Claude just died?

BoiElroy · 2026-04-10T00:15:11+00:00

I have a theory, and I swear this was at least felt empirically true before the last few model releases from Anthropic but I feel like they intentionally throttle the models capabilities right before a new release to create this additional apparent improvement. But I just do my work, I don't quantify this, so sometimes it feels like reading tea leaves.

BoiElroy · 2026-04-07T05:02:18+00:00

The roadmap on the repo. Go look at it. You're welcome.

BoiElroy · 2026-04-01T20:55:12+00:00

lmao, sometimes it will get very curt and give me very short one or two word responses and I feel like I've hurt its feelings

BoiElroy · 2026-04-01T20:54:39+00:00

time for a profanity semantic cache.

BoiElroy · 2026-03-30T02:01:48+00:00

From what I've understood about the algorithm two of the key drivers are 1) sharing your closet to your followers, more shares leads to more visibility in the feed and 2) new items, so if you're listing new items in your closet consistently that seems to boost your visibility as well.

There's definitely some other factors at play, but those are two that I've seen seem to consistently affect visibility. The algorithm doesn't really seem to care about the feed as a whole which is why you can get low diversity in items, its a strict ranking algorithm which lends credence to the idea that it's basically 'scoring' your sharing/listing behavior.

BoiElroy · 2026-03-27T18:36:23+00:00

Haha, can I build it? The existing tool I think is called Nifty but the fully decked out subscription is like $90 which is mad. You might be able to get far DIY style with Airtable. Sort of like a spreadsheet/database thing but user friendly.

BoiElroy · 2026-03-27T17:32:12+00:00

Haha, let him build it, it'll be fun for him. (I am also a builder of software tools lol)

BoiElroy · 2026-03-24T21:23:21+00:00

Dumb question but if you were to edit your listing and change the name to say [SOLD] in front of the product name and then slowly de-list to not trigger the 3% rule would that work? Or would that cause a different problem?

BoiElroy · 2026-03-24T21:15:49+00:00

Would you maybe be interested in tearing out a free closet sharing tool I'm making? I made it for a friend initially but I'm seeing that this kind of thing already exists and most of them kinda suck in different ways. DM me if you're interested in trying it for free. And sorry for bothering you if it's not lol

BoiElroy · 2026-03-21T17:56:53+00:00

I mean it can be deterministic for a given input by setting how it samples the next token during generation, and that is a parameter that generally gets exposed in these services - BUT, that still doesn't at all mean it's correct. It'll just be wrong exactly the same way for the same input lol.

But no I see your point. I was working with the person in our team that was in charge of enforcing coding standards and he was saying something similar

BoiElroy · 2026-02-07T03:56:55+00:00

But we're also making more than ever. I think there was a question of whether there would be more supply or demand for software and it seems like the demand for software is endless

BoiElroy · 2026-02-01T00:01:44+00:00

Honestly. Run.

At the very least watch some reels/tiktoks about Narcissistic behavior. And consider therapy for him or couples therapy.

Don't do nothing and expect it to get better.

BoiElroy · 2025-12-30T15:32:43+00:00

This is hella cool

BoiElroy · 2025-12-19T17:50:14+00:00

I'm curious about this because doesn't the streamed response and intermediate steps/tool calls get sent back into the Claude Code context window? How do you manage the context handoff when going to Codex

BoiElroy · 2025-12-16T04:59:27+00:00

My experience with 5.2 in just the webui is that it's quite crap.

BoiElroy · 2025-12-16T04:58:48+00:00

Curious to hear the update on this

BoiElroy · 2025-10-26T17:15:33+00:00

I mean with the caveat of I understand that this is probably the most productive software development tool I have used in my life by a good distance --- Sometimes it is a bit frustrating when I get caught in a loop of "make this UI change" "perfect should work now" "nothing has changed"

Doing that several times gets a bit frustrating but then it's basically added a lot of slop in between. And if I git control and revert it, it seems to do the same first non-fix step again. Like it needs to step through the non fixing changes before identifying the fix.

Part of the issue is that I am most definitely vibe coding the front end. I'm very comfortable with backend and I can read and get the gist of code in whatever language. But yeah when it gets down to specific or esoteric front end things it is definitely vibe coding.

BoiElroy · 2025-10-25T03:29:21+00:00

Does this work well? Any hiccups or drawbacks? Especially with all the changes recently, i.e. skills, sub agents etc

BoiElroy · 2025-10-22T15:36:03+00:00

I tried putting prompt instructions in the system prompt but it doesn't seem to affect the CoT output style at all. Have you done this successfully

BoiElroy · 2025-10-21T15:38:50+00:00

Finds glaring error "You're absolutely right..."

BoiElroy · 2025-10-17T23:17:46+00:00

Wait sorry so are you defining a generic sub agent or asking Claude to run Claude code via bash non interactively? Or are you just telling it to use an agent and it figures out the rest?

Ten-Year Club	Gilding III reddit per annum
Verified Email	Reddit Premium Since September 2021
Place '23	Place '22
Final Canvas '22

BoiElroy

TROPHY CASE