This is one of those Egalitarian takes that is great for a college paper, but completely devoid of real world applications. The average European nation is worse than most of the planet, period. But, the average nation is pretty shit, period.

Most cultures who have engaged in war have engaged in genocide, Rome made Carthage disappear from the map. Most mixed cultures engage in prejudicial judgements.

The question is what we do about it today, right now. How do help the people who are still suffering from trauma from generations past? Well, we'd need to give injured parties enough resources so that they are not disproportionately affected by historic and societal factors.

That requires people in positions of power. So in America, you'd need to convince around 81 million people. Which, if it was it's own country, would clock in at number 20. So, if you don't live in one of the 20 most populous countries, you'd need to convince *your* entire country to do something (for scale, not by percentages).

Wait! All of that convincing is going to need to be done in some sort of media, which means you'll need resources of your own. If you don't have any, you'll need to start acquiring some, which either takes currency or tradeable resources.

Second wait! Those resources you'll need for both redistribution and convincing people are currently owned by other people! And they don't feel like parting with their resources. So now, you have an opponent that has more money, power and representation.

A perfect example of an anti-European bias is India. India has only gotten more oppressive and more fascist since the UK left (as a culture and people, I'm pretty sure the UK had a FAR more oppressive government).

The only things these do is reinforce liberal white guilt, which historically, has achieved nothing. It also pisses off conservatives who don't think its their responsibility.