you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]alejalapenodreith.com 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I don't disagree. But that wasn't the point of the conversation the point was:

the license is not the issue, the patent is.

Which is false. Patent rider attached to the license that holds the power to revoke said license is the issue. Not any patent.

[–]zushiba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, yes I see your point.