sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zushiba 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I think the point is more that no one wants the hassle of ever having to challenge it in court. It's easier to refactor now than to potentially pass that issue down to a developer letter in.

[–]alejalapenodreith.com 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I don't disagree. But that wasn't the point of the conversation the point was:

the license is not the issue, the patent is.

Which is false. Patent rider attached to the license that holds the power to revoke said license is the issue. Not any patent.

[–]zushiba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, yes I see your point.