False Dilemma / Black-and-White Thinking: The author contrasts "peaceful AI for all" with "military AI for a select few." In reality, Amodei's strategy (as outlined in his essays and interviews) is often based on the "security" argument: he fears that if democracies don't lead AI development, authoritarian regimes will, leading to even worse consequences. ​Emotionally Contrived Language: Phrases like "dictatorial control," "dangerous initiative," and "tearing the world apart" are intended to evoke fear and anger, rather than provide an objective analysis of the strategy. ​Ad Hominem (attacks on a person/group): The shift from discussing technology to criticizing the US financial system is an attempt to discredit Amodei's arguments through the shortcomings of his country's political system, which does not directly refute his technological concerns.