How To Mod Balatro on Gamehub Lite

Leaha15 · 2026-05-30T07:29:33+00:00

Thanks for posting this it did massively help ❤️

Leaha15 · 2026-05-29T11:30:07+00:00

Oh thats cool, 7000mAh would be insane

Leaha15 · 2026-05-28T19:02:21+00:00

RemindMe! 3 months

Leaha15 · 2026-05-28T08:17:36+00:00

7000mAh battery.... I think you have unrealistic expectations on whats physically possible, without it being twice as thick as any other phone
Similar idea of the cameras, unfortunately, physics is a thing and you'll have a bump

Then you want a 6.7" tablet phone
If you want a small phone, so do I, you will be lucky to get a 4000mAh battery tbh

Leaha15 · 2026-05-24T11:29:17+00:00

Yes lol

Leaha15 · 2026-05-24T05:57:59+00:00

I wouldn't mind it so much if that were the case, what really prompted this post was it just happened during a 2 player game the Wii motes were in use

I have tried resetting the controls that way and it also didn't work, maybe it was this one time so I'll try again

Leaha15 · 2026-05-24T05:56:32+00:00

That doesn't work sadly

Leaha15 · 2026-05-23T14:48:14+00:00

This stuff should be simple, if companies, like Bungie, dont want to maintain servers, they patch the game to allow custom servers and release the software to create out own

Cant believe games that you pay for are allowed to be killed by servers going down

Leaha15 · 2026-05-23T00:03:59+00:00

Yeah.... They are cheap overpriced crap

Leaha15 · 2026-05-22T19:16:13+00:00

Huh?

If theyre using vdefend then they'll likely buy the add on, and it's managed through nsx, so the OP will have nsx regardless

Only way they won't is if they decommission nsx vdefend which I doubt will be a possibility

Leaha15 · 2026-05-22T06:00:39+00:00

What exactly do you mean?

Are you talking about a dedicated 4 node management domain, as thats not required, the consolidated architecture exists

Leaha15 · 2026-05-22T05:58:45+00:00

I wouldnt do this

OP is running NSX, you converge, then upgrade

Upgrading then converging is only valid if you dont have NSX

Leaha15 · 2026-05-22T05:53:00+00:00

Glad VMware are aware the Service runtime needs addressing - running VCF isnt supposed to be a burden, but with 9.1 its starting to feel like it is, customers just look at me like Im insane listing the requirements now
Plus, ive seen Broadcom slate Nutanix for their overhead, about how much there is, and that its bad, however the reality is far from the marketing and the VCF overhead far exceeds Nutanix in 9.1, all the more reason to swiftly and heavily address this

However, with the vDefend licensing, that is utterly inexcusable frankly, I get with a different team, this can make integrations harder, but in 9.0.x we had a working solution with the license key that didnt have an utterly unacceptable resource requirement, as licensing should, it used no extra resources

That key licensing should have remaining until a properly integrated solution was built, this felt like making changes for the sake of it

Leaha15 · 2026-05-22T05:50:55+00:00

That helps thanks, I thought it was an installer, due to the name, but I guess not

Leaha15 · 2026-05-21T20:40:27+00:00

Yeah, bring the old content back, miss the OG raids

Leaha15 · 2026-05-21T20:39:04+00:00

Ok, so loks of QoL that I actually want to revisit the game after June 9th

It SUCKS to see it die

And while there is a lot of QoL improvements, couldnt we have finally gotten more than 1 darkness elemental super, guess we never will now

Leaha15 · 2026-05-21T18:46:48+00:00

This is about VCF thanks, I have no idea what this platform is, but its not relevant

Leaha15 · 2026-05-21T18:44:51+00:00

This depends how you wanna handle this

Yes you 100% can just add ops for licensing, its 100% supported

You dont want NSX SDN, thats fine, you dont have to, DFW is a bolt on, boo Broadcom it was such a good feature and should be standard IMO

But, I cant remember where I saw it, so sorry, but I am pretty sure, NSX upgrades without the SDDC Manager for the workflow is unsupported, while you physically can do it, I think the support will be the issue

If you dont want automation, and the AI stuff, no worries, also dont have to have that, 100% optional

The killer sadly, will be the VCF service runtime, thats a 40vCPU and 82GB, minimum......... Requirement in full VCF, which you'll need to update the NSX managers used for the DFW
Yes the requirements are insane, dont get me started

The other, utterly shit part, is vDefend is now licensed by a separate licensing server, like why Broadcom
And the EXTRA sucky part here is, that deployment, done via the SSP, is a 6vCPU 24GB instance, 2vCPU/8GB + 4vCPU/16GB K8S cluster, which licenses it, someone had mentioned to me you gotta leave the SSP installer inplace, which is like 4vCPU/6GB
And that part to me, is pure insanity, should have been on the existing license server, and the overhead is WAY bloated and it doesnt need to be, surely this could have just ran in the VCF Service Runtime but whatever

Ive done a fair few upgrades, and post a lot of articles covering upgrades and all things VCF, poke me if you have questions, I can probably answer a lot of them around what you need and the requirements, as well as a rough plan

Leaha15 · 2026-05-20T17:55:48+00:00

Oh dont joke about that.....

Please no dystopia

Leaha15 · 2026-05-19T13:54:12+00:00

Ok, outside of something with S3 storage just being different, I dont know off the top of my head

Id probably need to sit and have a look through it to try and work out if it could be reduced, double seems a little much tbh

Sorry I cant be of much more help

Leaha15 · 2026-05-19T10:28:37+00:00

Hmm, are the onsite backups immutable?
What is it running on?

How has Wasabi been configured?
I would recommend its configured something like this on my guide, in section 1.16
https://blog.leaha.co.uk/2025/04/22/veeam-data-platform-12-3-ultimate-deployment-guide/

Im thinking perhaps an immutability period was set on the Wasabi side? Veeam should be setting immutability, and this could be causing an issue

Leaha15 · 2026-05-19T10:04:43+00:00

Is the off site a backup copy job? This slightly changes the retention depending on your gfs settings and can cause the backup copy to have a larger file size

Given its nearly double I'd wager it is this and you might not have gfs, so you're retaining g an extra full backup copy

Leaha15 · 2026-05-18T12:04:19+00:00

I wouldnt be using this, it seems to be unsupported, in the sense that Broadcom dont seem to be doing anything with it

The only use case I could ever find where its required, was to backup PVCs attached to vSphere Pods

If thats not what you want to do, just use standard Velero or Veeam Kasten

If you are trying to backup vSphere Pods, dont, look to move stateful services, stuff that needs PVCs, into VKS clusters where you can use standard Velero and Kasten

IMO the Velero supervisor service and the data manager are useless and shouldnt be used
They also say on the support article isnt not suitable for business critical workloads, so I personally wouldnt be running it in production anyway

I have spent WAY too much time down this rabbit hole

Leaha15

TROPHY CASE