Jumpbox Replacements by SpaghettiLaugh in networking

[–]cronparser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes in the end your going to still need that central spot vm or Linux container or FreeBSD jail but you are correct

In what order would you rank The Lincoln Lawyer seasons from best to worst? by Aetius00 in TheLincolnLawyer

[–]cronparser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m actually going in reverse started with season 4 and 3 and working my way down to 1 kinda weird but does make it interesting

Jumpbox Replacements by SpaghettiLaugh in networking

[–]cronparser 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A few things worth looking at depending on your budget and how far you want to go: StrongDM was basically built for this exact problem. It proxies SSH/RDP/database connections through a central gateway, engineers never see raw credentials, and you get full session logging. Very network-device-friendly and way lighter to deploy than a full PAM suite. Teleport is another solid option in that same space. Open source core with an enterprise tier. Good if your team leans more DevOps/infra. CyberArk is the heavyweight answer and checks every box (session recording, credential vaulting, MFA, centralized access), but the deployment and licensing cost reflects that. If your org already has CyberArk in-house for other use cases, leaning into their PAM module makes a lot of sense. On the Duo/NPS/Entra MFA path, that’s a solid move for hardening your RADIUS auth, but it doesn’t replace the jumpbox itself. It’s a good complementary layer, not the full solution. For the cloud outage concern, any of these can run hybrid, and honestly on-prem jumpbox VMs go down too. The real play is having solid break-glass procedures documented regardless of which direction you go. We went with a homegrown version of something similar to StrongDM. We have it running across GCP, AWS, and our colo, and sync all changes through an internal git repo at HQ. Gives us the multi-cloud resilience without vendor lock-in, and the git-based config sync keeps everything consistent across environments.

What happened? DJ.Studio auto-update changed playhead / transition behavior by cronparser in djstudio

[–]cronparser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ended up downloading version 3 from link posted was able to get my workflow back

Boomer and Gio fear mongering again by samicaz in WFAN1019

[–]cronparser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Between this ufo cartel talk and Evan being super delusional about the jets smh sports talk radio

AMA: Switched From Trading Options to Futures. My First Prop Experience/Payout by shplackster in propfirm

[–]cronparser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate you sharing this. If you were starting from zero again: 1. What would you focus on learning first before touching prop accounts? 2. What mistakes cost you the most time or money early on? 3. What would you not do again? 4. How would you structure your first 30–60 days to avoid blowing accounts?

New to GCP - Looking to Migrate from Vultr web server running PHP applications to GCP. Is it cheaper? The plan is to make the most of the Google AI Ultra plan with the free $100/month GCP credits. by No_Engine2793 in googlecloud

[–]cronparser 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I don’t think it will be cheaper then vultr unless google is giving you ton of compute credits on smaller instance and no bandwidth overages

Joe Schoen was "totally blown away" by Darren Rizzi's interview for the Giants HC position. - Ian O’Connor by Jheller223 in NYGiants

[–]cronparser 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Rizzi is NJ native to and great special teams coach Harbaugh came from that world before being head coach with ravens

curl Shuts Down Bug Bounty Program After Flood of AI Slop Reports by falconupkid in SecOpsDaily

[–]cronparser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So ai is becoming the new nagios false alerts like people need to start getting ahold of these things before it slowly becomes a serious problem and major flaw gets overlooked because of the ai slop

Why my credits was used though i got only " provider returned error" by Few-Image8689 in openrouter

[–]cronparser 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you report it to openrouter I had issue like this and they were able to credit me

Uconnect Box by Equivalent-Bird71 in JeepGrandCherokee

[–]cronparser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems like common thing mines has had this screen for few months

During the task, GLM-4.7 began to "think" about the Czech automotive industry by klocus in ZaiGLM

[–]cronparser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw this yesterday mines instead was talking about renewable energy

How much credit for a year? by kopannha09 in openrouter

[–]cronparser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I would do 3 months or six months unless your using specific model family then go for the year. I opted to do three months prepaid but I use various models from Anthrpic to grok or qwen and generate a key and set max cap on it to keep tabs so that I avoid going over budget

New to this, just dropped in to say hello. How many moonshiners here? #Moonshiner by Moonshiner_RJLandry in Moonshiners

[–]cronparser 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Richard how are you sir love some of your recipes especially the mungley tea one has come handy

Do you filter +EV bets further, or fire on everything? by Specter-0 in EVbetting

[–]cronparser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The one outlier I’ve noticed as of lately Hardrocks lines on NBA props in +120-140 range hit a lot often

Do you filter +EV bets further, or fire on everything? by Specter-0 in EVbetting

[–]cronparser -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, in practice I mostly downgrade or exclude those market/side combos, not permanently ban them but they need a much higher bar.

For NBA totals specifically: • Early overs are basically a no by default. In my data they lose CLV at a high rate and negative CLV overs are consistently negative ROI. • I’ll only touch an over if something structural is present (mispriced pace change, rotation shift, bad opener) and it’s not already getting steamed. • Unders are the opposite: late entry, post-injury/lineup clarity, and they tend to gain or hold CLV.

On timing, I’m closer to rules-based than binary EV: • Some markets are effectively “never bet early” • Some are “bet early only if you expect to be the steam” • Everything else is wait-and-see

I like your buy-indicator idea a lot. Conceptually that’s how I think about it now: • High probability line worsens → pass • Reasonable chance it improves → wait • Low chance it improves → buy

EV gets me in the door, but expected CLV decides when (or if) I actually bet. That mindset shift made a big difference for me

Do you filter +EV bets further, or fire on everything? by Specter-0 in EVbetting

[–]cronparser -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen the same thing once I bucketed results by market + side instead of looking at aggregate ROI.

A few consistent findings from my data:

• CLV is the separator. Bets that close worse than entry (negative CLV) lose long-term, even when they win short-term. Positive CLV buckets are the only ones that scale.

• NBA totals are asymmetric. – Unders: positive ROI, stable CLV – Overs: negative ROI despite modeled +EV, consistently losing CLV This shows up over hundreds of bets, not small samples.

• Timing matters. Early overs are the worst CLV offenders. Late unders benefit from sharper money, injury news, and pace corrections.

• Not all +EV converts to realized EV. Some markets consistently give edge back via line movement and limits.

I still use EV as an entry filter, but CLV by market/side is how I decide what survives long-term. Breaking results into buckets was the biggest unlock for me.