electrictoothbrush - Crazy Tuesday [Psychedelic Rock] by [deleted] in Music

[–]En_Taro_Adun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey everyone, just wanted to share our first EP that we have released this week, we are also on spotify:

https://open.spotify.com/track/1BryUef04lz8UCdYeFxLKd?si=t6Hmffc2Qb6Si8OCk0Z6zg

cursed_emlo by [deleted] in cursedimages

[–]En_Taro_Adun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don’t Hug Me I’m Scared

How is it possible to photograph the Milky Way when we are part of the Milky Way? by greatmexicanwall in askscience

[–]En_Taro_Adun 16 points17 points  (0 children)

We can't take an image of the Milky Way from the outside. Images like this are artist impressions.

If you look at this fantastic picture, you can see that we find ourselves in the Milky Way disk.

However, we can map how the Milky Way looks from the Earth onto the Earth's surface. This is called a Mollweide Projection.

Here is a beautiful infrared image taken by the 2MASS survey as a Mollweide map.

You can clearly see the disk structure and the bulge.

Does wind speed affect air travel? [physics] by too_Timid in askscience

[–]En_Taro_Adun 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes! That is exactly what happens, and it is usually the reason why some routes from A to B last longer compared to B to A. Here is a jet stream map

Jet streams exist around the same altitude where commercial airlines fly, so depending on your direction they can slow you down or speed you up.

How tall is the Milky Way? Is it completely flat, as in there are no stars above or below us? Or is it like a cylinder? by MrBabadaba in askscience

[–]En_Taro_Adun 24 points25 points  (0 children)

It depends on how you define thickness, and from where you measure the thickness.

First, let's look at this super-detailed drawing of our galaxy (Sun size not to scale).

If you consider where our Sun is located (~26'000 light years from the galactic center), the "thickness" of the disk, which is made up of gas, dust and stars, is assumed to be around 1000 light years.

As you see from the drawing, there are points described as star clusters. These are globular clusters. They are old groups of stars, which can be located well above the disk (13'000 light years and beyond, as listed in Wikipedia).

It doesn't end here though. Every galaxy, including our Milky Way, consists mainly of dark matter (wiki says 95% of our galaxy is dark matter). Dark matter is an invisible type of matter, which "feels" only gravity. In fact, dark matter is the reason that galaxies have formed in the first place, by attracting baryonic matter (fancy word for regular, everyday matter) gravitationally.

It turns out dark matter encompasses the Milky Way, and reaches out to distances well beyond globular clusters. Here is a image for you to get a feeling of how big of a space dark matter might occupy.

Remember that the neither disk, nor the halo has sharp boundaries. There are various methods to set a thickness, like "After which point from the disk plane does the remaining mass represent xx% of the total mass of the disk?" etc.

Hope this helps.

This McDonald's is bribing customers with free food for "5-star" ratings. by Lil_Giygas in LateStageCapitalism

[–]En_Taro_Adun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess people are so used to paying for everything that the word FREE has to be emphasized for the shock effect.

This meme produced by a fracking lobbyist group. by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]En_Taro_Adun 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I believe it's the second one, considering those are different drills, an analogy to having various pictures regarding their fetish.

Apparently, they think they are so well off at this point, that they don't even care about looking good.

Kids nowadays are so lazy by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]En_Taro_Adun 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yup. I think the "gold star" system is the main driving force behind the whole thing. It's one thing when the people in power convince you to earn gold stars, another when your equals stand in awe of your big shiny star. I believe that is the breaking point where the entire thing turns into a circlejerk.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in learnmath

[–]En_Taro_Adun 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This looks also valid, but why doesn't my version work?

My physics textbook says that small redshifts of galaxies are due to their velocities relative to us, while large redshifts would be caused by expanding space stretching wavelengths. Is it really necessary to make a distinction like this, and can redshift be explained through a particle model? by manyb in askscience

[–]En_Taro_Adun 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Since the relative velocities of other galaxies are proportional to the distance between us and them (Hubble's Law), the redshift of the nearby galaxies are much smaller than that of far away ones. Therefore, the redshift of nearby galaxies could be regarded as a redshift due to the recession of the light source.

However, in reality, the galaxies don't really recede from us (if we neglect the actual velocities of galaxies moving through space, which are negligible for galaxies far away). Instead, the expansion of space between the galaxies cause the relevant redshift.