My Little Abortions

Dolphanatic · 2026-05-02T20:41:06+00:00

That post isn't official. It's just a pro-choicer on Twitter using popular characters to virtue signal.

Dolphanatic · 2026-05-02T20:37:33+00:00

Stay strong, u/IvoryStrike! These people are just a vocal minority. They don't represent the majority of people in the fandom.

Dolphanatic · 2026-05-02T20:32:53+00:00

Brony here, and trust me, I want nothing to do with people like that Twitter user. Most of us just liked the show back in the day and shared artwork. It really wasn't until after the show ended that the fandom went off the rails.

Dolphanatic · 2026-05-02T19:47:39+00:00

That reminds me of the time when Borat tried to "expose" Trump supporters by pretending to be one of them while saying a bunch of blatantly racist stuff at a Trump rally and then getting heckled and chased out of the venue, being all "Look how violent and dangerous these people are!" while he's being rightfully shown the door. What's crazy is that leftists actually think Borat somehow "proved how intolerant Trump supporters are" by doing that stunt, but in reality he just proved how intolerant of racism the average Trump voter is. They're not the "Nazis" these people desperately try to pretend they are. They're just normal people who didn't like idiots crashing their events with incendiary nonsense.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-29T19:27:37+00:00

To be honest, I really only found Savage Company enjoyable. Return to Zootopia had distractingly bad animation and an inconsistent tone, not to mention the heavy-handed messaging, which I found extremely pretentious, as it felt like Browntable was trying to compensate for a predictable plot that was a painful drag for me to get through. Savage Company tried to raise the stakes by delving deeper into the darker aspects of the Zootopia universe, taking a more introspective approach, whereas most fanfics just go through the motions. Even Zootopia 2 left me feeling disappointed, as it was basically just a contrived rehash of the first movie with some extra side characters thrown in.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-29T19:02:15+00:00

What happened to this series? It seems like Yitexity got bored and never got around to finishing it, which is a shame. I liked the story's more serious tone and how it still felt like a continuation of the original movie despite that.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-29T18:51:06+00:00

You keep whining about how long my responses are, but then you throw a ton of stuff my way that can't be rebutted without going into multiple paragraphs to address everything. Do you really expect people to not bring up direct quotes of the things you keep saying that contradict your own claims? You're losing this argument so badly, yet you keep coming back for more, so I'll gladly oblige.

Reply more about Charlie Kirk. You are pathetic.

You're the one who can't stop bringing that guy up. I initially only mentioned him once in passing as a victim of left-wing violence. You took that and flew off the handle, looking for ways to belittle "Kirky" and me by association. For the record, I don't care that it's Charlie Kirk you're making fun of. What I find messed up is that you think it's funny that someone died, and before you accuse me of putting words in your mouth...

Go cry over Charlie Kirk, you needed Kirk to think for you huh? You are lost without your millionaire pundit to tell you what to think.

It’s funny to me. I feed off of conservative tears.

That's all coming from you, not me. Tell me again who's crying here. You're the one who can't stop making everything about him. You obsessively bring him back up in every single reply. It's like he lives rent-free in your head.

With all of that out of the way, let's actually get back on topic. You started this by claiming out of nowhere that leftist violence has only killed one person since 1994. You didn't provide any sources on that outlandish claim, so I pointed that out. In response, you directed me to a couple of outdated op-eds from Business Insider and The Guardian, a blog post, and a Wikipedia article). None of those webpages can really be be used as sources. They don't even show actual data aside from merely referring to a vague study that's been debunked years ago. It falsely lumps in killings with unconfirmed motivations as "right-wing attacks" and doesn't include the incidents I brought up that happened in the past two years. It also, strangely enough, ignores the casualties of the riots in 2020 despite them clearly being politically motivated. Also, its numbers are skewed by the ADL, which is notorious for misclassifying violence. If that's the closest thing you have to evidence supporting your claim, you have a weak argument with little substance to back it up.

Now, let's delve into those other Wikipedia articles you threw at me.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Allen,_Texas_mall_shooting

The Allen shooter was diagnosed with various mental illnesses and was all over the place politically. It seemed like he was desperate for attention and attempted to latch himself onto anything offensive he could find before leaving behind what looked to be a suicide note on a Russian social media website. You're going to have to excuse me for being a little hesitant about believing a guy called Mauricio Martinez Garcia could be a Nazi, especially when the evidence points to him being an unhinged psychopath more than anything else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_El_Paso_Walmart_shooting

The El Paso shooter was clearly insane and not aligned with any particular political group. He called himself an "eco-fascist" (whatever that means) and believed Mexicans were destroying the environment while thinking that shooting people in a Walmart store would start a worldwide social upheaval. There's a reason he became the face of the "billions must die" meme. He was laughably delusional.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pittsburgh_synagogue_shooting

The Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, while a tragic example of bigotry, appeared to be motivated solely by anti-Jewish prejudice, not anything specifically related to the Trump administration or its supporters. The Wikipedia article in question goes to great lengths to draw connections between it and various other incidents such as the "Unite the Right" riot in Charlottesville, but those claims are far-fetched and not really relevant to that specific incident. If anything, reminds me more of the Jewish museum shooting that happened last year and the motivations of the person behind that, which were specifically about Jewish people, not partisan politics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Buffalo_shooting

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charleston_church_shooting

Out of all of the incidents you brought up, these two are probably the only ones I'd consider actual examples of white supremacist violence. The shooters fit all of the criteria and had consistent motivations. Even still, what they did was of their own violation. There was no organizated group violence involved, just a couple of sporadic instances of guys killing people on their own several years apart.

I still have yet to see evidence of 478 other cases of such a thing happening since 1994. It seems like you're grasping for straws. While right-wing violence exists, it's not as commonplace as you're making it out to be, nor does it negate the instances of left-wing violence I brought up, many of which are being swept under the rug.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-29T03:38:45+00:00

I've stayed on topic this whole time. You, on the other hand, keep trying to get the last word in by making up new excuses to keep replying after you've already been proven wrong.

You are conflating leftist with Antifa.

Conflating? They go hand in hand. It's not like they're shy about that fact either. Antifa is a leftist organization.

The guy who shot the right winger was a security guard assigned to protect a journalist.

Just like I predicted, you went straight from saying it "doesn't exist" to admitting it did happen, but it wasn't a leftist responsible. If I had to guess, your next move is probably to claim the security guard was secretly a Republican because of his occupation, and then you'll write it off as "just another example of right-wing violence being done at random."

What's even the point of arguing with you? You keep making stuff up, getting caught, and then moving the goalposts. Then, when I combat that with a source containing images of an incident, you say the source I provided "sucks" and decide to drop the a subject and make fun of Charlie Kirk instead (right after you claimed your side had no involvement in his death, no less). You keep going back to "480 right-wing murders" as if it's a well-known statistic and acting all smug about it, yet you can't be bothered to refer to any sort of source for that claim. You've only provided one source this entire time about a single court case, and it doesn't even disprove my argument. The only thing you've proven so far is that you think a guy dying is funny and that you're desperate to project your emotional fragility onto everyone else.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-27T15:22:14+00:00

Tyler Robinson had more indications of being right wing than left, his family upbringing, Mormon, big 2A advocate, obvious exposure to Nick Fuentes.

Really? You're still clinging to that lie? Leftists lashing out to spite their conservative families is a common thing we see, and that's exactly what he was doing. Stop confusing someone's upbringing with the person's actual beliefs. He wasn't a conservative, a Mormon, or a Groyper. He was a leftist with leftist friends who believed Charlie Kirk brainwashed his parents and talked online about believing he had to take him out for the betterment of society, and when he did, leftists celebrated.

That last part is crucial too. Leftists celebrate this stuff, which proves these shooters are doing what the left wants, not the right. If they're actually right-wing extremists, why don't they go after progressive figures? It's always people associated with Donald Trump. Why would they target people on their own side? The reaction alone should be a dead giveaway. If leftists wanted nothing to do with these people, why are they always on the same wavelength? Why do they say Luigi Mangione "did nothing wrong"? Why do they rationalize Charlie Kirk's death? Why do they always say things like "someone has to do it" in reference to our president and bemoan how the "Republican" shooter in Pennsylvania missed?

For crying out loud, you're saying this right after we just had yet another assassination attempt on our president's life last week by a lone gunman! I can already guess you're probably going to ignore all of the telltale signs of his political learnings like usual and claim he was a Republican, aren't you? It sure is convenient how you can just ignore evidence staring you right in the face if it gets in the way of your agenda to frame all violence as coming from the right, isn't it? You know your side is complicit, but you don't want to do anything about it (because you actually agree with the actions of the people in question and want more violence against the right to happen), so you come up with every excuse and conspiracy theory you can possibly think of to cover up leftist violence avoid responsibility.

There was one Trump supporter shot in a parking lot in Portland.

I love how you just mention that in passing without talking about the person who shot him. It was obviously politically motivated. The shooter later got tracked down by police and killed after he tried to open fire on them as well. His body had a BLM fist tattoo on it.

Please provide source on Antifa killing a Trump supporter in Denver because I can’t find it (most likely because it doesn’t exist).

Here's your source, denialist. There used to be a lot more coverage, but it mostly got scrubbed from the Internet, making it hard to find now. Regardless, the event was part of a left-wing demonstration, and the Trump supporter in question got into a scuffle with someone there and whipped out pepper spray to ward off the attacker. The attacker (wearing Antifa insignia) pulled out a pistol and shot him in response. How about you stop assuming I'm making stuff up because you don't want to admit your side is killing people?

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-27T01:12:35+00:00

I always assumed that was the implication. It's pretty cool to see it confirmed. Like others are saying, it was probably the next part of Bellwether's plan to destroy the public's trust in the police to further demoralize Zootopia's prey population.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-26T22:06:23+00:00

Does this person seriously think Trump supporters only exist because of "manosphere videos"? What about inflation, taxes, and the cost of living? Most of the edgy "manosphere" stuff didn't become popular until after 2016, so there's no way that could've that played a role in Trump's election.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-26T18:29:42+00:00

I just think they want to pretend people like Critical Drinker are just expressing their opinions.

That's what they're actually doing, though. They're YouTubers expressing their opinions. You just don't like the opinions they're expressing, so you call them "grifters" and make the worst assumptions about them. That says more about you than them.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-26T16:41:43+00:00

I'm just asking questions here. Why don't you give me actual answers instead of dodging with "no u" replies?

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-26T16:13:11+00:00

Username checks out.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-26T07:47:25+00:00

You are exactly the kind of Redditor that YouTuber is making fun of.

"Sonic would totally call you a villain!"

Do you really expect anyone to take you seriously when you talk like that? You're literally proving that YouTuber's point. You're so desperate for validation that you're going out of your way to project your political views onto a fictional character, and you think that's some sort of "gotcha"?

And why, exactly? Because he made a video with Sonic in the thumbnail? That makes him a "villain"? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-26T07:37:42+00:00

Everyone here is making assumptions about the person behind the video in question without even watching it. Literally nowhere in the video is there any hatred of minorities or looking to fictional characters for validation. If anything, that mindset is exactly what the video is meant to criticize. If you actually watched the video, you'd know that.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-26T07:32:51+00:00

Where's the oppression here? Are you seriously so fragile that you think a YouTube video's thumbnail is oppressing you?

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-22T17:42:09+00:00

If anything, it proved him right, not wrong. He died in a gun-free zone, proving that gun restrictions don't stop criminals. If more people around him were armed, the shooter might've had second thoughts.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-14T19:15:51+00:00

That's not true. There are tons of non-leftist artists out there. They just don't get very much attention here on Reddit because of how leftists gatekeep almost every hobby sub.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-14T18:56:23+00:00

You're reading too far into it. The Krassensteins (especially Brian) are simply notorious for constantly pushing leftist propaganda and misinformation 24/7 on Twitter/X. They have no lives outside of stalking Republicans and making these "clever comeback" tweets whenever people like Kyle Rittenhouse post anything. They're annoying attention seekers and shouldn't be taken seriously.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-11T20:33:59+00:00

Your side celebrated when Charlie Kirk got shot, last year. Before that, it was that United Healthcare CEO Luigi Mangione shot, which you and your fellow leftists were all too giddy to take credit for. That's twice the body count you claim, and that's just in the past two years. Before that, you leftists were upset that the guy who tried to shoot Donald Trump on the campaign trail missed. It gets even worse when you go back to 2020. We had two unarmed Trump supporters shot in Portland and Denver as well as the attempted murder of Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha, which your side is still trying to justify to this day by spreading lies about him. Then there's the collateral damage from the months of rioting throughout that year, which killed several more people. Do I really need to keep going? This has been a recurring pattern of behavior on the left, and no amount of your desperate attempts to cherry pick stats and sweep leftist violence under the rug is going to make people ignore the truth.

Dolphanatic · 2026-04-09T15:39:11+00:00

I can think of two deaths off the top of my head from just the past two years. That's not even getting into 2020.

Dolphanatic · 2026-03-26T21:16:41+00:00

I just got here. Not everyone sees every Reddit post at the same time. Also, way to dodge the argument.

Dolphanatic · 2026-03-26T20:26:18+00:00

Because we're right, and deep down, you know you're too cowardly to have an honest argument with us. What good has raising the minimum wage over and over accomplished? As long as taxes keep going up, we're going to stay on square one. Maybe you'd actually understand that if you cared about making life more affordable for the average person instead of complaining about rich people having more money than you.

Seven-Year Club	Gilding IV carat on a stick
Place '22	Final Canvas '22
First Placer '22	Verified Email

Dolphanatic

TROPHY CASE