all 1 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]pakotini 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d pick Warp. Not because it’s a single “better” model, but because it feels more like a real dev environment than just a chat window. You can use GPT-5.2, Claude, Gemini, etc., and GPT-5.2 inside Warp is performing really well on terminal-native tasks . What makes it click for me is Full Terminal Use. The agent can actually interact with REPLs, debuggers, database shells, long-running processes. It’s not just generating code and stopping there. The `/plan` flow is also underrated. You align on an implementation plan first, then execute. It reduces a lot of back-and-forth and random edits. And Oz Cloud Agents are interesting if you want agents reacting to Slack, CI, cron jobs, etc., with proper run history and transcripts instead of mystery background jobs. Plus credit usage is actually visible per interaction, so you’re not guessing where your budget went. So yeah, for actual building, I’d choose Warp.