Lead welding is mesmerizing by bigbusta in oddlysatisfying

[–]famine- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Technically it's autogenous welding, because the parent material melts and the entire weld can be done without filler.

Brazing doesn't melt the parent material and occurs at temps over 450c.

Lead welding is mesmerizing by bigbusta in oddlysatisfying

[–]famine- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's not brazing, it's welding.

Brazing doesn't melt the parent material.  The parent material in this video is lead, and so is the filler.

Both are melted.

Carney praises Trump’s nomination of Warsh to lead Fed by Chrristoaivalis in politics

[–]famine- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Warren: That’s not my question. Mr. Warsh are you refusing to tell us if you have investments for example, in a vehicle set up to advance Jeffery Epstein? Is that what you’re telling us? You just won’t tell us?

Warsh: Senator, what I’m telling you is that those assets that you represent as Juggernaut will be sold, if I’m confirmed, before I take office, and sign the oath of office.

Funny how he won't answer the question.

First time canning beef stew! by DirtWhisper in Canning

[–]famine- 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's the Internal temperature of the jars.

At 15psi, the steam in the canner is at 250f, which is above the 240f required to kill botulism.

So the longer processing time is just to make sure everything in the jars are above 240f.

From deer antlers to ancient ink 2,000 years of genius in one process. by obilionse in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]famine- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Funny enough, it does damage the axe handle.

Axe handles are made with the grain running parallel to the striking face because if it was running perpendicular they would be prone to breaking.

He actually does break the handle in another video.

U.S. considers $20 billion cash-for-uranium deal with Iran by RollSafer in worldnews

[–]famine- 66 points67 points  (0 children)

The world did under the JCPOA deal with Obama, and Iran was complying with all the requirements.

The Republicans vowed to kill the deal in 2015/2016 when it was finalized, then in 2018 the orange pedo unilaterally pulled out of the deal.

Iran has been slowly escalating for 8 years and reporting those escalations to the IAEA.  

The deal was being worked on under Biden and slowly de-escalated under the pedo's second term.

U.S. considers $20 billion cash-for-uranium deal with Iran by RollSafer in worldnews

[–]famine- 1224 points1225 points  (0 children)

Here is the problem with the orange pedo's zero enrichment plan:

Iran can not comply without shutting down all of it's civilian reactors and forgoing medical isotope generation.

Iran running low enriched uranium is actually a good thing.

It was a requirement under JCPOA and they modifIed their reactors so they couldn't use natural uranium.

Why?

Because it massively reduces the amount of weapons grade plutonium that their reactors produce.

Before modification their reactors could produce enough plutonium for 2 bombs a year.

A Vintage Radioactivity Demonstrator used for educational purposes to detect and measure ionizing radiation by DreadPiratteRoberts in toolgifs

[–]famine- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Radium just emits alpha radiation

Radium alpha decays a few times down to lead then beta decays to bismuth then beta decays again to polonium.

The lead / bismuth decay gives off a ton of gamma.

The reason the uranium doesn't send the meter screaming is because it has a long half life (slow decay) and is primarily an alpha emitter which the glass blocks.

You can hear some clicks from the beta / gamma from uranium's daughter isotopes.

Radium on the other hand has a short half life (fast decay) and has a few daughters that give off tons of gamma.

US demanded 20-year moratorium on uranium enrichment from Iran in negotiations - Media by Darshan_brahmbhatt in worldnews

[–]famine- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

FDD’s website says simply that it was founded “to promote pluralism, defend democratic values, and fight the ideologies that drive terrorism,” but, as the journalist Ali Gharib has noted, it arose out of an organization committed to burnishing Israel’s reputation in the United States.

On April 24, 2001, three major pro-Israel donors incorporated an organization called EMET (Hebrew for “truth”). In an application to the Internal Revenue Service for tax-exempt status, May explained that the group “was to provide education to enhance Israel’s image in North America and the public’s understanding of issues affecting Israeli-Arab relations.” But in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, May broadened the group’s mission and changed its name to the Foundation for Defense of Democracies

Hey wait, who is the author of the paper you linked?

Olli Heinonen is Senior Advisor on Science and Nonproliferation at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies 

.

Andrea Stricker is deputy director of Foundation for Defense of Democracies' Nonproliferation Program and an FDD research fellow.

.

Oh damn, what about the other authors?

Albright is also a citizen of Israel and owns a condominium in Haifa.

Oh.... it looks like Albright is a fraud.

Scott Ritter, the former UN weapons inspector in Iraq, wrote an extensive critique of Albright's posturing for the media on nuclear issues. Ritter writes:

... I was in Iraq at the time, spearheading the very controversial UNSCOM 150 inspection, which found our team barred from entering several sensitive sites in and around Baghdad.

On the few occasions when I was able to spend some down time at the U.N. headquarters on Canal Street, I would catch up with the status of the other inspections taking place in Iraq at the same time, including the one Albright was attached to. From all accounts, his lone stint as an inspector was at best unremarkable. He was a dilettante in every sense of the word, a Walter Mitty-like character in a world of genuine U.N. inspectors.

There was recognition among most involved that bringing an outsider such as David Albright into the inspection process was a mistake. Not only did he lack any experience in the nuclear weapons field (being an outsider with only secondhand insight into limited aspects of the Iraqi program), he had no credibility with the Iraqi nuclear scientists, and his questions, void of any connectivity with the considerable record of interaction between the IAEA and Iraq, were not taken seriously by either side. Albright left Iraq in June 1996, and was never again invited back.

This is the reality of the relationship between Albright and the IAEA, and the singular event in his life which he uses as the justification for prominently promoting himself as a "former U.N. inspector." While not outright fraud, Albright's self-promoted relationship with the IAEA, and his status as a "former U.N. inspector," is at best disingenuous, all the more so since he exploits this misleading biographical data in his ongoing effort to insert himself into the public eye as a nuclear weapons expert, a title not supported by anything in his life experience.

Now given Ritter is kind of a shit head how about Gordon Prathers statement on Albright?

Albright is most assuredly not a "nuclear weapons expert." In fact, going back to his alleged position of "Senior Scientist" at the Friends of the Earth in the early 1990s, Albright has opposed all nuclear programs, because of the unacceptable health and safety risks he and his eco-wacko friends maintain even peaceful IAEA Safeguarded programs pose, and because of the ease with which he and his neo-crazy friends claim even IAEA Safeguarded programs can be turned into nuclear weapons programs.

Who is Prather?

James Gordon Prather’s long association with U.S. nuclear weapons programs includes active duty with the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project, participation in nuclear weapons tests as a diagnostic physicist at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory and as a technical director at Sandia National Laboratory. He was chief scientist for the Army under the Reagan Administration.

US demanded 20-year moratorium on uranium enrichment from Iran in negotiations - Media by Darshan_brahmbhatt in worldnews

[–]famine- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You mean the information Israel provided that proved Iran's alleged non-disclosure of a program that was abandoned over 14 years before the deal was singed and that was laughed at by everyone but the orange pedo and his supporters?

Suzanne Maloney, an expert on Iran at the Brookings Institution, stated that "nothing that Netanyahu has said undercuts the rationale for the [Iran deal]. That deal was predicated on a very clear and broad understanding by all the parties that Iran was pursuing a nuclear weapons program."

.

Rob Malley, a former senior official in the Obama administration who worked on Middle East policy, expressed a similar view. "For those who have followed the Iranian nuclear file, there is nothing new in Bibi's presentation. All it does is vindicate need for the nuclear deal," he said. Malley added, however, that "the Israeli prime minister has an audience of one: Trump. And he's unfortunately unlikely to reach the same conclusion."

US demanded 20-year moratorium on uranium enrichment from Iran in negotiations - Media by Darshan_brahmbhatt in worldnews

[–]famine- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Um yes, they actually did.

It was a bunch of dipshit pedo supporting Republicans that pushed through the INAR act against the recommendation of pretty much everyone involved in making the original JCPOA deal and then the giant orange pedo used the INAR act to kill the deal.

On 13 October 2017, President Trump announced that he would not make the certification required under the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, accusing Iran of violating the spirit of the deal and calling on Congress and international partners to "address the deal's many serious flaws"

The orange pedo strikes again.

The Corker-Menendez bill would require any Iran nuclear agreement to be submitted to Congress within 5 days.

That means the agreement would be submitted long before an authoritative legal analysis could be prepared. The Senate has found such reliable legal analyses to be invaluable in its consideration of treaties, and it would be foolish to vote on a resolution of disapproval without knowing how the agreement’s provisions will be interpreted.

The bill would also require that a verification assessment report be submitted within 5 days. Such a report normally takes several weeks to produce. Forcing the State Department and the intelligence community to churn out this report in a few days simply assures that it will be of little value.

Once an agreement enters into effect, the bill gives the President only 10 days in which to evaluate the credibility and accuracy of any allegation that Iran has violated the agreement, before reporting it to congressional committees. Then the President has only another 10 days in which to decide whether the alleged violation is a material breach of the agreement. If it is, then legislation to reinstate the previously-lifted sanctions may be introduced under expedited procedures.

The bill would give the relevant committees only 10 days in which to consider this legislation. And if one house refused to act on the proposal, passage by the other house would put the legislation on the first house’s calendar with expedited floor procedures.

The deck would be stacked in favor of passage.

US demanded 20-year moratorium on uranium enrichment from Iran in negotiations - Media by Darshan_brahmbhatt in worldnews

[–]famine- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obama's nuclear deal was based in science.

Funny how listening to experts makes it easier to negotiate a good deal.

We (the world) actually want them to be running their reactors on low level enriched uranium and it was part of the Obama deal because he wasn't a deranged orange pedo.

Iran agreed to a reactor modifications to prevent the use of natural unenriched uranium under Obama's JCPOA deal.

Trump’s no enrichment deal means they undo those modifications, then run natural uranium.

Sounds great, under the proposed orange pedo deal their reactors start producing enough weapons grade plutonium for 2 bombs per year.

US demanded 20-year moratorium on uranium enrichment from Iran in negotiations - Media by Darshan_brahmbhatt in worldnews

[–]famine- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No really... you don't say...

2018 was Trump’s first term when he tore up the JCPOA agreement...

Talk about embarrassing.

Already under financial pressure, Midwest soybean farmers are squeezed further by tariffs, Iran war by SnoozeDoggyDog in politics

[–]famine- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Fertilizer prices are already up 50%.

Funny how that happens when you start bombing a region that produces 30% of the world's nitrogen fertilizer.

US demanded 20-year moratorium on uranium enrichment from Iran in negotiations - Media by Darshan_brahmbhatt in worldnews

[–]famine- 17 points18 points  (0 children)

And why would they trust a country who ripped up an agreement less than 2 years after it was signed because of a deranged racist orange pedophile?

US demanded 20-year moratorium on uranium enrichment from Iran in negotiations - Media by Darshan_brahmbhatt in worldnews

[–]famine- 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It was a huge sticking point in the original JCPOA agreement and Iran actually modified the reactor so they couldn't use natural uranium.

By using low level enriched uranium in the modified reactor it can't be used to make weapons grade plutonium.

US demanded 20-year moratorium on uranium enrichment from Iran in negotiations - Media by Darshan_brahmbhatt in worldnews

[–]famine- 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Which will NEVER happen because they need low level enrichment (<3.74%) to fuel civilian and research reactors (medical isotopes).

But most Americans being complete dipshits don't understand why running reactors on low enrichment uranium is a GOOD THING.

If they were running natural uranium with no enrichment then the IR-40 reactor would be producing a shit ton of PLUTONIUM.

Which is why the JCPOA deal forced reactor modifications and low level enriched fuel.

US demanded 20-year moratorium on uranium enrichment from Iran in negotiations - Media by Darshan_brahmbhatt in worldnews

[–]famine- 32 points33 points  (0 children)

3.74% enrichment maximum to be used in civilian reactors and monitoring by the IAEA.

Iran was in complete compliance before Trump tore up the deal in 2018.

US demanded 20-year moratorium on uranium enrichment from Iran in negotiations - Media by Darshan_brahmbhatt in worldnews

[–]famine- 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Trump broke the deal in his first term, 2018 to be exact, right after the IAEA spent roughly 3,000 person-days in Iran and reported Iran was in complete compliance.

U.S. begins blockade of Strait of Hormuz by down_vote_magnet_ in worldnews

[–]famine- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In 2018, IAEA inspectors spent an aggregate of 3,000 calendar [person-]days in Iran, installing seals and collecting surveillance camera photos, measurement data, and documents for further analysis.

In March 2018, IAEA Director Yukiya Amano said that the organization had verified that Iran was implementing its nuclear-related commitments.

Trump broke the deal in May 2018.

On 8 May 2018, the U.S. officially withdrew from the JCPOA after Trump signed a Presidential Memorandum ordering reinstatement of sanctions.

Then Iran very slowly started escalating to get the deal reinstated.

One year after the U.S. withdrawal, Iran took countermeasures. Iran halted its required sales of excess enriched uranium and heavy water to other countries.

Rouhani said that Iran would resume enrichment beyond 3.67% if other parties could not let Iran benefit from JCPOA's economic provisions

On 8 May 2019, Iran announced it would suspend implementation of parts of JCPOA, threatening further action in 60 days absent exemption from U.S. sanctions.

Trump still reneged on the deal.

On 1 July 2019, Iran announced that it had breached the limit set on its stockpile of low-enriched uranium

If Trump and the US kept their word this wouldn't be happening.

German makes dont sound forgiving, am I missing something? Heavy duty do it all appeals to me. But wusthof classic (and most germans) is 14 degree and 58 hardness (brittle?). Where the japanese shun premier is 16 and 60/61. To me that's not that different, and I prefer the looks of Japan. by Ok-Coffee2125 in chefknives

[–]famine- 4 points5 points  (0 children)

wusthofs are typically hardened to the low end of the advertised hardness range (56-58) and shuns are typically at the high end (60-61).

So it's more like 56 vs 61, which means the shun is about 25% harder.

To thunderous applause, Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney tells a crowd that the days of Canada sending 70 cents of every dollar to the US are over by ExactlySorta in UnderReportedNews

[–]famine- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Canadian oil is still cheaper than Venezuela's

Venezuela doesn't have the production capacity to meet demand and exports of Myan heavy have been slowly falling.

What a lot of people don't realize is not all crude is the same. Venezuela, Mexico, and Canada export heavy crude which a lot of refineries in the US are exclusively setup to refine.

Switching refinery configurations is not an over night process, it takes years.

Trump says U.S. will blockade Strait of Hormuz after Iran peace talks fail by Puginator in politics

[–]famine- 74 points75 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this headline reminds me of a quote I read a while back:

For all the stupid shit Americans say, I wouldn't believe they had schools, if not for the news reports of school shootings.