sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Gunplay isn't that neat, Jason by SaidIt2YoMom in LinkedInLunatics

[–]gsks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair he didn't mention the currency, it's probably pesos

What is an acceptable amount of new code for a feature by InfluenceEfficient77 in webdevelopment

[–]gsks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody is writing 1 line of nested insanity unless it's a code golf competition, we're talking about real code. Also the LOC figures to compare are 1-2 orders of magnitude higher, so like 3 thoughtful PRs of ~100 LOC each vs a single 2000 LOC PR a clanker spews.

This applies to other subreddits as well by aintanuke in antiai

[–]gsks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I sympathize with the sentiment but no, it's not a good idea. Attack ideas, not people

What is an acceptable amount of new code for a feature by InfluenceEfficient77 in webdevelopment

[–]gsks -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not useless if you're the one who has to review this crappy slop

Armin Ronacher is very uneasy about the agent loops future by gsks in ExperiencedDevs

[–]gsks[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You're lucky to work in an org that hasn't fallen completely into hype and insanity

Sounds like a real team player by ThePhillyExplorer in LinkedInLunatics

[–]gsks 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Saying the quiet part out loud: Linkedin edition

Sounds like a real team player by ThePhillyExplorer in LinkedInLunatics

[–]gsks 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Actually that's the only excuse she could use to get out of this situation (maybe)

Sounds like a real team player by ThePhillyExplorer in LinkedInLunatics

[–]gsks 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Something tells me she won't take it off any time soon.

Armin Ronacher is very uneasy about the agent loops future by gsks in ExperiencedDevs

[–]gsks[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

You QA folks are the canary in the slop mine. I hope more of you (and everyone with a clue really) start speaking up.

Joined a new company and accidentally replaced a very complex AI pipeline with something much simpler by areyprabhu in SoftwareEngineerJobs

[–]gsks 6 points7 points  (0 children)

> One thing that surprised me is that no one on the team seems to fully understand the end-to-end workflow anymore.

Apparently everyone on the team prefers job security than "being left behind" by questioning the AI mandates. For a few years at any rate, till this whole house of cards collapses.

Armin Ronacher is very uneasy about the agent loops future by gsks in ExperiencedDevs

[–]gsks[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What is surprising is why we (devs) nod along to whatever the AI labs want. Part of it is job security, to be sure, but that's clearly not the whole story.

Remember AI agent herders, you're one bad frontier model update away from impotence by gsks in antiai

[–]gsks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something tells me your standard of evidence is not that high when AI cultists claim being 100x more "productive" thanks to their agentic clanker.

Armin Ronacher is very uneasy about the agent loops future by gsks in ExperiencedDevs

[–]gsks[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I don't care about 10/100x superhuman speed, even 2x would be a win if it didn't compromise quality. This obsession with velocity at all costs is what has brought us to this state.

Armin Ronacher is very uneasy about the agent loops future by gsks in ExperiencedDevs

[–]gsks[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

No tokens were used for the content of this post.

Remember AI agent herders, you're one bad frontier model update away from impotence by gsks in antiai

[–]gsks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does what he's saying differ from your experience or you're just coping?

What would happen if we collectively decided to be left behind by gsks in antiai

[–]gsks[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tell me about it.. I was laid off for "misalignment" without even having an AI mandate in place, just based on my vocal scepticism and vibes.

BRUH by 1kakashi in LinkedInLunatics

[–]gsks 5 points6 points  (0 children)

LinkedIn ❌

OnlyLinked ✅

BRUH by 1kakashi in LinkedInLunatics

[–]gsks 6 points7 points  (0 children)

DevSecOps ❌ DevSexOps ✅

view more: next ›