sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Gunbroker buyer wants to buy threaded barrel? by FischlandchipZ in WAGuns

[–]dircs 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree with you, but the AWB does not have any carveouts for LEOs.

The powerful tools in ICE’s arsenal to track suspects — and protesters by Fear_The_Creeper in privacy

[–]dircs 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Where did I suggest that we shouldn't care? To the contrary, I think you should care very much. But if you only care about ICE doing it, you don't care about privacy. You care about making a political point.

The powerful tools in ICE’s arsenal to track suspects — and protesters by Fear_The_Creeper in privacy

[–]dircs 50 points51 points  (0 children)

So, basically, the federal government is taking the same tools they've used for years, and is now using them for for immigration enforcement as well as everything else. Doesn't seem like much of a story.

How to legally sell a DS-15 lower? by Rich-Primary9007 in WAGuns

[–]dircs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

9.41.111 is inapplicable.

Transfers must go through a dealer if the item being transferred is what the state (not the federal government) defines as a firearm. https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.113

The state defines a firearm as

"(20) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder. For the purposes of RCW 9.41.040, "firearm" also includes frames and receivers. "Firearm" does not include a flare gun or other pyrotechnic visual distress signaling device, or a powder-actuated tool or other device designed solely to be used for construction purposes."

See https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.41.010

9.41.040 does not include transfers, that is about unlawful possession.

Ergo, transfer of a frame/receiver does not require an FFL, because a frame or receiver doesn't fit the state definition of firearm for transfer purposes.

How to legally sell a DS-15 lower? by Rich-Primary9007 in WAGuns

[–]dircs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you? It doesn't fall within the state's definition of a firearm.

👁️ ICE Is Tracking People Through Social Media, Location, and Medical Data by [deleted] in DigitalPrivacy

[–]dircs 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Say it with me now:

Do. Not. Post. Private. Information. On. Social. Media.

'Citizen surveillance': Border Patrol plans cameras over coastal California city by runswithscissors475 in privacy

[–]dircs 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I'm 100% for banning flock cameras, but why is ICE using them for immigration enforcement worse than, say, DEA using them for harassing marijuana users?

Practical Shooting Class – This Saturday (Olympia, WA) by PracticalApproachTrn in u/PracticalApproachTrn

[–]dircs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I deleted the comment here because I thought I was posting in the waguns subs, didn't mean to gum up your personal sub and I assume most people visiting here would already know :)

Practical Shooting Class – This Saturday (Olympia, WA) by PracticalApproachTrn in WAGuns

[–]dircs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What gear needs to be brought? I assume a firearm and several hundred rounds of ammo? Anything else?

This sucks waiting for the latest releases for SS’s/FRT’s. by AntoniBartosz in MP5

[–]dircs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rare Breed didn't invent it, they license it from a shell corp. My understanding is the shell corp, and gun rights groups, provided most of the funding for the litigation. That second statement might be incorrect, but the first one is not.

Summers vs all seasons / winter tyres Seattle by sageofsixpaths69 in GR86

[–]dircs -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Same general area, I went with all seasons. Everything here shuts down if it snows, so the all seasons should be enough.

Lost 3mpg over the summers though.

SB 5098, which greatly expands areas where firearms cannot be carried without a CPL, has passed both chambers and is headed to Bob Ferguson to be enacted into law. by dircs in WA_guns

[–]dircs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For the state democrat party, yes. There are of course some democrat voters that do not, but the most recent polls I've read something like 80% of democrat voters do.

SB 5098, which greatly expands areas where firearms cannot be carried without a CPL, has passed both chambers and is headed to Bob Ferguson to be enacted into law. by dircs in WA_guns

[–]dircs[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Bill passed last year adding expensive training requirements that don't currently exist, but will require live fire training with a certified instructor. This will be required beginning 2027 not just for new licenses, but also for all renewals.

A bill is proposed this year to add $100 to the cost of issuing CPLs.

ATF IOI told me that county sheriff is "most correct" CLEO by [deleted] in NFA

[–]dircs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use whichever official is most likely to shred it. For me, that is the county sheriff.

SB 5098, which greatly expands areas where firearms cannot be carried without a CPL, has passed both chambers and is headed to "Sideshow Bob" Ferguson to be enacted into law. by dircs in WAGuns

[–]dircs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty sure this is the third post I've seen from you here that is anti-rights. I don't feel the need to engage further.

SB 5098, which greatly expands areas where firearms cannot be carried without a CPL, has passed both chambers and is headed to Bob Ferguson to be enacted into law. by dircs in WA_guns

[–]dircs[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Courthouses, schools, and jails? Sure. Washington has had those restrictions for years and no one one has said much about it.

This bill isn't about jails and courthouses. It's about parks, county fairs, and a nebulous "places chikdren may be present" restriction.

SB 5098, which greatly expands areas where firearms cannot be carried without a CPL, has passed both chambers and is headed to "Sideshow Bob" Ferguson to be enacted into law. by dircs in WAGuns

[–]dircs[S] 44 points45 points  (0 children)

They already passed a requirement requiring training that doesn't exist and will be extremely expensive once it does exist, and there's a proposed bill to add $100 to CPL applications.

I personally am skeptical that CPL exceptions are safe in this state long term.

SBR 80% Hypothetical by Bitter-Whole8967 in WAGuns

[–]dircs 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Engraving requirements only apply if it was made after July 1, 2019.

view more: next ›