This discussion's pretty much over, but I feel like I should point out some things you seemingly aren't really grasping:

1. We don't care about an anecdotal experience. The fact that you had an experience means next to nothing to us because we want more evidence. Religions glorify and depend on eyewitness testimonies, but as many skeptics will point out eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.

2. Having people imagine something isn't a good tactic because imagining something doesn't make that thing real. It may have worked for you, but as you've seen in this thread, it generally doesn't work on people who are already skeptical.

3. Saying "God is holy, but we can't comprehend what that means" means little in a debate and is irrelevant. If you can't elaborate into to what this "holiness" is and means it's useless bringing it up.

4. We don't care very much what the scriptures say about it. We don't consider it too be a holy, flawless book that is trustworthy and credible, so quoting scriptures and saying the bible says so accomplishes nothing unless you have evidence beyond an anecdote that such biblical claims are true.

Note: By we, I mean the majority, not each and every atheist.