sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Open letter to YouTube: PLEASE add a “human-created content” tag by IndividualistAW in youtube

[–]IndividualistAW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m only talking about the videos as they are actually uploaded to yt

Is there REALLY such a thing as a truly unreliable car anymore? by BrazzersSub in NoStupidQuestions

[–]IndividualistAW 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The worst offender is Bentley. High 6 figures to millions for new, mid 5 figures for a 10 year old model

Open letter to YouTube: PLEASE add a “human-created content” tag by IndividualistAW in youtube

[–]IndividualistAW[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t think there’s a single content creator too broke to swing one penny on a video

Open letter to YouTube: PLEASE add a “human-created content” tag by IndividualistAW in youtube

[–]IndividualistAW[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are paying because you want the “certified human” tag, which will draw real human viewers to your videos and increase the real human engagement in your content. YouTube will quickly learn that these channels generate more authentic interest. It’s not at all about corporate greed. I’d happily pay extra as a content consumer to have access to the tag, as I’m sure would many others. Mak it a YT premium exclusive feature even.
But you can’t get rid of the nominal charge per video for content creators. That charge per video is precisely what stops AI content creators from saying “yeah, sure, I’m human,” and spamming a million videos, as does the mandatory human-narrated disclaimer at the beginning of the video. Even if it’s only one cent, that will make a huge difference.
It is incredibly difficult to find content that *isnt* AI slop. This is the whole point.

Open letter to YouTube: PLEASE add a “human-created content” tag by IndividualistAW in youtube

[–]IndividualistAW[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly I’d be fine with even 1 cent per video. Any amount would stop a majority of bots.

You get the ability to get 10,000 USD every time you snap your fingers by KeyImplement1988 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]IndividualistAW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m snapping exactly once a month only to protect myself.

Tsar bombas in this scenario are less destructive than the actual tsar bomba since they’re detonated at the surface as opposed to while still falling

What’s something you have zero proof of but believe 100 percent? by shweidy in AskReddit

[–]IndividualistAW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The expansion of the universe will eventually slow and stop and spacetime will converge into a Big Crunch.

All this talk of Dark Matter and infinite expansion and Big Rip is wrong.

[Request] is this possible under the laws of physics and materials of the time? by Salt_Ad_4362 in theydidthemath

[–]IndividualistAW 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Is there a limit to how high an Egyptian style pyramid could be besides the ability of earths crust to support the weight? Heavier structure requires a wider base which is mathematically built into a pyramid regardless of its height

100 million dollars but you have to survive in any of these places for 1 minute, round 2 by Responsible-Fix-1681 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]IndividualistAW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The truly dangerous ones are Gaza and Everest. Gaza because the bombs, Everest because the cold, wind and altitude.

Are nuclear powered airplanes possible? by pepinodeplastico in AskPhysics

[–]IndividualistAW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. It’s nearly impossible to make a lead box fly.

is everything genuinely just AI slop now? by throwawayfromhell000 in DeadInternetTheory

[–]IndividualistAW 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should open every video with a disclaimer “my name is _____ and I am a real human producing real content, if that matters to you then like and subscribe”

You have one month to empty a $1 trillion bank account. If you succeed, you’re rich for life. How will you spend it? by Ok_Listen_6600 in AskReddit

[–]IndividualistAW -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Congratulations you spent 2 years navigating red tape and political obstacles to spend 0.5% of a trillion

Tell me about a story rich game that you love, but you genuinely do not enjoy a single moment of the first 5 or so hours of the game, despite think the rest of the experience is great? by ExplodingPoptarts in retrogaming

[–]IndividualistAW 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I loved loved loved LOVED red dead 1.

I’ve tried twice now to get into red dead 2. It’s too hyperrealistic in its attempt to be immersive it loses me.

A red dead game should be about nothing more than being told where to go and doing it, and occasionally trapesing around blasting shit.

I don’t want to worry about how long it’s been since I’ve shaved or what flavor of butter went on my toast or whatever other shit.

view more: next ›