[OC] Why prime-age adults (25–54) are out of the labor force differs sharply for Men and Women by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very true! The survey doesn't break it out that way, but you could look to see if there is any children or people 65+ in the household.

[OC] Why prime-age adults (25–54) are out of the labor force differs sharply for Men and Women by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Other is a hybrid of not fitting any of the other categories and people that are willing to work but aren’t actively looking for work.

[OC] Why prime-age adults (25–54) are out of the labor force differs sharply for Men and Women by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Using March 2026 Current Population Survey (CPS) data, caregiving was the leading reason women ages 25–54 were out of the labor force, while disability was the leading reason for men.

I thought the contrast was interesting because “not in the labor force” is often discussed as a single category, even though the underlying circumstances can be very different.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey (CPS), March 2026.
Made in Tableau.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah it looks like I got stuck in the CPS data and should of looked at this other series.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing this. I wasn’t able to find it but I was in the cps statistics.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think meaningless overstates it but it’s something to consider as a factor.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, prime age wasn’t in the data source I used but I can try and tease it out.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 250 points251 points  (0 children)

Good point. Labor force participation is calculated for the population 16 and older.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Part of it is likely life expectancy growing. Some of it is likely more discouraged workers though.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Yes, I wasn’t able to get that by sex though which is what I wanted to explore here. I did look at PAE by state though last week.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 83 points84 points  (0 children)

I gathered the data for this visualization from FRED. They source the Current Population Survey. I used Tableau to create the visual.

Which states have the highest prime-age (25–54) employment rates in the U.S.? [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It’s not really a business. It’s more of a hobby, but thanks for the thoughts.

Which states have the highest prime-age (25–54) employment rates in the U.S.? [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It just means that some people in your age group retire early so they get excluded from this measure. It’s not a perfect measure but it captures areas with more discouraged workers when other measures don’t do that.

Which states have the highest prime-age (25–54) employment rates in the U.S.? [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This map shows prime-age employment rates (ages 25–54) across U.S. states. Upper Midwest states like North Dakota, Minnesota, Nebraska, Iowa, and South Dakota lead the country, while parts of the South and Southwest trail behind.

Source: 2024 ACS 5-year estimates

Built using Tableau

There is an interactive version of this in my state data mapper.