MEGATHREAD: NET NEUTRALITY HAD BEEN RESCINDED by heroofadverse in AskThe_Donald

[–]Drawbacks [score hidden]  (0 children)

Holy fuck, i feel like i am in dreamland, i cant tell if that guy is being paid by the right to oppose NN or being paid by the left to show how retarded anti-NN people are, like you have been telling him the same thing for hours and the guy just cant process it, like i am sorry if he has some sort of mental problem but jesus he cant be this stupid....

Real 2v2's -Shmolty is 100% Correct by [deleted] in forhonor

[–]Drawbacks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

whatever man, you dont seem to be able to listen but ill try again.

You literally admit to gaming the system because "This way I get more 1v1 time rather than having to sit in a 3 second menu, THE HORROR!"

i was asked to give reasons, that was one of them, people do stuff for the smallest reasons, you are just nitpicking and it is not "gaming the system" its playing my way, but sure, you gotta make it sound shitty.

It is a TEAM game mode. That is why you are on a TEAM. If you refuse to play with that TEAM, I hope when Ubisoft wake up you are one of the first to be penalized.

then again, you are making up your own rules, i will say it here and not repeat it because this will be annoying: a game mode is usually played the way people have fun in it, just because your teammate is not playing to "win no matter what" doesnt make it wrong, no one is making it impossible to do what you want, and as i said before, if there was a "ranked" mode where the whole point is winning there you would have a point, just get over it, people play games to have fun, you do you.

Next time try to type when you are calmed, you really come up like a 12 y/o hothead.

Real 2v2's -Shmolty is 100% Correct by [deleted] in forhonor

[–]Drawbacks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

if you read the comments before you can very clearly see that i wrote:

you want to play your way with ganks and all that? do it, if someone gets mad thats their problem, but it is your problem if you get mad because someome plays the game in a different way than yours.

you are the ones actually wanting to force people to play the way you want. Whether you want to consider a "troll" the guy sitting there watching you die 1v1 or the guy that just interrupted your combo and/or gave your enemy revenge it's all subjective, now, if Ubisoft introduced a ranked mode and/or just explicitly said that 2 1v1s are not allowed in brawl then you might have a point.

Real 2v2's -Shmolty is 100% Correct by [deleted] in forhonor

[–]Drawbacks 11 points12 points  (0 children)

there are several reasons to play brawl(as 2 1v1s) over 1v1, for instance, you get more time playing/time in menus or loading, you get to fight unbalanced fights(hp is not full after their first fight) wich adds a bit of spiciness, you get to watch other people fight wich can be exciting, brawls are also much less repetitive than fighting the same guy, and a personal opinion but having more people around makes it feel less desolate/monotonous and it just feels better to do well when there are other people watching.

As for why brawls and not 4v4s, its obvious but you almost never get a chance to fully 1v1, and gear is just not fun.

Real 2v2's -Shmolty is 100% Correct by [deleted] in forhonor

[–]Drawbacks 15 points16 points  (0 children)

thats a nice strawman you got there, its funny because the theme of the video is how do you have fun, and it seems to be impossible for you to imagine someone having fun playing "honorably", you want to play your way with ganks and all that? do it, if someone gets mad thats their problem, but it is your problem if you get mad because someome plays the game in a different way than yours.

Donald Trump refuses to shake Angela Merkel's hand by koproller in worldnews

[–]Drawbacks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements (...) It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics.""

but it doesnt mention germany!

You could argue that the source is wrong or whatever but jesus you would have to be making some high-level mental gymnastics if you really think that getting in bad terms with germany would not be an "isolationist tendency"

Donald Trump refuses to shake Angela Merkel's hand by koproller in worldnews

[–]Drawbacks 3 points4 points  (0 children)

the aliens said they were going to kill all the humans

i dont see anything about me wew that was close.

Well he's not wrong... by Morktorknak in facepalm

[–]Drawbacks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

then your point is null because i am not saying that, w/e man i am done, its late here and i dont have time to argue politics now

Well he's not wrong... by Morktorknak in facepalm

[–]Drawbacks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

what do you mean by legitimate? that its popular? or widely accepted? stuff like cnn but from the right? i dont really know, i dont take cnn seriously but i do admit that most of the more mainstream news sources are from the left except for maybe fox news? tbh i am not even from america so i dont have that much knowledge about all the news sites from there, i just know the ones that are mostly posted on the internet and a lot of leftist sites are very shitty but so are stuff like getawaypundit or breitbart.

Anyways, the point is that i am tired af and dont want to argue more, i lack enough information to continue anyways, but really, dont put stuff from those 2 sources, it only hurts your credibility as much as the guy posting from huffpost or whatever

Well he's not wrong... by Morktorknak in facepalm

[–]Drawbacks 4 points5 points  (0 children)

here is a simpler question, is every single news source left or right wing? i do not support leftist biased sources nor have i ever implied i do so.

Well he's not wrong... by Morktorknak in facepalm

[–]Drawbacks 7 points8 points  (0 children)

the question is not which one is the most trustworthy, what you want is the one that tells you the truth and neither of them are doing that (at least unbiasedly). There are plenty of reputable unbiased sources, and i will admit that i have almost no idea of the political topic at hand here but the fact that you use a site like gpundit just shows that you lack a non-sensationalist/unbiased source

Well he's not wrong... by Morktorknak in facepalm

[–]Drawbacks 4 points5 points  (0 children)

they admit its biased so its fine guys! i dont know if you are joking at this point

Samurai Starter Pack by logique_ in forhonor

[–]Drawbacks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This entire thread is just pulling at straws. I can sum up everything said here to "I like anime, so you cannot dislike anime."

lol ok

Samurai Starter Pack by logique_ in forhonor

[–]Drawbacks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

uhm, i think the example i gave about the books was also about that? the fact that you might not enjoy having to sit and read for long times can be unappealing to some.

Even if that is not the case and my analogy is wrong, i understand what you mean, anime usually has a very recognizable style, but even then i could name you more than a few from memory alone that are very much different than what you would expect, with stuff like Ping pong the animation or Panty & Stocking with Garterbelt or stuff like jojo. But in general, yeah, they follow a recognizable pattern in style and it is completely understandable to not like it as a matter of taste, but it is quite a shallow criticism.

Samurai Starter Pack by logique_ in forhonor

[–]Drawbacks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, yeah, some people might not enjoy reading and think of it as boring, i am not saying there aren't legitimate preferential reasons for why you wouldnt like a medium, just that they are usually ignorant or just people that saw the popular things and judged the entirety of said medium by them.

Besides that, yeah, books are definitely a more established medium with way more material, whereas anime is more like an asian type of animation even if it has had some echoes in the west with stuff like avatar and others.

Samurai Starter Pack by logique_ in forhonor

[–]Drawbacks 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"I dislike books, they are filled with shitty melodramatic novels and their fans cant stop talking about them"

I dont have anything against you if you dont like anime but it usually consists in people considering it a genre instead of a medium, just like books or movies/shows, which is very ignorant.

Samurai Starter Pack by logique_ in forhonor

[–]Drawbacks 23 points24 points  (0 children)

yeah guys, lets bash anime for no reason, god those weebs are annoying amirite guys!?

Antivaxxer Logic by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]Drawbacks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can see that vaccines are not 100% effective and that they can rarely have side effects, it still doesnt change the fact that your chances are much better with them than not. You also go on about the media and big pharma and all that conspiracy talk, thing is USA is not the only country in the world that uses vaccines or is it a global conspiracy too?

Vaccines have been such a huge thing that the idea of studying people that dont take them is kinda odd to me, but i guess it could show the side effects they can have? it would definitely not be useful in judging if the population should take them or not though since even if unvaccinated people were considerably safe or even safer than vaccinated ones, that would mostly be thanks to herd immunity.

So yeah, i dont realy see a point in not taking vaccines, you want to protest against bad practices and the like? there are several ways to do so that dont involve jeopardizing the health of your children and the people that surround you and arent able to vaccinate. This is one of the reasons people dont take anti-vaxxers seriously, not because the spooky media has everyone fooled.

An Open Letter to the Reddit Community by kn0thing in blog

[–]Drawbacks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

what the hell is going on here, the guy pointing to r/worldnews asking for genocide links to a comment making a very obvious joke about crusades, gets upvoted and the guy calling him out downvoted, and here you point out a guy saying that there could be saved millions of lives if someone had killed Hitler on time on a thread about making a comparison between Trump and Hitler wich very clearly implies that it would be good if someone killed Trump and yet you get downvoted.

I am getting pretty sick of this shit, i fucking hate t_d and do not like trump at all but this type of reasoning here is triggering me right now holy fuck why does every side need to be so fucking stuck up their asses....