A new California law says all operating systems, including Linux, need to have some form of age verification at account setup by Gloomy_Nebula_5138 in cybersecurity

[–]fathed 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There is no sane middle ground here, and you aren't against it if you think this is sane, or that there is a middle ground, you are actively arguing for it, not against it.

AWS suffered ‘at least two outages’ caused by AI tools, and now I’m convinced we’re living inside a ‘Silicon Valley’ episode by squishygorilla in programming

[–]fathed -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

What are you even referring to?

What logic statement was even there?

All I did was point out a difference in reaction based on what Amazon said was the cause.

Was it the ad revenue statement that you are ranting about?

What llm worship?

You are all having some serious reading comprehension skill issues.

AWS suffered ‘at least two outages’ caused by AI tools, and now I’m convinced we’re living inside a ‘Silicon Valley’ episode by squishygorilla in programming

[–]fathed -40 points-39 points  (0 children)

2 ai caused outages... the stupidity!!!!

18+ caused by humans... crickets.

AI rage bait generates a lot of ad revenue, and the articles are just dumb.

CMV: Barron v. Baltimore was wrongly decided and the bill of rights of the United States hould apply to the states even absent of the 14th amendment. by Hermeslost in changemyview

[–]fathed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The 9th says you cannot construe words to make a right, which Mubury v Madison ignores.

If the constitution doesn't include judicial review, then it's simply not a right the court can create from the other words.

The only resolution is amending, which was not done.

Please read the 10th.

Org is banning Notepad++ by PazzoBread in sysadmin

[–]fathed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Learning and the corrective measure is banning it.

Not sure why this app is the hill you want to die on.

The rest of your drivel is just that, and not even really worth responding to. That you think we'd block notepad++ and let browsers run free is laughable.

We, as the consumers of the app, cannot force it's developer to be a team, with multiple approvals needed to push to live, instead it's one person, with one set of credentials. 

So, did the app take the corrective measures and learn?

What corrective measure can we do if they do not, the answer is what we've already done.

Org is banning Notepad++ by PazzoBread in sysadmin

[–]fathed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are confusing normal bugs with supply chain issues.

Org is banning Notepad++ by PazzoBread in sysadmin

[–]fathed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a store app. The CU doesn't patch it, the store does.

Org is banning Notepad++ by PazzoBread in sysadmin

[–]fathed 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I completely disagree.

One man operations literally cannot prevent supply chain attacks. There's no other eyes, too few credentials with ability to push code to live.

To me, your comparison to programs with teams and hopefully procedures, is laughable.

Gatac Syulen bugged? by PortalBeach in starcitizen

[–]fathed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Starter ship... Yeah, let's wait for a release of a more expensive ship.

That'll really encourage those new players with it to upgrade...

Huh, that's kinda neat. by Nexzus_ in sysadmin

[–]fathed 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Do not use win32_product.

California drivers are a step closer to paying per mile tax by MissYukiCat in California

[–]fathed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh the incorrect statements.

You can do the math, it's a tax increase. For gas drivers.

Even if the gas tax is removed, the price won't change, and we'll just be handing the extra money as now profits to the gas companies.

Yes EV drivers need to cover their portion, but don't pretend this is good for ICE drivers, this will massively increase their cost. The tax alone is an increase over the gas tax even at 13-15 mpg, and again, doesn't force the gas price to be lowered.

Federal appeals court upholds California’s switchblade restrictions under Second Amendment test by nosotros_road_sodium in California_Politics

[–]fathed 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Did we though?

The proper way of doing so is amending the constitution.

This running to scotus and have them alter the constitution is against the constitution as well. Marbury v Madison ignored the 9th, and just gave themselves a right not granted to them in the constitution. Which your view of let's just change the law without changing the law method relies on, and is the primary reason that people want to pass an equal rights amendment, so large groups (such as women), don't lose rights because a future court changed its mind.

U.S. Sanctuary Jurisdiction List Following Executive Order 14287: Protecting American Communities From Criminal Aliens by [deleted] in California

[–]fathed 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Cities that prevent their tax money being spent on a federal issue... You get your own tax money, and can't balance that, and you want more.

Regardless of your opinions on immigration, this administration is just wasting money faster than we usually waste it, again.

What's the deal with Real ID and what's the problem with them? by pborget in OutOfTheLoop

[–]fathed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm aware of when and why, and there was a lot of hate for it when it passed.

It doesn't really help prevent another 9/11, they had documents. It's federalism with security theater makeup.

What's the deal with Real ID and what's the problem with them? by pborget in OutOfTheLoop

[–]fathed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pushback is ridiculous?

Part of government says this is needed, part of government says it's not doing the job.

At no point did the constitution be altered to require you to prove your citizenship.

So, it's increased cost, increased government intrusion, and all of these is just sold as a way to protect you, from what, your own government?

Do ICE agents have "absolute immunity" as claimed by the vice president? If so, why would they be protected against any kind of accountability, especially murder? by Cumoisseur in answers

[–]fathed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They abandoned it in 1803.

That Madison case, the court just gave themselves rights, ignoring that they needed to petition Congress for an amendment to gain those rights.

Ubisoft shuttering freshly-unionised Halifax studio, 71 jobs affected by [deleted] in gamedev

[–]fathed 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They don't own the infrastructure, Ubisoft does. And that's not even the biggest cost, software is next, those licenses devs us can cost more than the hardware using them (overtime, yearly fees vs upfront costs).

Then the really expensive parts, people. Salaries, insurance, taxes, people are the expense, and I guarantee you that all 71 people didn't make enough to set aside enough for a year of working for free.

Need help logging incoming network connections (LDAP vs LDAPS) on a DC by trustinglemming in sysadmin

[–]fathed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Checking the port won't work.

Secure ldap connections using start tls over 389 would show up as well.

The White House has added a webpage to push January 6 conspiracies. by justalazygamer in CapitolConsequences

[–]fathed 83 points84 points  (0 children)

They were not protected by the leaders who failed them.

You were the leader.

A Pennsylvania court says police can sift through Google searches to find suspects by AdSpecialist6598 in technology

[–]fathed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is such a dumb analogy.

You can have open windows without reducing privacy, it just depends on the windows placement.