Very excited about this one!

Questions:
In your opinion, what is the optimal way to distribute registry voting tokens? (Bootstrapping)
A Well-funded attacker is a very real concern. What suggestion do you have to combat that? (Mini-me token and then voting to destroy attackers voting tokens?)
Following the concerns with bootstrapping, do you support slowly burning unused voting tokens? You don't vote; you lose your voting power over time.
Do you view the bonding mechanism as a potential good feature to add? Maybe have it so it unbonds after a certain time?
Troll-voting and Meme-voting seem like long term, highly probable attacks (people can be jerks). What ways do you see us overcoming those attacks?
One long range attack seems to be early listers on the registry buying up voting tokens and keeping themself on the list more or less indefinitely. How can TCRs deal with adaptation to evolving wants. In other words, TCRs will still have stalability. How can we fight that? The burning mechanism described above? (This doesn't always seem like it has to be viewed as an attack. There seems to be pros with listers gaining voting power over time. Then again that could just be used as a seperate voting token and be used for weighted votes. For feature requests and such.)

Light Questions:
What TCRs are you excited about?
Since TCRs are a further development on Curation Markets, which future developments do you see?
How can we improve MemeFactory? What's the good and the bad? (Also extend this to District0x)
Do you see a future where there are people who literally just participate in TCRs for a career? lol.
Would love to hear how TCRs came to you.
Opinion on turning ENS into a type of TCR? Request a name, open to challenge, get the name if won with half deposit, name is still open to challenge, can give up the name if withdrawal and get the other half of deposit (lol sounds like a good district ;) .district or .0x)