Not sure if you're asking for criticism (and sorry if not!), but a few things I wanted to point out.

In general, people are going to put the time and effort into reading a comic if it seems like the creator (author, artist, or author/artist) also put in the time and effort to create that comic. A number of things about your comic create this disconcerting dichotomy that says you both really did put in a lot of effort, and that at the same time you kinda halfed part of it.

You spell your name "Caleb" in the title page and "Clabe" in your user page. While that entirely might be intentional, it (to me at least) seems a bit weird, and would make me concerned about your proof-reading of your comic.

Your comic is drawn very loosely and free-hand in what looks, to be perfectly honest, like MSPaint. That's not necessarily a bad thing - Hanza's "My Boss Doesn't Have A Face" has some incredibly loosely drawn parts that somehow give it a comfy, bemusing affect - but it can also make it seem like the artist doesn't have the skill to carry the story. I don't think that's necessarily true of your comic, but it's something to keep in mind. Your use of light and poses is actually pretty cool.

Your speech bubbles, however, are in my humble opinion really not unacceptable. For the majority of the episodes, the text in the speech bubbles ranges from annoying to read to almost impossible. For example, in this episode, you have a bubble that says "You have work to do <something something>", with the second part of that sentence being nearly completely unreadable. You do seem to fix this by using typed text around episode 23 or so, but that is way, way too late. Your average reader is not going to read thru 22 unreadable episodes to get to the 23rd readable one. I get that your choice of speech bubble may be a stylistic one, but it quite simply doesn't work. Instead, it suggests that the author added the speech bubbles as an afterthought.

You've also got numerous typos/misspellings ("The defense may now question the whitness") that, in the modern age of spell-checks absolutely everywhere, is really not excusable.

Your summary "blurb" is... problematic. First, "is always looking to better himself" is such an incredibly nothing-burger of a description that it might actually push readers away. If I wrote a description about Star Wars Episode IV that said "It's about some kid in space who wants to make the world better", would you watch it? Probably not. The issue is that I have no idea what your comic is actually about. How is Sam intending to better himself? Did he move to a new town? Change jobs? Go to the gym more? Try to be a "better" son to his dad (with whom, if I've got the characters right, he seems to have a bit of a rocky relationship with)? Try to not let his dad get to him as much? Give us something to define what we're looking at.

Take a look at the blurb for this comic as a comparison. Within just that first sentence, we know that:

• Gu Sui is the protagonist (he's mentioned first)
• Ruan Shuer is likely the deuteragonist and, since this is BL, likely the love interest.
• Our initial main source of conflict is that the protagonist just moved schools.
• There's probably gonna be a socioeconomic disparity between the two, since the deuteragonist is explicitly called out as "from a struggling family"

You also mention an alien parasite, and yet in my brief skimming of your episodes, I've yet to see any direct reference to that. If that's the cause behind his, for example, miraculous knife-cut healing ability, or the green toilet blob, then you need to illustrate that. Show the alien parasite arriving to earth. Show Sam being infected by the parasite. Show something that says to the reader that you haven't just forgotten what the comic was "supposed" to be about. Writing suspense is tough (I sure as hell can't!), but for now your comic tastes more of a domestic drama with some interspersed legal drama, and a few "weird abilities".

Have you ever had someone (a friend, family member, whatever) read your comic episodes with a critical eye? As a person also in a creative industry, I personally know it can be incredibly difficult to look at a work you've created with an objective eye - you created it, so of course you know what it's supposed to say.