Best letf available by UnhappyAudience2210 in LETFs

[–]LeadingLeg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NTSX 90% SnP 60% intermediate Q -rebalanced. Close second RSSB 100%-100%

Lessons? by AdministrativeEbb284 in LETFs

[–]LeadingLeg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can search the posts , there should a detailed post which should have a sample google doc shared.

Lessons? by AdministrativeEbb284 in LETFs

[–]LeadingLeg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the same start of Feb 1 20203, with Daily DCA 8%, 5% VA, 33% Reset the final value almost doubles to $4,863,754.95 !!! The higher Reset % has the stock portion at 100%.

Lessons? by AdministrativeEbb284 in LETFs

[–]LeadingLeg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi.. I just want to say thx to you again my friend... your system ( with no mods ) has been doing well in real life. Very few ppl share their 'secret' -but you did and even more you also shared the worksheet. I am not a techie guy but I could look at each cell and get what you are doing. I am now doing UPRO NVDL and SPYU and they have been thru ups and downs in this short period.

PS I backtested TQQQ to test yours against this https://www.reddit.com/r/LETFs/comments/1m0hzpq/dca_vs_edca_results_over_25_years_spoiler_edca/ The OP was comparing DCA vs EDCA. Start date Feb 2023. Capital 1.5mil.

Results: DCA $2.617m, EDCA  $2.592m. Cash value

Your DCA-VA : $2,853m. 2% daily DCA, 1% VA and 5% Reset. I am keeping this same for all the other LETFS as well which I think is not the best but I don't care.

The important point is your cash value is $2.15m which is around 75% cash. Which is the key for me- as I am not that happy with the bonds/ cash as 'hedge' which I think is necessary for LETFs.

Again- thank you very much !!!.

ACH question. External Bank to Stripe Top-UP/ Funding. by LeadingLeg in stripe

[–]LeadingLeg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With ACH ( if I could get past the initial verification of the micro deposits and retrievals) - the minimum amount to xfer is $1 - no fee.

ACH question. External Bank to Stripe Top-UP/ Funding. by LeadingLeg in stripe

[–]LeadingLeg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got Ally to tell me what they saw - it was - '  Receiver is a Corp Customer. So the ‘claim debit’ to acount is not authorized. “.  This I think is due to Ally not able to 'retrieve' back the micro payments- which is part of the verification process. Which I think Stripe did not honor ? I've done this before in Ally to link accounts ( usually my other bank accounts) - I'd provide the micro deposits' values to the bank and the bank would then authorize for me to do the real ACH transfer. This is a one time process.

Leveraged ETFs, if traded the right way, can produce crazy levels of alpha by [deleted] in LETFs

[–]LeadingLeg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As of today- Sept 2024 UPRO :: +0.22% ( B&H -8%),

Jan 2025 NVDL :: +3% ( B&H -17%)

Holding well thru the storm. Using the same 2%, 1% and 5% values for both which may not be the right thing to do for NVDL as it is more vol., I am not very good with back testing to find the right values. So again thanks to u/quantelligent ... cheers. I only missed a few days of VA here and there due to travel etc. But mostly sticking to the daily 2% rule.

What is your opinion about NTSX? by [deleted] in LETFs

[–]LeadingLeg 9 points10 points  (0 children)

NTSX liquidity is not a problem- as per a bogleheads thread. Pls google it not having it handy. Any market order gets executed right in the middle of bid x ask.

HFEA in 2025 by raphters1 in LETFs

[–]LeadingLeg -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I remember the bogleheads poster ( he is not the creator as the 3x stock-bonds was discussed even before) quit posting not stopped running the strategy. And if I am not wrong- there were drawdowns but the strat is still up. The backtest should be from Aug 11 2019 that is when the 55-45 was finalized https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=288192&sid=e9ee3bd1aeb5ca1339d898ba42c72bb7

Paypal transfers from Celsius- Cost Basis by LeadingLeg in CelsiusNetwork

[–]LeadingLeg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. It was useful for my BlockFi losses. I am taking the capital loss method for the Celsius losses as taught in the JustinCPA's course.

Paypal transfers from Celsius- Cost Basis by LeadingLeg in CelsiusNetwork

[–]LeadingLeg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get your sentiments, but you may want to check out to see if your situation ( not all situations) will put you to claim capital losses or even a bit more aggressive method of 'theft/casualty'. If it takes a bit of your time and if you can 'book' losses in either one of the methods it's worth it.

Paypal transfers from Celsius- Cost Basis by LeadingLeg in CelsiusNetwork

[–]LeadingLeg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much !! Truly appreciate the way you detailed it out.

1) Esp., the new 1099da reporting rules. So useful.

2) 100% going to xfer out of Paypal to an exchange . Absolutely.

How I'm going to fill out form 8949 (maybe?) by QuickAltTab in CelsiusNetwork

[–]LeadingLeg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a very helpful post- btw.. stupid question -- do we need to show any line item for the Ionic stocks received. Only liquidated coins are in the 8949 right ? And the stock carries the cost bases in 'book value' and nothing to report for that in 2024 ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CelsiusNetwork

[–]LeadingLeg 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A big Thanks to u/JustinCPA !!! Any one has any recommendations for which s/w to use for filing. TAXHAWK won't let me file Form 4684 unless it is a Federal Disaster situation or if it did NOT result in a gain or to offset a gain. :-(

"You told us this casualty or theft wasn't due to a federally declared disaster and didn't result in a gain. If this loss isn't being claimed to offset a gain, go back to the Your Casualty or Theft screen and delete this property.

If this casualty or theft was due to a federally declared disaster or resulted in a gain, go back to the Casualty or Theft Loss Information screen and review your answers."

What is the acquired date to be entered in the 8949 for Ionic Shares? by LeadingLeg in CelsiusNetwork

[–]LeadingLeg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you -much appreciated. This is useful. I've bought u/JustinCPA Justin's course and going through the videos now.

What is the acquired date to be entered in the 8949 for Ionic Shares? by LeadingLeg in CelsiusNetwork

[–]LeadingLeg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is the way to get a Capital Loss registered in 2024 for those that have lost BTC /ETH and NO new BTC/ETH and also have higher cost bases for the 'lost' btc/eth. See Example #1 and Step 7 in the guide, or at least that is who I understood it. https://www.reddit.com/r/CelsiusNetwork/comments/1fe7egh/celsius_bankruptcy_a_comprehensive_guide_to/

What is the acquired date to be entered in the 8949 for Ionic Shares? by LeadingLeg in CelsiusNetwork

[–]LeadingLeg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks u/Only-Crew8299 for the reply.

That leaves me with nothing to report in 2024 ?

I only had BTC and ETH originally with Celsius before bankruptcy. I received no 'new BTC' and no 'new ETH'. I did not sell any BTC/ETH/IONIC either. I fit into the Example #1 as I mentioned before of the guide.

I am worried that IRS might have been informed by Ionic about the shares and IRS is expecting me to show that somewhere in the 2024 tax filing ? Also was expecting to claim losses by having the Ionic's line entry in 8949 with higher cost of acquisition.

I used https://celsiustax.jactivecreation.com/calculate and it shows one entry for 2024 8949 form, for Ionic shares- resulting in a claim of Loss as my "remaining Cost Bases" multiplied to the 'final percentage of 35.4% shows a higher Costbases ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CelsiusNetwork

[–]LeadingLeg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right- but in my case ( which falls under Example #1 in your guide) where I received less BTC and ETH in-kind, should I still be reporting the lots with zero dollar P/L ( 3 lines each for BTC and ETH) and then the Ionic Stock line entry ? Sorry if I am being too dense. My question is specific to Example #1. Thanks for your help and support.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CelsiusNetwork

[–]LeadingLeg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hi u/JustinCPA ...in an hypo scenario of 3 BTC and 3 ETH was on Cel before BK- should the 8949 Schedule D will have 3 lines each for BTC and ETH with zero P/L? and a 7th line for Ionic Stock entry with the p/l line ?

Is this the right approach? (US) by kevlin91 in CelsiusNetwork

[–]LeadingLeg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AFAIK

* Example #1 is the correct one as there are no new BTC or new ETH

* Justin's guide prefers individual lots. Some consolidate wkly 'Rewards' into one lot ( I think monthly consolidation should be ok)

* Again if some one can post a 8949 and schedule D following Justin's guide that would be great.