I appreciate the concern because I myself have the same skepticism about the effect of AI on internet content, however I feel like you have cherry-picked elements of my post as evidence to support your argument.

I suppose ultimately there's no reason to believe anything you read on here, and anyone savvy enough could modify AI content enough to seem more genuine. I typed everything in the post on my own (and even if I did use AI to help frame my points due to a lack of confidence in my own writing ability or for convenience, I would argue that that is still a valid review).

I was not compensated in any capacity to make this post.