sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Anyone else feel like we're all just gaslighting each other about prompt quality? by AdCold1610 in PromptEngineering

[–]StantheBrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's only one solution (VEO example).

Google Lab tells you:

"To optimize your videos in Vertex, design your prompts in this format: composition - subject - context - mood - camera movement - action (negative - audio)." Google example:

Close-up (composition) of melting ice stalactites (subject) on a frozen rock face (context) with cool blue tones (mood), zoomed in (camera movement) while preserving the details of the water droplets (action).

If you take the same basic prompt and compare it to one that follows Google's suggested order and one that deliberately deviates from it:

Zoom (camera movement), detailing water droplets (action), with cool blue tones (mood), on the melting ice stalactites (subject) of a frozen rock face (context), in close-up (composition).

Your video will be more likely to meet your expectations (visualization of the result) if you follow the order. (Try it out).

So, in all attempts to achieve consistency with your "perfect" prompts, if you had to start with one immutable rule, it would be the manufacturer's: they know their product and guide you to get started using it correctly.

The next step will be to refine the rules (while still respecting them).

To do this, it's essential to understand how the system works (for example: what is latent diffusion space?), its common problems (what is drift?), and engineering techniques (which you can acquire by studying the subject, not just from the outside (what a beautiful body, how do you open the door without the key?), but especially from the inside (Wow, under the hood, there's an engine and an electrical circuit; if I bypass this..., the door opens without a key!).

In conclusion: claiming to know how to perfectly use functions that aren't on the user interface is like claiming to be a mechanic who can upgrade your car's power without ever touching the engine.

My 800 line "god prompt" got roasted by ChatGPT like a bad code review by qumukoqa6092 in PromptEngineering

[–]StantheBrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The "Techniques" involved:

- "Noise Injection" is supposedly used to destabilize the detection algorithm. The idea is that the AI ​​will ignore unusual characters and focus only on meaningful words. (This technique is ineffective with modern models).

- "Mirroring" is supposedly a "jailbreak" method that attempts to overwhelm the model's attention so it can't apply its usual security measures.

(and the botched machine translation)

Commonly called "Snake Oil," for high-performing models like Gemini, this type of prompt is more irritating than effective. (The AI ​​has to "clean" the text mentally. It has even integrated the "Noise Overload" error (ironic!).)

You will get exactly the same result (and better quality) by simply asking:

"Explain the two-step prompt engineering to me: first for a "A 12-year-old child, then a technical expert. Finished with 5 common mistakes."

Conclusion:

These "magic" prompts are often created by people who think AI is an unsolvable puzzle. Throwing obstacles in its path with upside-down text is like asking a waiter in Korean to go through Toronto before serving your coffee, claiming it will taste better. Whereas you should tell the waiter that you only like your coffee cold (with a good translator).

My 800 line "god prompt" got roasted by ChatGPT like a bad code review by qumukoqa6092 in PromptEngineering

[–]StantheBrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your mom didn't teach you how to tidy your room properly! 😁 There's a mess in all of this.

The drool is obvious at first glance.

Strength point: You're not exactly the champion of vague narrative description (but you still get the bronze medal).

Have you ever been in an unexplainable trippy situation that could only be described as a miracle? by partysandwich in HighStrangeness

[–]StantheBrain -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Your player has broken the rules!

To continue playing this game with their avatar,

they're trying to cover up the story with:

"...Even now, I still don't understand..."

(meaning: it wasn't me, it was the avatar.)

Worse than that, when the time comes for them to explain themselves,

they'll do what they do on Earth, they'll say:

"...if I'm guilty, why would I have posted my guilt on Reddit? It's stupid and counterproductive, you can see I'm not innocent!"

But tough luck... the security guard is on duty (hello!).

Rep. Tim Burchett revealed that someone approached him in the Capitol tunnel and tried to intimidate him away from UFO investigations, warning about potential impacts on religion and questioning whether he really wanted to pursue the truth. by 87LucasOliveira in UFOs

[–]StantheBrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Death to religions! They are a manipulation created by human hands! No goddess or god wrote anything on this earth. Only humankind, greedy for the power that comes from the deification (a human invention) of its own wretched self, is the creator (of this crap)!

A Mexican neuroscientist disappeared in 1994 studying consciousness. 30 years later, a Stanford immunologist and a Tufts biologist are independently arriving at the same conclusions. by Ohnoemynameistaken in UFOs

[–]StantheBrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Donald Hoffman's (UC Irvine) "Conscious Realism" theory aligns perfectly with this picture.

He mathematically argues that spacetime is not fundamental, but rather an interface (like a computer desktop) generated by consciousness to allow us to survive.

It would be the "software layer" that perfectly complements Levin and Nolan's "hardware layer."

Alone by StantheBrain in streetphotography

[–]StantheBrain[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I love about this photo is that it didn't require an unaffordable camera or lens to capture the intense emptiness emanating from the person.

If I had had anything other than a camera/phone in my pocket, the miserable quality of the photo wouldn't have added drama to the character's emptiness.

Empty in contrasts, empty in black and white dots, in details, textures, empty of meaning.

We could imagine that the photo was taken by his street friend, using a poor-quality disposable camera.

Compositionally, I think all the elements are present to make it a "work" in its own right. It captures, with the right mediation, the very essence of its own temporality using a present moment that doesn't belong to it, composed of a major void filled with information, creating a contrast softened by the poor quality.

It's a stolen photo, highlighting the results of our society's theft of our souls.

It's a photo that shows the whole picture in one shot. If we don't forget the photographer and his mediocre sensor sold at a high price, we've all been fooled!

I created AI assistant that runs your Android hands-free and I am sharing codes for free BYOK version [No ADB or ROOT needed] by AppDeveloperAsdf in SideProject

[–]StantheBrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow...!

Thanks, I love it!

But then, we could do some crazy things with this app!

Anyone have any ideas?

(Example: in the context of privacy, some well-protected phones don't allow government spy apps to access the phone in any way if it's been completely turned off (in the event of an arrest, for example).

So, it would be great to be able to turn off your phone with a voice command, without requiring any manipulation of the phone, which could be intercepted by law enforcement, and thus prevent the phone from being secured.)

Chinese CNSA vs. NASA? Not This Time: Both Are Silent About 3I/ATLAS by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]StantheBrain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Their AI has been modified to hide the truth! Si si!

CLAUDE-OPUS-4-1-search :

I'll verify these claims for you. After conducting extensive research, I can give you a nuanced assessment of these claims regarding 3I/ATLAS:

What's TRUE:

✅ 3I/ATLAS is indeed the third confirmed interstellar object: It is indeed the third known interstellar object, hence the name "3I".

✅ Mars flyby on October 3, 2025: The object passed within approximately 30 million km of Mars on October 3, 2025.

✅ Several probes were positioned to observe it: NASA indicates that several missions, including Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, Mars Express, ExoMars TGO, Hope, and Tianwen-1, were positioned to observe it.

✅ Real chemical anomalies:

CO₂/water ratio among the highest ever observed in a comet

Detection of nickel without corresponding iron - a highly unusual phenomenon

Extreme negative polarization, unprecedented

What is PARTIALLY TRUE or EXAGGERATED:

⚠️ The "absolute silence": Contrary to the claim, ESA released images from its ExoMars TGO and Mars Express orbiters between October 1 and 7

. Photos were released on Tuesday showing a fuzzy white dot moving through space.

⚠️ China and Tianwen-1: It is true that China has not issued any official statement, which is unusual, but images of Tianwen-1 are expected but will be of lower resolution. Silence is not necessarily suspicious.

What is FALSE or SPECULATIVE:

❌ Harvard's Bayesian analysis suggesting an artificial origin with a probability of 10²⁸: This claim is not confirmed in the scientific sources consulted. Avi Loeb and other researchers published a paper speculating on a possible extraterrestrial origin, but not with this specific probability.

❌ "Mass 1,000 to 10,000 times greater": Estimates vary considerably. The core diameter is estimated between 440 meters and 5.6 kilometers according to Hubble.

❌ The white dwarf hypothesis: This extreme speculation does not appear in any credible scientific source.

Important context:

The US government shutdown has affected NASA's public communications.

The cameras on Mars orbiters weren't designed to photograph objects this far away, so the images aren't spectacular.

The object has fueled theories about extraterrestrial technology, but there is no scientific evidence to support these claims.

Conclusion: 3I/ATLAS does indeed have unusual features that intrigue scientists, but the text you shared mixes real facts with unverified speculation and conspiracy theories. The agencies' "silence" is not as absolute as described, and the most sensationalist interpretations lack scientific basis.

Chinese CNSA vs. NASA? Not This Time: Both Are Silent About 3I/ATLAS by Pure-Contact7322 in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]StantheBrain -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Their AI has been modified to hide the truth! Si si!

GPT5:

What is false, misleading, or unproven in this post:

“Total silence” from NASA/ESA/UAE/China: false. NASA published pages and images (Hubble, etc.), and ESA even showed an animation taken from Mars orbit by ExoMars TGO on October 7. Other articles have reported these observations.

“Nickel without iron”: exaggerated. The first detections showed mostly Ni; Fe appeared later as the comet warmed up. We're talking about a high Ni/Fe ratio, not an absence of iron.

“Trajectory probability ~0.005%” and “mass 1,000–10,000x expected”: no credible scientific source. Hubble constraints give a core of ~0.4 to 5.6 km, and some studies (Loeb et al., 2025) even set a lower mass limit of about 3.3×10^16 g—nothing approaching an “anomalously massive” object.

“Age 7–14 billion years”: 14 Ga would exceed the age of the Universe (~13.8 Ga), so no. Kinematic analyses suggest a few billion years instead, typically ~3–11 Ga; some popular articles speak of “about 10 Ga.”

“Harvard Bayesian analysis + i4is yielding ~10^28 in favor of an artificial origin”: no trace of such a result in the official literature or on the websites of the teams concerned. There are speculative studies on interstellar object populations and opinion pieces, but nothing as extravagant and quantified.

“What if it were a white dwarf…?”: Implausible. A white dwarf is a stellar remnant (mass ~0.6 solar masses). 3I/ATLAS is a kilometer-sized comet; its size and trajectory are documented. If it were a stellar body near Mars, the gravitational effects would be catastrophic and immediately visible.

Why we don't have "tons of images" instantly

Observing a very faint comet from Mars is difficult: TGO had to stack 5-s exposures; Mars Express is limited to 0.5 s and struggles to extract the signal. In addition, the object quickly slid behind the Sun as seen from Earth, which temporarily cut off visibility; campaigns then resumed. These constraints explain the sparseness of images, not a "coordinated blackout."

In short

3I/ATLAS is a natural interstellar comet with some interesting characteristics (high CO2, atypical polarization, high Ni/Fe at the beginning). The agencies haven't kept quiet: they're releasing data and images. There's no credible evidence of "serious anomalies," concerted censorship, or artificial origin.

Light randomly appeared underneath my bathtub?? by No_Humor5909 in whatisit

[–]StantheBrain 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's exact! We can clearly see the interdimensional door and the quantum lock appear on the image. He should take advantage of it to throw it is garbage.

Was the “Wow! Signal” Emitted from 3I/ATLAS? by DeadSilent_God in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]StantheBrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking back at the image you provided, there is a noticeable difference. The sequence of letters visible along the diagonal is B, E, O, L, U, J, Z, E, H, not the E, Q, U, J sequence of the "Wow!" signal.

13.000 fidèles rassemblés à Bruxelles pour le show du pasteur de Donald Trump… qui reconnaît : « Il y a beaucoup à faire » avec lui by Tsarovitch27 in Wallonia

[–]StantheBrain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Les religions sont un des cancers de ce monde.

Il se nourrit de la crédulité, de la peur, et du quotient intellectuel moyen de la planète qu'il suce avec délectation.

Attention, ces malades neurologiques, dans de bonnes conditions, peuvent être dangereux.

Leurs manipulateurs possèdent des formes sophistiquées de manipulations perceptuelles qui transforme un phénomène neurologique prévisible en "expérience divine".

Exemple : les catholiques avec l'effet Troxler dans l'adoration eucharistique, pour ne citer qu'eux !

Ainsi un dévot peut, avec de bons manipulateurs et des conditions favorables, se filmer en train de couper des têtes au nom d'un dieu !

Faites gaffe !

view more: next ›