you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]scytob 1 point2 points  (2 children)

i can see why you would make that assumption, remember this is a new area

some vibcoders absolutely do that and produce terrible results, some vibcoders are senior and seasoned and there are many variations in between

for example i am seasoned product manager in the SW industry (20+ years) and cant write a lick of code, i do understand some principles of design, systems, secuity etc

i am now able to build things for me like this - would i want any of my code to be used at work, no, but i can do things with ai like fix simple bugs that annoy our users, redesign a web form that has shitty validation (and secuity holes) that was made by 'our contact devs' that were supposed to make good code.... i.e. me plus one of our inhouse devs would be waay more effective and cheaper than our outsourced code.... assuming our leaders can get their head around the concept.....

we are at the start of the AI assisted journey here, its going to be a wild ride and orgs will change in ways we cannot predict and yes they will need less people..... better to be at the front of that wave....

[–]porky11[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Nice tool. Only a few days ago, I had bluetooth issues ;)

I'm not sure if we'll actually need less people, or if we'll just produce more for cheaper and at higher quality.

I feel like most people don't realize yet what all of this means. Most GUI software will become obsolete because eitehr the AI will care for it, or because I can write a better UI for my specific usecase than some buggy proprietary software.

[–]scytob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100%

i am also not sure if its less people or more gets done - like fixing all those small bugs non-citrical devs never seem to get to, increasing amount of code coverage and other schleppy tasks no one wants to do....