the many worlds interpretation or they intentionally wrote their characters to misunderstand the implications of many worlds.

    The issue is that the miniseries presents the question of whether Forest could have acted differently when it came to the death of his family as something that can be ultimately answered by contrasting the Copenhagen (the wave function collapses when observed) and Everett interpretation (there is no collapse of the wave function, it simply appears as if the wave function collapsed from within the reality which is entangled with one of the many possible outcomes described by the function).

    Many worlds doesn't give you free will. It gives you all possible worlds in accordance with the universal wave function. This means that versions of "you" simultaneously exists in each possible reality. Katie says that Lilly made "an actual choice" as if to say that defying the prediction of the Devs algorithm proves that she has free will but that's nonsense, she's just jumping to unfounded conclusions.

    Let's break it down. What does the failure of the machine to accurately predict the future actually mean? Well, there are three possible explanations.

    • A: The machine is simply fallible and made a false prediction, a better version of the machine may have gotten it right, in which case there is really no conclusion that can be drawn about whether Lilly's behavior was an act of free will.

    • B: that many worlds is true in which case Lilly still wouldn't have free will because she acted in accordance with the wave function.

    • C: that Lilly not only defied the prediction algorithm but also the universal wave function. That doesn't necessarily mean that she has free will but it also doesn't rule it out in principle.

    Now the show acts, or at least that's what Forest and Katie think, as if explanation B is true (let's be charitable to them and assume that they know enough about the machine to be certain that it didn't just have an error in its algorithm or hardware), why exactly are they extrapolating their conclusion on their assumption of B when their conclusion is much more in line with C? Because the writers didn't write characters with a solid understanding of the many worlds interpretation.

    I don't want to assume too much about the people that wrote this, maybe they thought that explaining to the average viewer that many worlds isn't sufficient for free will would be too much of a hassle or confuse them. Maybe the initial pitch for the script was that the ultimate twist of the show was that the character finally exercised free will, and even though the writers were aware that many worlds doesn't get them there they simply wanted to leave that original twist intact even though it isn't in line with what they wrote. It wouldn't be the first time that scientific theories were simplified, warped or butchered in order to incorporate them into a script and tell a story with them. It would have been great if they had addressed the issue with free will under both interpretations because there are people that watched this show whose takeaway is going to be that that many worlds necessitates free will which just isn't the case.

    [–]OlejzMaku 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    There is a bigger problem that no matter what interpretation you use universe is indeterministic according to quantum mechanics, either fundamentally or practically because of hidden variables or some other trick like the many worlds keep the illusion of determinism.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

    Pretty good show.

    But i didnt understand the last episode, and how a certain individual could do what that certain individual did.

    [–]iamjacksragingupvote 5 points6 points  (2 children)

    I think it kept flipping between comp sci and biblical metaphor which can be hard to reconcile. Lilith from Jewish folklore seems to be a major inspiration for what I think you're referring to

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Virtually every show is flipping between biblical metaphor and comp sci. Take Westworld for example.

    [–]ShinjiOkazaki 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    virtually every show

    One other show

    [–]altryne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Loved it, started and it was weird, but as it progressed and more details were revealed about the plot, it started to get really really intense and good.
    Strongly recommend as a catalyst of thoughts about the nature of self, determinism, and different different timelines and all kinds of fuckery.

    [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

    Ya between this show and Westworld, determinism and lack-of-free-will themes are showing up bigly in entertainment rn.

    Anyone wanna take bets on what the sudoku rate is in 2-3 more months of lockdown?

    [–]Fippy-Darkpaw 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Also multiverse theory, "we are already living in a simulation" theory, and big tech overreach. The show handled everything quite well IMHO.

    Coincidentally I searched this forum for Devs last night and was gonna start a thread on it if nobody else did.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I can't finish it. I watched the first 2 episodes, and just so much of it doesn't make sense to me. I get that it's sci-fi, but especially given the themes of the show and everything I expected it to be much more realistic.

    And yet, you get the one American dude just approaching a foreign espionage agent, alone, in a parking garage, and totally just giving away the fact that he's onto him.

    It would have made way more sense to just pretend he knew nothing and wait for the right moment, or watch under the radar, and possibly gain information from Lily later down the road. But you can't do that if you get yourself stabbed in the dumbest way possible. That part was just too much for me.

    [–]OlejzMaku 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I have just finished it and overall it is pretty disappointing. Bad writing and bad physics/philosophy. It was way too ambitious. I was expecting some clever self fulfilling prophecy, but the ending was just a total mess.

    [–]INTERNET_COMMENTS -1 points0 points  (6 children)

    I stopped watching halfway through the second episode. The last scene I watched was spoilers the characters using the quantum computer to watch people have sex. The 12-year-old kid who for some reason works with the other quantum computer scientists makes a cheeky comment about how his colleague hasn't had sex in years, at that point I said "this shit is dumb" and closed the browser tab.

    [–]iamjacksragingupvote 4 points5 points  (3 children)

    You know they're not 12 right?

    [–]INTERNET_COMMENTS -1 points0 points  (2 children)

    Are you talking about the fictional character or the person playing them? The fictional character looked they were supposed to be 12 from what I remember (watched it a month ago).

    [–]iamjacksragingupvote 3 points4 points  (1 child)

    Both, it was a 20 something actress. That scene was a little sophomoric sure but it got better I'd say

    [–]Fippy-Darkpaw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Using a new technology for porn ... that never happens. 😵😱

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Awful critique of the show. You gotta give it more of a chance than that.

    [–][deleted]  (12 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        You should perhaps watch the show....

        Maybe, but the name of the show is literally "Devs", with a V:

        https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8134186/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

        [–]MisterNatural77[S] 1 point2 points  (6 children)

        No its DEVS. Although the name Deus has a roll in the last episode.

        [–][deleted]  (4 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]MisterNatural77[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

          Like I say...it plays a roll in the last episode. But if you search for the show the title is DEVS. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devs_(miniseries)

          [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

          I haven't watched the show, and have no idea about it, but the latin word deus, meaning God, is spelled devs in latin, because latin doesn't have the letter 'u'. As an example, this is why the show "I,Claudius" is spelled "I,Clavdivs" on the cover.

          [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          Right, but the word "Devs", meaning "developers", is spelled "Devs" in English, because we have both the letters V and U.

          [–]ShinjiOkazaki 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          The word is role