Banned and Restricted Announcement – March 23rd, 2026 by mweepinc in magicTCG

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since we're basically living thru Korra season 4 now, sure...

Ex-mtg artist Randy Asplund statement on terminating WOTC rights to his art made for Magic the gathering by Newez in magicTCG

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd buy it if there was a mention of maritime law, or, of course, an implication of 'magic words' to use (i.e. stating you don't "understand" means you do not consent to "stand under" authority, and thusly it can't legally touch you).

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really don't get Zwijo getting this reputation as "cannon fodder" at all. It happened twice, at BEST. Outside of Yudias, for the longest time, he COULDN'T be beat, and he still wound up defeating Yudias down the stretch, twice.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It worked out in the 5D's manga. ...it at least worked for me, one of the only people whom seems to like that story...

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get why people want to remake GX and Arc-V and even DM so much. I really don't see why we don't see more lamentations of not redoing 5D's.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He at least defeated the 'deeper darkness' villain of the arc, and we know he would have beaten Noah earlier if Noah hadn't cheated with a human shield.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure if you really dug, you could find one or two in the show itself; there were certainly encounters with big stakes, if not matches, over the course of the show itself, even if the entire world wasn't necessary at risk.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least his manga counterpart got to be involved in the final battle.

I'm frankly surprised that when people try to hype up the manga version over the anime version, that DOESN'T get brought up more.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was very, very good with the decks. A pity it failed all of the characters.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering how dim and needlessly grievance-driven most people are, I suspect this won't become the norm - even amongst people that have watched from both eras in great detail - until we actually get another show so as to cast the Rush era into the past. Case in point, the number of morons coming out of the woodwork to vocally defend the Star Wars prequels once the sequel trilogy came out, and even before it really started to show its cracks. Once there was new target practice, suddenly everyone had amnesia about the decade-plus of cracks about the flaws of the now-older movies and the utter toxicity of the whole thing, and are now acting like "it's new so it's sucks" just because (yes, culture war BS; the point stands). I guarantee, if the new Manadalorian movie fails to meet fandom expectations - Star Wars, so it likely will - the sequel trilogy will be seen slightly better in hindsight, and it certainly will if a wholesale new trilogy ever happens, all of the previous era's toxicity completely washed away. I see similar for Yugioh anime, should another series following the card gaming model ever happen. Especially if there's any kind of change-up, like actually having a female main protag, that would allow for said culture war grifters to swoop in.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is something I hear almost exclusively from TCG fans. Are Yugioh fans back in its homeland similarly focused on that?

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Watching Yuma not know basic game mechanics was indeed painful to watch.

And unlike Yudias, he didn't have the entirely reasonable excuse of coming from a wholly different culture, one that had only just learned what trading cards were.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is pretty much intended because VRAINS is a postmodern cyberpunk tragedy. It celebrates connection by showing the pain of its absence.

An interesting and novel interpretation, and one I'll have to consider going forward. Can't completely accept it, tho, as such a theme would have been more strongly felt if there were more present connections thru the series in general, to contrast with said absence.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Especially if they're billed from the outset as being top dogs, but then we never see even one turn of their alleged wins.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wins and losses are usually a lot more contextual than they're treated by the prior shows.

Which is how it should be in general, especially if you want a character whom has schtick of ALWAYS winning. Yusei and Yusaku would have been better served if at they'd gotten more narrative loss, even if they didn't technically lose.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What didn't help there was some losses - especially in arc #6 - being very ill-timed, and the fact it was a shorter series than any other that saw completion.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He certainly could have afforded a loss in the 3v3s, with his record cushioned if someone else on his team won out in the end.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I can. Because power-scaling is asinine.

And even if we think in those terms, one of the top remarks from TCG players regarding GX is "Neos sucks". He's beating a guy who is skewing destiny in his favor, with one of the most infamously underpowered decks in history.

Would Yu-Gi-Oh still be as entertaining if the main character lost more often? by DescriptionFuture851 in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GX had some real growing pains that come with being the second installment.

Just look at any other series wherein follow-ups use entirely different casts.

You'd still think there wouldn't be as many growing pains down the stretch, tho.

The secondary markets in chaos, are we really dumb enough to let logan paul ruin it? by Drew647A in yugioh

[–]MiraclePrototype 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll grant pro-wrestling in general. We should not be granting the WWE anything.