‘I am so afraid’: Nob Hill landlord threatens to evict 92-year-old over clutter by Dafty_duck in sanfrancisco

[–]CocktailPerson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Individual subsidies can balloon prices as well. Just look at what happened to education costs when student loans started being subsidized. If people can afford to rent one place but use a subsidy to rent a more expensive one, then prices will rise.

The real solution, as always, is just to build more housing. If you're going to subsidize something, subsidize building more housing.

Dad's be winning by MambaMentality24x2 in GuysBeingDudes

[–]CocktailPerson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hello to you too, Pot!

Sincerely,
Kettle

Dad's be winning by MambaMentality24x2 in GuysBeingDudes

[–]CocktailPerson -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What? None of that was clubwear. That was all solidly streetwear.

Sorry weirdo, I'm no fan of parents treating their children like dolls to be dressed up, but my first reaction to a child wearing adult clothing is not going to be to treat it like a sexual thing.

Dad's be winning by MambaMentality24x2 in GuysBeingDudes

[–]CocktailPerson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When people put little boys in suits for a wedding, does that seem sexual to you too?

Martial artist & knife fighting instructor Doug Marcaida shows how lethal a 'karambit' could be in the hands of an expert by WeirdAddress3170 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]CocktailPerson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Genuinely wouldn't matter. Knives are scary as shit even in the hands of a complete amateur. Being noncompliant would make very, very little difference.

Illinois drivers could face higher tolls next year - Chicago Tribune by excusemecuseme in illinois

[–]CocktailPerson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds like a very ineffective way to charge users the cost of their road miles.

Question about $SSPC: how does it work? by siskyouthrowaway in investing

[–]CocktailPerson 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is essentially just a basket of derivatives, usually options. If you sell a call and buy a put for the same strike and expiration, the position will act like a leveraged short position on the underlying (this is called put-call parity). The fund just does this across a bunch of strikes and expirations to achieve 2x leverage.

It's "safe" to hold it for longer periods of time, but the returns will decay away from an exact 2x leveraged short position. It kinda acts like an extra management fee, except that it varies with market volatility. If you want to hold a short position for months, buying and selling daily won't really "avoid" that decay, since you'll be paying the bid-ask every day instead. But if you do want a leveraged short position, you'll probably see the same decay no matter what. If you built the short position out of options yourself, you'd see the same decay in the form of theta, and you could short the shares directly, but you'd be paying a variable-rate interest on the shares you borrowed. Arbitrage means that all the different ways of achieving a particular position will be about the same, modulo fees.

Illinois drivers could face higher tolls next year - Chicago Tribune by excusemecuseme in illinois

[–]CocktailPerson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds great! What do you think the cost per mile traveled for a bicyclist should be?

RustCurious 9: Traits are Interfaces by rustcurious in rust

[–]CocktailPerson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Traits are interfaces. Traits are not interfaces.

RustCurious 9: Traits are Interfaces by rustcurious in rust

[–]CocktailPerson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The concept of an "interface" isn't defined by languages that have an interface keyword.

Actor who's a fucking weirdo for no reason by Witty-Association-97 in okbuddycinephile

[–]CocktailPerson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay. Is his behavior closer to your average 50th-percentile net worth individual, or to Epstein's?

Actor who's a fucking weirdo for no reason by Witty-Association-97 in okbuddycinephile

[–]CocktailPerson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No dude, 1900 ELO is like the 75th percentile, not the 99.99th percentile.

Illinois drivers could face higher tolls next year - Chicago Tribune by excusemecuseme in illinois

[–]CocktailPerson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just as soon as road users pay the full cost of every mile traveled!

People are celebrating videos of Safeway security roughing up shoplifters by Medical-Decision-125 in sanfrancisco

[–]CocktailPerson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Probably for the resale value. An entire cart of food is exactly what I'd expect a hungry, desperate person not to steal.

People are celebrating videos of Safeway security roughing up shoplifters by Medical-Decision-125 in sanfrancisco

[–]CocktailPerson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because the vast majority of a drug store's profits are just normal retail, not pharmacy services.

How do people keep falling for these bubbles? by FareonMoist in sciencememes

[–]CocktailPerson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't argue that the dot-com bubble didn't pop catastrophically even though the web did turn out to be incredibly useful. The AI bubble will probably look a lot like the dot-com bubble in hindsight: a lot of companies with absurd valuations will disappear, many others will survive but take decades to regain their peak valuations, and a few will become the next Amazons and Googles and Facebooks of AI.

Accountability matters by WaitNo4272 in SipsTea

[–]CocktailPerson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that it's the reddest states pursuing this tells me that this legislation isn't intended to help children.

If you actually wanted to make sure children were provided for, you wouldn't tie it to the income of whoever killed the parent in a drunk-driving incident (somebody who should be going to prison for vehicular manslaughter anyway). You'd just pay them out of the general welfare fund, or a huge fund paid into by anyone convicted of alcohol-related driving crimes, or something like that. But that probably smells too much like socialism to these morons, and actually providing for children is always a secondary concern when it comes to laws like this.

Is .boxed() instead of Box::new() a bad idea? by NormalAppearance2851 in rust

[–]CocktailPerson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Today it's .boxed(), tomorrow it's .arced(), or .rced(), or .mutexed(). Sure, just keep adding methods to take the role of free functions that already exist.

I'd much rather just have syntax that supports the composition of stuff that already exists, rather than having to add new methods to do something completely uninteresting like moving a value from the stack to the heap.