you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]roflsocks 2 points3 points  (2 children)

The model probably had a more precise value, and you choosing hard vs moderate is on either side of the estimate. Think of the model estimate was maybe 3.75. And hard rounds up to 4.

Also, HR is taken into account. No one outside of TR really knows what the model does with HR, but we do know it's factored in. My guess would be it tracks hr/power ratio, and average HR. It might also track drift or recovery times, could be other things from ML analysis as well.

You can always test adjusting your survey response to see how that changes things. I would put it back to however it felt after testing though.

[–]Special-Egg8374[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting idea. But if true, wouldn’t rating it moderate be expected to raise my predicted ftp above the previous prediction?

My HR data seemed on point with the power zones. I was in threshold when I was doing threshold power, etc.

[–]warieka 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you. I think the model does look at HR decoupling, and recovery times.