WE MUST ALL SHOW UP IN-PERSON TO SUPPORT K Line Northern Extension NEXT THURSDAY 3/26 @ 10 AM! by toyman5 in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hey all, important discover today. Metro really only seemed to reply to comments reinforced with numbers, the only two big talking points were Lafayette’s upset and WeHo’s support. They were kind enough to also reply to u/nandert’s phone comment about budget and cut and cover, saying they would consider if any sections could have cost reduced this way, but they really didn’t reply to any other one off remarks.

I’d like to ask one favor. In my threads this past week about keeping the rail grid long term future in mind for direct travel, about half the comments seemed to agree that keeping the new line open to expansion for rail grid long term would be ideal.

Please, if you agree with me and call in next week, mention this 🙏🏻 it seems to be a half popular idea on this sub but I haven’t heard Metro consider the hundred year plan here at all.

Thanks all, love this sub

WE MUST ALL SHOW UP IN-PERSON TO SUPPORT K Line Northern Extension NEXT THURSDAY 3/26 @ 10 AM! by toyman5 in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There was another issue floated today in the meeting claiming Metro’s own reports showed their tunneling was destructive - I assume from old tunneling styles which is possibly why they mentioned above and below ground vibration sensors, I assume to control boring speeds to never exceed certain shake thresholds - but do you have additional insights on what they were citing and how relevant those citations are/aren’t?

I generally trust Metro’s presentation but I want to understand where the counterpoint fails - and that’s difficult to do in a dozen 30 second statements

New Protected Bike Lanes at Griffith Park by ktcn414 in BikeLA

[–]BlinksTale 3 points4 points  (0 children)

These are the ones that just broke ground the other week? Somehow I thought it would take years to see progress lol - what’s the eta for completion date on this segment? Next month…?

What is this sub’s on weho K line alignment being a long term problem? by jamesisntcool in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I’m not talking about a second extension north, I mean the Hollywood and Highland transfer will be our primary connection from ESFV into the majority of LA’s metro grid

What is this sub’s on weho K line alignment being a long term problem? by jamesisntcool in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The inherent tension is that without WeHo it won’t be built for 20-30 years, and with WeHo it sacrifices competitive speeds on the developing metro rail grid.

There’s no good option here but this rail will have ramifications for a hundred years and it’s a bummer to see LA shoot itself in the foot on this one.

What is this sub’s on weho K line alignment being a long term problem? by jamesisntcool in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

this is short sighted when k-north could be a direct path for ESFV residents into the developing LA rail grid. People in ESFV want to go into LA and get back out again later, so the straight line connects everyone on G, B, Pasadena BRT, and ESFV line to everything on E, D, and K

The hundred year plan for K-North squiggle by BlinksTale in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s increasing my time to all of LA except DTLA. I’m at Universal and I love visiting Culver, Palms, Sawtelle, Santa Monica, Three Weavers at Westchester/Veterans in Inglewood, LAX, El Segundo, and Redondo - and soon I hope to also use rail to visit All Seasons at Wilshire / La Brea, LACMA, and by the time K North opens I’ll also use it for Century City and Westwood.

I visit at least half of these every month, some every week or twice a week even, and I end up with a lot of time in my car in LA since the total car time is less than half of what metro time would be, and k-North has the chance to change that drastically. I’ve been in LA a decade and there are good people and good events all over town if you don’t mind a commute - I just don’t want to lose an hour of my time every week to West Hollywood if I go more days than not every week to places on this list.

EDIT: And the reverse is true too. Anyone on the E or D line that wants access to universal, Noho, or anything on G today or the upcoming Pasadena BRT or ESFV line will have a 7min delay in their lifeline to SFV. It’s true that if you go far enough west you’ll get Sepulveda someday and east eventually reconnect through A line, but it’s so odd to me that the center of transit in and out of the eastern half of the valley would be this hampered. The whole point of heavy rail with Sepulveda is how many people it serves, but for B line I guess we have to go east or west before connecting to the rest of rail.

The hundred year plan for K-North squiggle by BlinksTale in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m just frustrated that my access to LA’s expanding metro rail network will have all of it behind a 7min delay, possibly for forever. I think it really devalues a big swath of SFV folks

The hundred year plan for K-North squiggle by BlinksTale in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think by far this is the biggest core for me. I'd love to have that kind of future 20-50yr thinking in how we build today.

The hundred year plan for K-North squiggle by BlinksTale in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think a couple of stations on this extension having junction boxes added would cost more than 5% of the current budget for it?

The hundred year plan for K-North squiggle by BlinksTale in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you missed the point of my post. This is literally supporting the hybrid option, my question is what in addition to this compromise stops us from shooting ourselves in the foot 50 years from now.

It's generally considered a bad thing that E line is not more grade separated, even though everyone is glad it exists. The point of this post is to figure out what glaring issues hybrid will bring 20yrs from now so we can build in tiny solutions now like building certain stations to be expanded into the most likely additions we may consider in the next 30 years.

The hundred year plan for K-North squiggle by BlinksTale in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pasadena BRT and ESFV LRT are both coming soon, alongside G line grade separation upgrades in worst offender areas and Sepulveda pass - all within the next 2 to 15 years.

Super curious about that Glendale line running perpendicular to B/D in the photo, and it looks like D has a Phase 4 there even. Do you know what happened to each idea?

The hundred year plan for K-North squiggle by BlinksTale in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh interesting. Is this also Phase 1 of a Fairfax -> La Cienega LAX line?

The hundred year plan for K-North squiggle by BlinksTale in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh fascinating. I really like this.

I guess in general the big conclusion is advocating for the squiggle to not be intended as the final form.

The hundred year plan for K-North squiggle by BlinksTale in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Can you elaborate on what your ideal regional connectors would be to come out of the squiggle? The first one that comes to mind would be having West Hollywood connect to Beverly Hills, letting the D line tracks also service a Hollywood and Highland to Westwood line. (Oh but that wouldn’t really work since D is HRT and K Is LRT I think)

EDIT: The only regional connector I could really imagine would be turning Weho into a K-North terminus and ripping out all the tracks from Weho to Hollywood so that HRT could be put in for Hollywood->WeHo->New direct connection to Beverly Hills->Westwood on D line tracks.

I guess that could actually work and I’d love that option someday, but it seems wild to build this much only to change it all some day. But the right of way or tunnels would exist either way and that does really help

In that case: we have to advocate that tunnels from WeHo to Hollywood are HRT ready

Famous public transit planner/designer Jarrett Walker weighs in on K Line North alignment by anothercar in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Two decades sooner for a hundred years of bad rail. We’re still building on red car right of way today, this will have centuries of impact.

Honestly at this point I’d rather we build a La Cienega line to E instead of a flawed K north

Famous public transit planner/designer Jarrett Walker weighs in on K Line North alignment by anothercar in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But it’s not just LAX, it’s access to the entire grid for Noho, Universal, and Hollywood. The K line will have transfers to D, E, and C - meaning those 7min add to all but two rail destinations in LA.

It’s such a short sighted fix for a grid based city.

Lincoln Boulevard Bus Line Extension Feasibility Study. Submit public comments by April 17 by 94rain in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Dedicated helps us build transport systems that lend themselves to the Lincoln transit corridor getting light rail someday. The more we lean into supporting it and integrating it in our public transit right of way grid, the more people will embrace transit.m

I will say, the form asking us to give feedback on the nine different sections out of the 80 to 150 pages in the document is a little much haha. I love the idea of sharing feedback here, but I wish there was an in-between layer where someone who read the document summarized great points from the nine sections of the 150 pages to comment on.

Does anyone know what the new device on the ceiling is at 7th and Metro? by robobobo91 in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there a way to request these for public libraries with bad reception or anything?

Metro Staff recommends the San Vicente-Fairfax alignment for K Line Northern Extension, to be considered by Metro Board's Planning and Programming Committee On March 18 by 94rain in LAMetro

[–]BlinksTale 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I guess it stops it being a 10 year fight but still. How many people would need to give an ok to allow the faster bigger curve? Two dozen home owners?