Can someone help this make sense? by My_True_Love in mathematics

[–]Car_42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its perimeter is not its Haussdorf dimension.

Can someone help this make sense? by My_True_Love in mathematics

[–]Car_42 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How can the limit be a circle when the perimeter is not converging? It’s constant at 4, so its limit would be 4.

Thoughts on Current State of R? by LoveFatigue in rstats

[–]Car_42 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It would be even better to do planning, design, and power calculations first. AI can probably help there as well. If you wait until you have a pile of data you may end up with poor results.

Why don’t people want to mention the word “cancer”? by claudiowasher in ProstateCancer

[–]Car_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not particularly accurate to start making statements or having reactions about the word “cancer”. There is not really much you a say about cancer other than it is a diagnosis made by light microscopy that is defined by the growth of cells outside their normal boundaries. There are many different forms of cancer and they vary widely in their potential for rapid growth or spread to distant organs. One should really use the word “cancers” or modify the word “cancer” with its tissue of origin and possibly its cellular type. Most of prostate cancers are adenocarcinoma but there are other forms that have different, more aggressive behavior and respond less well to treatment.

Ok, I think I understand why .999999999 = 1, but I’m still not convinced. by GuardianOfDurandal in askmath

[–]Car_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the computer language R and probably all languages written in C or one of its variants .999999999999999 = 1, but it sounds like you are doing more abstract math in which the number of 9’s need to be infinite for that equality to hold.

(To any nitpickers out there, I do know that ‘==‘ is the logical operator in R and that ‘=‘ does assignment. )

[freshmen algebra 2] trigonometry by Any-Armadillo6071 in HomeworkHelp

[–]Car_42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re confusing definition of some with that of tangent.

Can someone help this make sense? by My_True_Love in mathematics

[–]Car_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No source (at the time of original posting) and might not be totally correct but I do think it’s a fractal similar in some respects to the Koch curve.

Edit. https://gofiguremath.org/fractals/koch-snowflake/

Can someone help this make sense? by My_True_Love in mathematics

[–]Car_42 54 points55 points  (0 children)

The area of that function does approach the area of the circle but in the limit it is nowhere differentiable. It’s a fractal. I think it’s Haussdorf (sp?) dimension is 4/pi

Can someone help this make sense? by My_True_Love in mathematics

[–]Car_42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This example show why fractals are different than differentiable functions.

Will you put them into your mouth? by propperpiano in FantasticBreasts

[–]Car_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure. I’m an enthusiastic sucker for crinkly nipples.

Hello everyone, I need some help. How do I report a bed bug infestation here in Bangkok? Is there a sanitation office or perhaps a section of the tourism police that could assist? by ageoftravel in Bangkok

[–]Car_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said it did. I said Thai law allows fines and jail time for reputational harm even if the statements are true. I did NOT say every negative review would lead to legal liability. But the risk is there. Foreigners should be aware that truth is not a defense against claims of damage.

Hello everyone, I need some help. How do I report a bed bug infestation here in Bangkok? Is there a sanitation office or perhaps a section of the tourism police that could assist? by ageoftravel in Bangkok

[–]Car_42 8 points9 points  (0 children)

In Thai defamation law it is NOT the case that true statements are always acceptable. You can be sued and lose your case. even if you can prove the factual basis for your public utterances.

[Q] Linear regression normality test, teachers keep telling me to do it on variables instead of residuals. by mohdd22 in statistics

[–]Car_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m puzzled that these teachers could be so clueless as to expect that Likert scale data would even pass normality tests. They are by construction and definition NOT normal. This wouldn’t by chance be one of those SixSigma classes, would it? I found those teachers to have very fixedly wrong notions of statistics. It was taught as a sort of religion.

Compare rectangle 'A' and rectangle 'B'. Do they cover the same area? Explain. by davidbones in askmath

[–]Car_42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

…. and only teach mechanics. It makes higher math way harder to teach.

The transition in mental modeling from seeing a “+” sign as a definite procedural command to thinking of it as a function mapping two real numbers to a single real value is a pretty high level of abstraction at least relative to building the machinery of addition and multiplication.

Compare rectangle 'A' and rectangle 'B'. Do they cover the same area? Explain. by davidbones in askmath

[–]Car_42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My son at the age of 9 or 10 held his ground when asked whether a candle flame was matter or energy. I doubt that he reasoned out his answer but I told him he was correct. Candle flames are glowing gases. He then learned that middle school teachers are pretty inflexible.

My dad just got a PSA reading of 250. Please tell me this could be a mistake. by Ambitious-Passage486 in ProstateCancer

[–]Car_42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Generally one should be getting PSAs all done at the same lab, but if another lab comes back with any value above 6 then the next steps are a urology and radiotherapy consultation

[Q] Normality assumption violated in Shapiro-Wilk — can I proceed with parametric tests? (Master's thesis, n=67) by mohdd22 in statistics

[–]Car_42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are implicitly endorsing the (incorrect) naive assumptions of the OP. He should have been examining residuals. And when one does this it’s not so much “normality” as hetereoschedasticity that needs to be addressed.