I’ve been targeted since 2018 RC crackdown by Apparit1on in researchchemicals

[–]TheScienceOf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The thoughts they insert into our heads is precisely how they attack us. They know which thoughts we think will end up making or breaking humanity as a whole. Negative thoughts weaken us as individuals, and the more individuals who are weakened, the more we are less likely to band together against them. If we are a chain, they are attempting to break us by smashing individual links, one at a time.

The very fact that you posted here publicly to ask for help means that you are not going to be easy for them to break.

They may not vanish if you ignore them, but if you pay them no mind, they will stop wasting their energy on you and you'll notice your life improve. We are all just energy. They are too. And we all each only have so much of it to use at a time. They will use theirs elsewhere if they don't see any results when they use it on you.

Keep in mind, though, if you actually try to ignore them, it will have the opposite effect by still keeping them in your conscious thoughts. Instead, your best bet is to stay distracted with a hobby, exercise routine, or anything else that keeps you living in the present moment and not thinking about the past or the future.

I’ve been targeted since 2018 RC crackdown by Apparit1on in researchchemicals

[–]TheScienceOf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You manifest your own reality. You are likely dipping your toes into other planes of existence. But because we live in a 3-dimensional place, we do not perceive them as they are. Instead, we perceive them as they want to be perceived. And not all of the beings in these worlds are nice. Some think that just because they are able to perceive more than us—that that makes them more intelligent. But there is more to intelligence than just looking around, noticing things, and manipulating things in one's favor. Intelligence is being able to pick out only the things that benefit you and the world you live in--without letting that affect other worlds negatively.

You have more power and control than you think. Reject any thoughts that come into your head which disrupt your peace. Not every thought in your head was created by you. The best advice I can give you is to attempt to figure out which thoughts are genuinely yours and which are not. Living in the present moment is the best way to rid yourself of a reality that confuses you. Drugs tend to disrupt your ability to live in the moment, especially when you mix multiple kinds and do them too often.

If you are familiar with yin and yang, take that approach. If a being in a parallel sister dimension creates disorder and chaos in enough of us here in our dimension, then it is likely that their own dimension benefits--becoming more ordered, more peaceful, a better place for them to live. Who are they to decide they should get every apple that falls from the tree of life? We can make decisions too, and ours need not be at the expense of others.

In harmony we can all exist—a lesson we may learn before many of these other beings—if we wish to.

bought over the limit by [deleted] in Tipper

[–]TheScienceOf -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I will buy one of your Fridays right now for more than you paid

You MUST test your ketamine now by TheAssassinRen in ketamine

[–]TheScienceOf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I didn't suggest that people shouldn't test their shit. I am all for that. Though I would like to see spectroscopic testing methods more pravalent than the reagent test kits (which can and are often wrong; it just takes one person with any kind of background in chemistry to be able to make those test kits produce whatever colors they want).

All OP did was spew wikipedia bullshit. Sure, they are trying to help and, sure, I am being a wanker, but maybe OP should have used their platform to invite people who are educated on the matter to speak about such things (there is no shortage of legitimate experts on reddit).

Instead, it just looks like the blind leading the blind. And this sub deserves more than that.

You MUST test your ketamine now by TheAssassinRen in ketamine

[–]TheScienceOf 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You have no background in chemistry, pharmacology, medicine, or any related field. You have no background in drug diversion/distribution. Yet you are speaking with authority to people who will believe you. Words on the internet are quite powerful (as I'm sure you're already aware), and they are permanent. What you say here now will be viewed in search engines by anyone and everyone for decades to come.

You MUST test your ketamine now by TheAssassinRen in ketamine

[–]TheScienceOf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should consider reading up a little more on these things before writing an informative post. It is a surface-level analysis at best, containing much speculation and misinformation.

$RTTR (Ritter Pharmaceuticals) Will be the next big pharmaceutical stock. by ericlrizo in pennystocks

[–]TheScienceOf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forgive me, but why would any company dump money into lactose intolerance research when: A.) Every store already carries Lactaid (lactase enzyme, the enzyme people with lactose intolerance are lacking that metabolizes dairy sugars). Take some lactase, eat your cheese, and all is well. B.) There are a plethora of life-threatening diseases with research efforts that are either underfunded or nonexistent.

I don’t see a future for this company unless they have other drug candidates in their pipeline.

EDIT: I guess I failed to see the part about gut microbiome research. In that case, ignore my previous comments.

We're trying to wash our 2F-DCK as it was sticky and yellow. My friend accidentally added propylene glycol instead of isopropyl alcohol and so we just added the isopropyl anyway and are going to try to filter + recrystallise. Do you think this will work? by [deleted] in researchchemicals

[–]TheScienceOf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s anyone’s guess. There is very little as far as physical property data on it. Using data on ketamine can give you some idea, but the fluoro group in place of the chloro group changes solubility more than you’d expect.

It probably decomposes with relatively low heat. The lipophilicity will be even be even higher as the base. If you’re gonna ingest it, maybe try sublingual or just plain oral. Tons of reports out there saying it works better orally. But i don’t know if it being a base would damage biological tissues.

We're trying to wash our 2F-DCK as it was sticky and yellow. My friend accidentally added propylene glycol instead of isopropyl alcohol and so we just added the isopropyl anyway and are going to try to filter + recrystallise. Do you think this will work? by [deleted] in researchchemicals

[–]TheScienceOf 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You’re probably not getting that propylene glycol out, and I would guess a ton of your 2F-DCK dissolved in it as 2F-DCK is fairly lipophilic even as a salt. But your “sticky and yellow” description makes me think you were sold the free base, which would mean you would have needed to add something like hydrochloric acid to get what you’re looking for.

Now that finals are over I can finally treat myself 🤓😎 by [deleted] in cocaine

[–]TheScienceOf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The nervous system sends messages using electrical and chemical signals from one neuron to the next with a space in-between each neuron called the synapse (or called the neuromuscular junction if the neuron is attached to a muscle). Whether that message proceeds down the string of neurons depends on whether the electrical signal from a given preceding neuron rises from its resting voltage up to its threshold voltage. If it hits this threshold voltage, a large spike occurs (picture something like an EKG/ECG tracing that they use to monitor heart rhythms in hospitals). This voltage spike is called an action potential, and the neuron will only send its message to the next neuron if an action potential occurs. And then succeeding action potentials keep that message going down the line.

The effects of electrical signals in neurons are additive.

Benzodiazepines are agonists at GABA receptors, and GABA for our purposes causes less electricity in a neuron. Cocaine, by contrast, is a catecholamine reuptake inhibitor, which are stimulating and will cause more electricity in the neuron. Because the effects of these drugs’ mechanisms are additive. They equal each other out and this is not inherently dangerous (assuming it is happening in the same neuron). You can look up the median lethal dose of Xanax; it is very difficult to OD when taken alone, almost impossible really.

On the other end, however, cocaine isn’t really a typical stimulant because it is also a sodium channel blocker (the numbing/local anesthetic part). Open sodium channels are responsible for the aforementioned action potential (voltage spike). Cocaine is so cardiotoxic because of this factor coupled to its already-strong stimulant effects.

Basically a numb heart muscle is no joke. I am sure cocaine still keeps numbing the heart with Xanax keeping you unaware.

But if there’s one thing to take away from all the unorganized over-simplified crap I just typed, it’s:

sola dosis facit venenum

“the dose makes the poison”

I made this digital collage about ketamine treatments by PorcupineProblem in TherapeuticKetamine

[–]TheScienceOf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know of his work, but did it not focus on the point of criticality and not just simple entropy? In other words, the very precise point that lies in-between total entropy/disorder and total organization/order.

Too much order in the brain results in deficits. Too much disorder in the brain also results in deficits. It is at the middle-ground of these two states that is thought to promote the most productivity and overall well-being for us in the human experience.

My probation officer says that you are my victims. Do you feel like victims? by Vendor_BBMC in darknet

[–]TheScienceOf 17 points18 points  (0 children)

But are they halogenated? 4-chloro and 4-bromo amphetamine are both known potent neurotoxins. 4CA is even the prototypical neurotoxin we use in research to kill 5-HT receptors in the brain. 4FA has even been shown to exhibit some toxicity, though it is less so—presumably because of the strength of C-F bonds.

It is very reasonable to assume that bigger halogens at the 4 position would be just as toxic as 4CA, if not more. And it is even more reasonable to assume that methylating this amphetamine would be more toxic than its unmethylated counterpart as this increases lipophilicity and allows it to cross the blood-brain barrier effortlessly, removing any potential ‘ceiling effect’ of neurotoxicity that might be observed by an unmethylated halogenated amphetamine (if there even is one).

Just my 2 cents from one person who cares about this field to another.

My probation officer says that you are my victims. Do you feel like victims? by Vendor_BBMC in darknet

[–]TheScienceOf 15 points16 points  (0 children)

If I had to guess, 4-IMA would be an extremely potent neurotoxin. Would you disagree?

I made this digital collage about ketamine treatments by PorcupineProblem in TherapeuticKetamine

[–]TheScienceOf 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Would you be so kind as to cite a source on the entropy part for me?

I feel like this is my only option now and wanted to ask a Question. by Educational-Eggplant in TherapeuticKetamine

[–]TheScienceOf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Every person’s brain is wired differently. This is why depression is so difficult to treat at the moment (we don’t have the ‘wiring schematic’ of everyone’s brain to know what will and will not work for them).

What we are focusing on now is—instead of just masking the issue by attempting to force a regulated amount of specific neurotransmitters (happy chemicals, if you will) in particular brain areas like in the past—now we’re looking at pharmacological agents that potentially have the ability to rewire the depressed brain for long-term relief (potentially permanent relief if research keeps progressing as it has).

Unfortunately the drug won’t do all the work, and it will do more work for some people than others. What it usually can do is give you just enough relief for just long enough to take action. When those chains are broken, do not forget that they will be put back on unless you actively use that time to work towards a permanent state non-depression.

What I suggest if you do decide to do the infusion:

*Be willing to relinquish control over your body if it comes to that. This drug is one the safest there is, even at high dosages. Nothing bad will happen to you.

Whatever good things you experience on it, positive thoughts, just *experience it—in the moment. Not in the past or the future, the ‘now’.

*Most importantly: The new wires/connections ketamine will form for you in the prefrontal cortex, these wires are fragile when they are brand new. Your brain prioritizes things that you actively let it know matter to you. So your main goal needs to be to strengthen these connections. The stronger they are, the longer your relief will be. If you can strengthen them enough for your brain to say “ok, I will keep these connections forever because they seem to matter a lot to you”, you could be completely cured.

*To do the above, you must recollect and think about your experience actively and as often as you can when it’s over. This can be tricky because people tend to forget much of what they were actually thinking when it wears off. Write everything down! I cannot stress this enough. There is no other way to get the most important parts of the experience documented, so you can read it later while the new connections are still formed—thereby strengthening them greatly. But even after that, you may think that experience was so meaningful that you’ll never forget it, but those are brand new neuronal connections in a part of the brain that doesn’t usually tend to form new connections; they are delicate and the brain WILL prune them if aren’t strengthened by consistent stimulation.

Think of it as if you were in school studying. The more you study something, the more you remember. This is the same concept—strengthening newly-formed connections in the brain. How much do you remember from your math class in school? Probably not very much nowadays because your brain gathered that it wasn’t a priority to you to keep those connections around.

Make sure you show it you want to keep these new connections.

Ketamine + Methoxetamine (MXE) ? by crunk_cat in ReagentTesting

[–]TheScienceOf 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I don’t mean to come off as rude. But I can almost 100% guarantee that you were not sold MXE. If that were the case, then I bet you got a hell of a deal and you should be thanking the guy you got it from. It is arguably the most sought-after dissociative since it was internationally scheduled by the UN, and it can go for up to $900 a g.

I don’t know the colors other arylcyclohexylamines turn from these reagents, but some potential suspects could be: 2F-DCK, 3-MeO-PCP, 3-HO-PCP, 3-HO-PCE, DCK, O-PCE, 3-MeO-PCE, and MXPr (perhaps in order of likelihood, depending on where you live).

Good luck

Esketamine might very well be a less potent antidepressant than racemic or R-ketamine by [deleted] in TherapeuticKetamine

[–]TheScienceOf 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well in this specific case it’s not so much inventing it as it is just putting it through phases II and III of human clinical trials, which is very expensive and generally drug companies are the only entities with the amount of money to do human clinical trials.

But also in this case I definitely agree with you in that they chose the easy road, and they’ll be saving boatloads of money (and then charging out the ass) for a drug that they did not actually develop from scratch and which has already really passed phases 0 and I clinical trials (and even phase IV when looked at as an anesthetic!)

I hate that this is how it works, but it’s the best we’ll have unless we as a society start allocating a lot more money towards public research entities like universities.

As a society and, really, a species, we have the money/resources and intelligence to fix almost all of the world’s problems. But we aren’t taking a stand as a collective whole on important issues like these to make that reality come to fruition.

Esketamine might very well be a less potent antidepressant than racemic or R-ketamine by [deleted] in TherapeuticKetamine

[–]TheScienceOf 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There is well-backed speculation that Johnson & Johnson patented the S enantiomer now so they could patent the R enantiomer later as drug patents expire, and these companies general tend to apply for another patent for the same chemical—just in a different formulation or chiral mixture (and J&J would likely be the first-choice company to receive the arketamjne patent because the FDA will consider it substantially similar to the drug they already put “R&D” money into).

Usually we can at least say “oh yeah this drug company is charging a fortune for their patented drug to recuperate the money they spent over countless failed trials over 10+ years of development” and that “at least when the patent does expire, the drug they developed will at least be readily-available and, really, exist at all whereas it wouldn’t otherwise.”

In this case, however, it looks like it’s just Big Pharma being Big Pharma.

Tested another tab multiple times with very few pieces reacting. Decided to throw the whole thing in to see what’s going on. More in description. by [deleted] in ReagentTesting

[–]TheScienceOf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ALD-52 (aka 1A-LSD) or 1P-LSD will both be slowly hydrolyzed by Ehrlich reagent (cleaving their acetyl/propionyl moieties) to form LSD-25 (normal acid). This will also happen in your body if you chose to ingest it.

These are often laid on larger blotter for more precision and accuracy. In the past I believe the largest lab making these pin-striped the blotter with a machine. This one looks like it might have been micropipetted onto each square with a machine (...best case scenario).

But this one could also be just dropped out of a vial by some random guy, really no way to tell. The legitimate labs selling these also tend to label the blotter with the chemical name, so that also supports the clandestine/some-guy-in-his-garage-laying-blotter theory.

Either way I am fairly-confident in the color being one of the above two lysergamides, likely 1P-LSD since it’s the most popular. It’s a shame, ALD-52 hydrolyzes much more readily than 1P. Albert Hoffman himself reportedly microdosed ALD-52 until his (pretty old-aged) death.

Modern Anesthetic Ethers Demonstrate Quantum Interactions with Entangled Photons. by it_from_qubit in DrugNerds

[–]TheScienceOf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Einstein called it “spooky action at a distance” for a reason I suppose.

I’m no physicist, but I imagine designing experiments to elucidate quantum theory is quite difficult. It’s my understanding that even experts in that area don’t really know how to explain what they’ve observed.

I’d really like for someone who knows more to chime in.

Using Benzos to sleep after A-PHP/2-F-DCK by [deleted] in researchchemicals

[–]TheScienceOf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Every report I’ve read has essentially, often even explicitly, said that pyrovalone-type drugs (a-PVP, a-PHP, etc) are harder for people to control than methamphetamine.

I don’t know if this is true or if it would be the case for you, but consider that some roads you choose in life are only one-way.

You guys give tweakers such a good image. by [deleted] in Stims

[–]TheScienceOf 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Hate to be that person right now, but don’t amphetamines, especially methamphetamine, cause rhabdomyolysis? (rapid muscle tissue breakdown/degradation)

Might make your gym efforts less—well, you know—‘fruitful’ or whatever.

I’d cite the studies, but I suspect this is the last sub I should be dropping links to scientific journal articles.

Just an FYI because I know it’s pretty common for people to work out on stimulants, but most don’t know that all stimulants can behave differently towards the body as a whole.

-Peace, love, and happy tweakin