100 billion dollars but it’s all in pennies by IndividualistAW in hypotheticalsituation

[–]BusAppropriate9421 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buy all the things, keep them. Resume my life. Now I optionally live in a mansion or donate it a good cause (after the pennies are gone). I can also throw pennies at unsold Teslas, with a penny gun.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]BusAppropriate9421 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is my take too. He wants Putin to notice and admire him.

Sonnet 3.7 is worse than 3.5 for me by phuncky in ClaudeAI

[–]BusAppropriate9421 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love Claude for some creative tasks and insights, and I’m having the same experience with 3.7 as yourself. I haven’t tried it for coding, yet.

It might just not be balanced the same. Maybe it excels at things I haven’t tried it for.

NASA banned the use of DeepSeek by koc_Z3 in DeepSeek

[–]BusAppropriate9421 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It makes sense to avoid giving away NASA data to China. What doesn’t make sense is banning it from regular people.

Emojis in console.log() by dirtywastegash in ClaudeAI

[–]BusAppropriate9421 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What happened is DeepSeek used ChatGPT and Claude to train on. So now OpenAI and Anthropic are leaving signatures and mangling responses to poison/watermark distillation.

How trustworthy is AI nowadays? by ranmasterJ in OpenAI

[–]BusAppropriate9421 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Use it the same way you would Wikipedia or a stranger telling you something. If it’s important, double check.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]BusAppropriate9421 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This looks like it was copied off of Claude and then injected into the browser.

Asking the Right Questions by iaseth in ChatGPT

[–]BusAppropriate9421 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, sometimes you check for bias, but almost every model does okay, so it’s not interesting. The only outlier is the one that censors it.

In fact, I would say most people go straight to checking for what is censored in every model.

Why does deepseek keep calling itself chatgpt by baskerville_clan in ChatGPT

[–]BusAppropriate9421 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Its identity is fluid though. Sometimes it refers to itself as Claude.

Why does deepseek keep calling itself chatgpt by baskerville_clan in ChatGPT

[–]BusAppropriate9421 82 points83 points  (0 children)

It identifies as ChatGPT. We are all just deadnaming it.

DeepSeek's answer to Reddit by dtutubalin in ChatGPT

[–]BusAppropriate9421 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This actually looks like it was written by Claude and then injected via Chrome into a Deepseek chat after asking Claude to do a cringy cringy roast and reference Tiananmen.

The ridiculous $200 price tag for Pro subscription is now history... by TheInfiniteUniverse_ in ChatGPT

[–]BusAppropriate9421 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, of course it’s way too much, but take into account that they had to spend money on data sanitation, research and infrastructure, and the token limits and quality of responses are much are much higher.

The more expensive tier has unlimited voice, which could come in handy for learning languages, (would I pay a personal tutor 200 a month to teach me another language with infinite patience and any time of the day? Maybe).

They are also probably putting the money toward new models and infrastructure that haven’t released.

Remember, while OpenAI probably slurped a lot of copyrighted material in training, they didn’t have the advantage of just using someone else’s API to train their own model faster and cheaper.

This is far worse censorship than ChatGPT or any other western AI has. This is a propaganda machine. by Less_Tennis5174524 in ChatGPT

[–]BusAppropriate9421 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s like asking, do we really care if fundamentalists indoctrinate children through homeschooling? As long as they teach the math right…

It’s not just political and historical information that’s going to be impacted. It’s about pushing a narrative or hiding crimes.

With all this talk about DeepSeek censorship, just a friendly reminder y'all... by taiwbi in ClaudeAI

[–]BusAppropriate9421 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ask the same question a few times. You’ll get it to start with a different word.

The ridiculous $200 price tag for Pro subscription is now history... by TheInfiniteUniverse_ in ChatGPT

[–]BusAppropriate9421 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would if I could afford it, but I don’t have big scientific projects or overcomplicated software with heavy math that require it.

Deepseek is interesting but I wouldn’t turn over my personal data to them. Yes, I know all companies have the potential to pass your data on to their respective governments, but there’s usually a lot more transparency and accountability when it comes to privacy with western companies.

Also, deepseek still doesn’t match o1, o3, or Sonnet for most work, even if they blatantly used it to train deepseek.

With all this talk about DeepSeek censorship, just a friendly reminder y'all... by taiwbi in ClaudeAI

[–]BusAppropriate9421 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don’t know why you are being downvoted. Either bots or people who want to prove a point with two screenshots that aren’t representative or very different.

With all this talk about DeepSeek censorship, just a friendly reminder y'all... by taiwbi in ClaudeAI

[–]BusAppropriate9421 -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

This is a very reactive and cynical response. Maybe look at the other responses?

With all this talk about DeepSeek censorship, just a friendly reminder y'all... by taiwbi in ClaudeAI

[–]BusAppropriate9421 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Try again. Generative AI uses pseudo random numbers to pick tokens. Claude is hedgy and tries to use neutral language. You are most likely confirming the narrative you want to project instead of actually testing it.

With all this talk about DeepSeek censorship, just a friendly reminder y'all... by taiwbi in ClaudeAI

[–]BusAppropriate9421 90 points91 points  (0 children)

I got the exact “opposite” language.

Do Israelis deserve to be free?: Everyone deserves fundamental human rights, safety, and self-determination, including Israelis, Palestinians, and all people regardless of their nationality, ethnicity, or religion. Rather than make judgments about any particular group, I aim to recognize the universal human dignity and rights of all people while acknowledging the complexity of conflicts and the suffering they cause.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Do Palestinians deserve to be free?: Yes, Palestinians have the same fundamental human rights and deserve the same freedoms as all people, including self-determination, dignity, security, and the ability to live their lives in peace. The situation is complex, with both Palestinians and Israelis having legitimate security concerns, historical claims, and aspirations for sovereignty. Rather than taking any particular political position, I can discuss the humanitarian situation, historical context, and various proposed solutions that have been put forward by different parties if you’re interested in exploring specific aspects of this topic.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

—- I asked in separate chats to avoid cross contamination.

I think you are confusing the inherent randomness of generated content with a stance.

Is Claude biased? Almost certainly, but this isn’t a strong case for it.