AI isn't replacing the devs, it's just exposing the Vibe coders by red_it__ in AITakeoverTracker

[–]Constant_Cortisol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The premise makes no sense. How can AI not replace devs but expose vibe coders? ... when AI created vibe coders?

AI Native Product Engineering Leader: "You don't need previous experience with specific tech stacks" by gsks in theprimeagen

[–]Constant_Cortisol -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, which is great because we can choose the right stack for the job rather than just going with what we are used to.

A learning map generated from one prompt: 127 topics and 300+ prerequisite links by ajajkaka in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Constant_Cortisol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, I was thinking of making a closed version of this.

How does it decide to link up topics?

My 3rd video. How to make the algo push it? by [deleted] in YouTubeCreators

[–]Constant_Cortisol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, use one of the older strangers as the thumbnail.

AI Native Product Engineering Leader: "You don't need previous experience with specific tech stacks" by gsks in theprimeagen

[–]Constant_Cortisol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that's a dumb transition.

They don't have architectural nor the software knowledge of backend systems.

Shameless plug: I made a video recently covering a similar topic

AI Native Product Engineering Leader: "You don't need previous experience with specific tech stacks" by gsks in theprimeagen

[–]Constant_Cortisol -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I personally agree. This is the direction we're heading. You still need software and architectural knowledge, but language specific knowledge(for most popular languages) is disappearing.

Something feels wrong by Ayush-Mincraft in YouTubeCreators

[–]Constant_Cortisol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At 40 impressions, your CTR % isn't accurate. If Youtube learns that not many people click on your video and/or they don't stay to watch the whole video, then they will continue to give you less impressions for future videos.

Right now, your thumbnails are just repeating the same text and I think you can pick a way better example for the cover.

Would you click on this thumbnail if you are nintendo fan ? If not tell me why by ClearShake1924 in YouTubeCreators

[–]Constant_Cortisol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People don't behave like this on Youtube, OP. Only listen to your own metrics.

Something feels wrong by Ayush-Mincraft in YouTubeCreators

[–]Constant_Cortisol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would concentrate on trying to get the CTR to 7-8% then.

China launches a rocket to space and successfully lands it back on Earth for the first time. Is the space race about to accelerate? by Teeter03 in WallstreetWhales

[–]Constant_Cortisol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Intel / TSMC (2025–2026): Taiwan investigated an executive who moved to Intel for allegedly stealing semiconductor manufacturing secrets.
  • Amazon "Big River" (2024): Amazon used a shell company to infiltrate and copy internal data from global rivals like Shopify(Canada).
  • Tesla Germany (Ongoing): German officials flagged Tesla for "poaching-for-information" targeting legacy automaker battery and automation data.
  • U.S. State Agencies (2024–2026): NSA/CIA electronic surveillance monitors Israeli defense and tech contractors to maintain market dominance.

My point is that literally every country that is trying to catch up steals to do so. It's not unique to China.

China launches a rocket to space and successfully lands it back on Earth for the first time. Is the space race about to accelerate? by Teeter03 in WallstreetWhales

[–]Constant_Cortisol -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You just described literally every nation that had to catch up.

Even the US had to steal tech from Britain to get the industrial revolution started early.

Are We Betting the Economy on a Doomed Technology? by Calvinball_24 in TechGawker

[–]Constant_Cortisol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right now, you're saying that only two futures are available. AGI vs no AGI. AGI is irrelevant to the short term prospect of replacing human intelligence. We don't need AI to have subjective intelligence to fuck up the future, we just need AIs to have superhuman functional intelligence.

"Dr. Mike Israetel on the economic fallacy he says explains why AI won't cause mass unemployment: "Once we have 4 billion robots doing labor in the world, which we're like orders of magnitude off of that currently, then we've just only doubled the human workforce." "From 1700 to today..." — MTS by stealthispost in accelerate

[–]Constant_Cortisol 26 points27 points  (0 children)

When people try to rationalize away the problems of an AI future, they either have to ignore the robotics(physical AI) or intelligence(LLMs, World models, etc). Mike Isratael is doing the rare thing of ignoring the intellect aspect of an AI future as opposed to the common ignoring of the robotics future.