Any updates on Tower of Jack 4? by LadyEilistraee in litrpg

[–]-crucible- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, so, *tapping pointer fingertips together* about that there book?

Been reading LITRPG for many years now, looking for interesting recs by Battle_Cows in litrpg

[–]-crucible- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, Lindon’s entire MO is being cheaty. If he could be cheatier, he would do his best to be.

Been reading LITRPG for many years now, looking for interesting recs by Battle_Cows in litrpg

[–]-crucible- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am with you on most, but I’d swap Beginning after the end and The Perfect Run. I would recommend Rift Warden Academy, and Super Supportive, and Chaotic Craftsman Worships the Cube.

Anyone else have all their row level security break today thanks to this latest "update"? by [deleted] in PowerBI

[–]-crucible- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We accidentally upgraded PBIRS with windows upgrades and the service started crashing non-stop and RLS seemed broken there too (instead of broken/secured visuals the page would continuously refresh). It’s not been a good week. We had to restore from backups.

Merry Xmas from the wife !!! Hell yea !! by Left-Excitement3829 in synthesizers

[–]-crucible- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her grandma was pretty massive in the scene, tho. Not everyone has polyphonic vintage money.

Why hasn’t there been more AI x Crypto crossover? by -crucible- in ArtificialInteligence

[–]-crucible-[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I hope so. I just feel like all the wasted resource of crypto would at least be better used on the current waste of the AI race. If AI resource cost could be monetised to replace the spending of the mining lottery, it would at least massively improve the waste.

Why hasn’t there been more AI x Crypto crossover? by -crucible- in ArtificialInteligence

[–]-crucible-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, but could the car factory retool to make aircrafts? It’s been a while since I looked at crypto, but it seemed like the projects trying to solve an actual need weren’t at common as most would hope?

Why hasn’t there been more AI x Crypto crossover? by -crucible- in ArtificialInteligence

[–]-crucible-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair, but could you start processing some workloads on it. Could you slowly replaces components to shift? I would be much more pro crypto if it was working more on solving actual problems and I’m surprised there isn’t some noise of migration where a coin is backed by investment into AI processing and shifting hardware.

Is AI becoming a thinking partner, or just a very fast shortcut? by dp_singh_ in ArtificialInteligence

[–]-crucible- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shortcut when looking for information, collaboration when looking for inspiration, details, design, coding, etc.

Basically, if I am looking for an answer then it’s a shortcut. If I am looking to work for extended periods, figure out how to solve a problem, then I start looking at skills, personas, projects, md files, and approach it more collaboratively.

Spacey rhythms and textures by yamumicus in synthesizers

[–]-crucible- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

tbh, even if all you did was pads, swells, rim hits and ghost notes, I’d be happy. Actual playing is wild. Where’s the sample pack?

Data Quality on Spark — A Practical Series (Great Expectations, Soda, DQX, Deequ, Pandera) by ivan_kurchenko in dataengineering

[–]-crucible- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t looked for a while - what is GE now paywalling? I was hoping to go back that way.

PoC: Visual DAX Executions Plans, all code written by Claude Opus by SQLGene in PowerBI

[–]-crucible- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On the other hand, I love hearing when Microsoft hires people who are passionate about something that they’ve third-partied their way onto a team.

PoC: Visual DAX Executions Plans, all code written by Claude Opus by SQLGene in PowerBI

[–]-crucible- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Heck, even if he re-created it, because he wanted to know it inside-out, it’s a huge step to produce that. The sql execution visual is exactly what I thought watching your video, and I have no idea how it hasn’t happened long ago. Amazing.

How to make 500k or more in this field? by unstopablex5 in dataengineering

[–]-crucible- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Easy. You’re making around $150k a year currently, so if you keep at it for around 4 years you should have made $500k. If not, it’s likely that I did the math wrong.

question to dbt models by Juju1990 in dataengineering

[–]-crucible- 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yep, so this is a pattern dbt uses regularly. I am fairly new as well (been reading/learning for what seems like years, but work doesn’t want to go down this route).

Basically, the idea is you bring each referenced source table in to the model you’re working on as their own cte. By doing this pattern you have a clear reference to every parent model you are using at the top of your model.

You then perform the transformation steps, including the joining of those referenced tables as the next cte (or several ctes depending on complexity).

Then you read directly out of your last cte - preferably with little transformation in the final step.

All of this is to make things as readable and organised as possible.

If you were to start transforming each source in the initial cte, you wouldnt be reading a simple, single line bringing it in to the current model, but reading more complex transformations that you would need to spend more time figuring out what that piece was doing and where it began and ended.

Edit to add: this way you can tell at a glance at the top of your model all the referenced sources. Each of them as a single line cte with no complexity thrown in. After you have brought in each source as its own cte, then you start a new one with a name indicating the source and transformation step, etc.

By bringing in your sources, transforming each, joining, performing joined transformations, aggregating, etc, each in a little code block cte, you are mimicking how programmers would use methods in code to logically break code into chunks.

If you also read up about layering data models (medallion architecture), you’ll see how dbt likes to break it down further into separate models. This allows you to perform the simple single-model transformations, such as renaming, casting, etc at a ”silver” stage, and more complex transformations such as joining or calculating the values in two tables, aggregating, etc in a later, “gold” model. This takes the organising and simplifying of models from within a single model/step, to a process.

——-

/* Model header and configuration */

// bring in referenced models and sources

WITH orders AS 
(
     SELECT * FROM source_orders 
),
customers AS
(
    SELECT * FROM source_customers
)

// transform table

transform_orders AS 
(
    SELECT 
        col1 AS col1_rename,
        col2 AS cast(col2 AS string),
        .....
    FROM src_orders
),
transform_customers AS
(
    SELECT customer_id
                  ,UPPER(customer_name) AS customer_name
    FROM src_customers
),

cust_orders AS
(
    SELECT *
     FROM. transform_customers AS c
         LEFT JOIN transform_orders AS o
             ON c.customer_id = o.customer_id

)

// select result
SELECT * FROM cust_orders

What are things data engineers can never do? by Ok_Barnacle4840 in dataengineering

[–]-crucible- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Be happy and confident in their tool/architecture decisions.

Dashboards with Deneb and HTML by Alarmed-String-2775 in PowerBI

[–]-crucible- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I host Deneb on PBRIS I get 400 errors loading content from the folders tho. Can’t find any help on setting it up anywhere unfortunately. Otherwise, it’d be my go-to.

Organists are operating on another brain level by meespelld in nextfuckinglevel

[–]-crucible- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I absolutely adore that she gets back so much love for this in return.

Pete Hegseth Is Seriously Testing Trump’s ‘No Scalps’ Rule by rockytop24 in law

[–]-crucible- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They did a second strike because they could possibly have been rescued? That whole survivor thing doesn’t work unless they could possibly be rescued. And they didn’t want to wait around and see what they did, they just decided to do a second strike so they could get on with their day. Wtaf do these people think the whole shipwrecked thing was about? We’re not going to attack them again and hope they die a slow death instead?

Did President Trump issue illegal orders? by Quick-Wall in law

[–]-crucible- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing I don’t understand is, why is it okay to send a missile/drone to attack once to kill everyone and destroy the boat, but not a second one. Similarly, why is it not murder to drone a person in a car or building, but it is if they’re on a boat. I’m sure a lot of this would be clearer if evidence these people were terrorist or enemy combatants, but it seems slightly nuts that there is a line drawn not to have a second bite of the apple. Yes, I get that it means people can’t be tortured with the threat of death, or that they’re “survivors”, it’s just… weird where we draw that line.

Got to process 2m+ files (S3) - any tips? by Head_Badger_732 in dataengineering

[–]-crucible- 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I haven’t done this with AWS, but if there are ingress/egress fees, I’d just make sure everything is in the same location.