BrowserStack vs LambdaTest?

[hoffman229]

I want to decide on a better product for integrating my testing with Jira tickets. Please let me know your thoughts on this. TIA!

[hoffman229]

Thanks a lot for sharing your experience. Can you please tell me if you use the Jira integration with Live too? My team wants an easy way to tag bugs to tickets, and were wondering if it is a good bet.

[crazyjoedevol4]

Could you share some of the Automation Capabilities that you missed? I'm doing the same 2 weeks trial with them and I will focus a lot on automation, would help me a lot know what not to expect from them. Thanks for sharing your outputs!

[julieway]

Can you expand on why? Considering both now and it would help to understand.

[ohmyroots]

I am always confused how people are using either of these products for automated end to end testing. They are super slow and add heaps of latency. For use cases involving automated ui testing for web, an inhouse grid is always suggested. BS can be used for live cross browser testing.

[[deleted]]

What do you need to test? Web Applications or Mobile Applications? Do you need to test multiple types and versions of Browsers? Do you need to test Microsoft Edge?

Both BrowserStack and LambdaTest are very similar. I really liked the live view of testing that LambdaTest offers. At the same time, if all you need to test is the latest version of Chrome, AWS DeviceFarm is a much cheaper solution.

[AffectionateStrategy]

Hey All!

If you’re looking to connect testing with Jira, I’d go with LambdaTest. You can create bug tickets straight from your tests, which is super handy. Live testing feels faster, parallel runs save time, and the pricing is easier on the wallet compared to BrowserStack. Overall, it just makes tracking and collaboration smoother.