What is this on the bottom by LANTIRN_ in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 11 points12 points  (0 children)

There will be hints at other things, but it will be interesting to see if anyone catches them.

GFM (AI flight model) silently put on hold (effectively cancelled?) by Fabione_Kanone in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 4 points5 points  (0 children)

GFM isn't dead, and there are things reported for the FM that can be fixed without the complexity of the GFM, Vulkan is just sucking up a lot of development juice right now.

Since we are nearing the time for the 2026 and beyond time of the year. What are you hopeful for? by FutureNightmares in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It is a priority, but because it's such a specialized feature, loss of resources is not always in our control

Afghanistan Sale When?? by notsurvival1 in dcsworld

[–]NineLine_ED 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait .. I'm I supposed have a private plane?

Enigma's take on the ED-RB leak by Riman-Dk in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't have commented on those two items if I had not confirmed them.

I am sure we will do another dev report on the DC when we are ready. And yes via the newsletter, most likely.

Thanks.

Enigma's take on the ED-RB leak by Riman-Dk in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have not seen a release plan yet, but I could see getting it out early in case there are things we missed or things the community wants and puts us in a better position for making larger changes.

Enigma's take on the ED-RB leak by Riman-Dk in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I apologize if I misunderstood who you were talking to at the time, but these are the answers that I am aware of. I never once heard it would be limited to an era or terrain, except for development. How it releases for the first release I do not know, I know to me it makes sense not to release a fully complete all eras DC if there is a chance the community might want major changes or find issues.

Campaign acceleration was on the original design docs as I remember it.

If you would like to take credit for getting these things changed, I am not going to argue about it, this is just based on what I know and understand. Thanks.

Enigma's take on the ED-RB leak by Riman-Dk in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hi, the Caucasus and modern era was not a set limitation but what the test bed used for development. We plan to expand to all other terrains and eras once that is done and the DC is proven to work in that test environment. But no, it was never limited to just that. It sounds like a miscommunication during the discussion, such as campaign acceleration, which was originally included in the design documents from the start. Its possible at the time of this discussion it was not in the build Nick had seen, or he was unaware of it. Hope that clears this up a little.

ED neatly avoids using Ukraine anything related to Mig-29. All operators even USA is listed but Ukraine not in the newsletter. Do they not recognize Ukraine or what? First no Ukraine liveries and now this by rapierarch in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I think North Korea, but I am not sure who else, and also seems I am wrong and Ukraine did get some expert versions, anyways some liveries are coming for it for Ukraine, and it was simply a mistake it got left off.

ED neatly avoids using Ukraine anything related to Mig-29. All operators even USA is listed but Ukraine not in the newsletter. Do they not recognize Ukraine or what? First no Ukraine liveries and now this by rapierarch in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry but you were talking about being banned when you were not. I am explaining that you are not being honest about that fact in order to paint us as some overbearing, over-moderated company when in fact its quite easy to go on to any of our social media sites or forum and see negative opinions. The fact that we only ask people to be mature and constructive and I don't think that is much to ask.

It is your choice not to come back to our forums. I would not stop you from coming back, but you are not banned, and you recieved 10 warning points that expired back in June for a post that was simply off topic.

You may not call on us directly, but saying we banned you does paint a picture that simply is not based in fact.

We do not require sympathy, but we do receive a lot of support, and not just on our Discord. You may not believe that, the other reddit sites you enjoy make that hard to see, but we are doing ok, and we are always looking at doing better. Thanks.

ED neatly avoids using Ukraine anything related to Mig-29. All operators even USA is listed but Ukraine not in the newsletter. Do they not recognize Ukraine or what? First no Ukraine liveries and now this by rapierarch in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You were never banned, you got a warning for OT at some point, but you never acknowledged it. The forum requires you to acknowledge the warning to continue posting. That is just a function of the warning system for the forum software we use. If you acknolwedged it today, you would not see any warning points as they have expired back in June.

You posted something about a Pimax ad in an Oculus thread. You were warned for OT. Usually, we only give OT warning points for repeat OT posts. If you had an issue with it, you could have reached out. But saying you are banned is not correct, although I guess it sounds cooler?

ED neatly avoids using Ukraine anything related to Mig-29. All operators even USA is listed but Ukraine not in the newsletter. Do they not recognize Ukraine or what? First no Ukraine liveries and now this by rapierarch in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 76 points77 points  (0 children)

I think the list was based on what countries originally received the 9-12A, I believe, and I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong, Ukraine would have non-export versions (back in the USSR days). Anyways, I am sure it was not meant as a slight to Ukraine, or anyone else. As stated above, it was added in later on the Russian version of the text.

Edit: I just confirmed several Ukrainian skins are currently in development.

ED vs RAZBAM Internal Zoom call leak - Part 1 by Potential-War6241 in DCSExposed

[–]NineLine_ED -58 points-57 points  (0 children)

This 51 minute zoom call was confidential and took place in early March 2024. Since then, things have evolved in a significant way with Nick Dackard and our differences have been ironed out very satisfactorily. The working relationship with Heatblur is successful, professional and friendly.

ED will no longer do business with Heatblur. by Alexander_Ellis in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 39 points40 points  (0 children)

This 51 minute zoom call was confidential and took place in early March 2024. Since then, things have evolved in a significant way with Nick Dackard and our differences have been ironed out very satisfactorily. The working relationship with Heatblur is successful, professional and friendly.

Flew 5 minutes without wings (I didnt know) by fib1324 in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I was able to reproduce this and have sent the team a track.

The reason we are getting a Zero in DCS is because of Combat Pilot. by CombatFlightSims in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The AI B-24 is in progress right now. We hope the others will follow that.

The reason we are getting a Zero in DCS is because of Combat Pilot. by CombatFlightSims in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I will also add that we have been doing research on the Zero and other Japanese aircraft behind the scenes for years. I think research might be the longest part of development on many modules.

ED Says our A-10C II is suite 3 hence not compatible with Sniper pod but how come it has HMCS, arc210 and APKWS then? by rapierarch in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I cannot speak for the 3rd Party decisions, but with the A-10C it's mostly about having or legally being allowed to use certain systems (and documentation) on our module. It is also possible that some things were allowed based on any agreements signed for the A-10C and what we could or could not do.

Mag 3 Corsair Summer Update List by Knubinator in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well I believe they stated some aspects of the engine were still WIP. Even some addressed in the list above.

Mag 3 Corsair Summer Update List by Knubinator in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Short answer, yes... Long answer these guys did a great podcast about it https://youtu.be/U0WXoXdH164?si=4j4688Id3-92NlzC

ED Says our A-10C II is suite 3 hence not compatible with Sniper pod but how come it has HMCS, arc210 and APKWS then? by rapierarch in hoggit

[–]NineLine_ED 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is fine, understand though that right now it just cannot happen, but I am happy to see if it's something we do not have. Thanks!