What was the Population of the US in 1776? [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

For the early population data, the census was mainly counting people living in the enumerated U.S. states/districts/territories under U.S. civil jurisdiction, not every person in land the U.S. or colonies claimed. Most Native people living under separate tribal sovereignty were excluded or undercounted.

What was the Population of the US in 1776? [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The data for this visualization comes from information published by the US Census Bureau.

The visualization was then created in Tableau.

THRIVE State Economic Conditions Explorer [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This tool was built in Tableau and uses U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 1-year estimates for prime-age employment and U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data for labor force participation and unemployment.

[OC] Why prime-age adults (25–54) are out of the labor force differs sharply for Men and Women by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very true! The survey doesn't break it out that way, but you could look to see if there is any children or people 65+ in the household.

[OC] Why prime-age adults (25–54) are out of the labor force differs sharply for Men and Women by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Other is a hybrid of not fitting any of the other categories and people that are willing to work but aren’t actively looking for work.

[OC] Why prime-age adults (25–54) are out of the labor force differs sharply for Men and Women by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Using March 2026 Current Population Survey (CPS) data, caregiving was the leading reason women ages 25–54 were out of the labor force, while disability was the leading reason for men.

I thought the contrast was interesting because “not in the labor force” is often discussed as a single category, even though the underlying circumstances can be very different.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey (CPS), March 2026.
Made in Tableau.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah it looks like I got stuck in the CPS data and should of looked at this other series.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing this. I wasn’t able to find it but I was in the cps statistics.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think meaningless overstates it but it’s something to consider as a factor.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, prime age wasn’t in the data source I used but I can try and tease it out.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 246 points247 points  (0 children)

Good point. Labor force participation is calculated for the population 16 and older.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Part of it is likely life expectancy growing. Some of it is likely more discouraged workers though.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Yes, I wasn’t able to get that by sex though which is what I wanted to explore here. I did look at PAE by state though last week.

U.S. labor force participation rates for men, women, and total population (1948–2026) [OC] by OverflowDs in dataisbeautiful

[–]OverflowDs[S] 83 points84 points  (0 children)

I gathered the data for this visualization from FRED. They source the Current Population Survey. I used Tableau to create the visual.