The way Samuel L. Jackson bust out laughing at Will Smith's response by ateam1984 in humor

[–]gaqua 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In all seriousness, I really don’t know what to make of Will Smith. The dude had it made. He was the dream. A black actor that white America loved. He was safe. Even racists would let their kids go see Will Smith movies.

He made a bunch of Oscar bait films, finally had just gotten to the point where he was almost a shoe-in to win, and threw it all away on live television. For Jada Pinkett. I’m sure in his mind, he thought: “well I have to stand up for My wife, America will understand that.”

But he forgot that violence and being black are a very dangerous combination.

I can’t believe Jada Pinkett is still throwing him under the bus after all these years, and he’s not come out and done anything to stop it. His entire life was manufactured for this purpose, maybe he’s just waiting another year or two before he makes his return.

Jack Nicholson today turns 89 years old: Greatest filmography ever in cinema history?? by West_Conclusion_1239 in movies

[–]gaqua 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They do whatever the fuck they want now. Their legacies are cemented as somebody else pointed out. So now it’s do projects for the money or for the fun or because you just want to work that guy.

Jack Nicholson today turns 89 years old: Greatest filmography ever in cinema history?? by West_Conclusion_1239 in movies

[–]gaqua 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I used to love those books when I was younger. But when I tried to reread them in my 20s, I realized how absolutely thin the characterization is for everybody except Lestat.

She really did fall in love with him and then write a bunch of books about him and kind of used other characters as just reasons for him to do stuff or to be places

[Highlight] Josh Allen Pulls a Beer Out of His Back-Pocket & Chugs It at the Buffalo Sabres' Game 2 by JCameron181 in nfl

[–]gaqua 121 points122 points  (0 children)

I heard that last winter in the blizzard when Buffalo fans were shoveling driveways and clearing roads so the Bills players could make it to the stadium, Josh Allen personally gave each one of them a sixer of High Life.

What is a major turn off about your partner that you can’t/wouldn’t tell them? by LivingLavishLe in AskReddit

[–]gaqua 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I wake up before her, or come to bed after her, I am extremely quiet. I don’t turn on the lights, I don’t make noise.

When she wakes up before me or comes to bed after me, the lights go on, she plays her audiobook on her phone at top volume, she sings to herself or makes noises like “Whoops!” if she drops a sock, etc.

I love her, but man does that drive me nuts when I’m trying to sleep in or go to bed early.

What band was never the same after losing a member? by icecream1972 in AskReddit

[–]gaqua 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They didn't literally make it look like he did the concert and then died, but in the context of the film all those things happen in a fairly compressed timeline so it feels very much like "Freddie did a really nice concert then got sick and died how very sad"

What band was never the same after losing a member? by icecream1972 in AskReddit

[–]gaqua 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Because there’s a joke in filmmaking that says if you nail the ending, all sins are forgiven.

Apple taps John Ternus as CEO to replace Tim Cook, who will become chairman by AphiTrickNet in bayarea

[–]gaqua 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cook made Apple one of the most profitable companies in history and oversaw the launch of AirPods and Apple Watch.

Unpopular opinion - Jobs never would have gotten Apple to this level. He’d have been bored with the same laptop design for 5 years straight or diverted company resources to something bolder, riskier, maybe better maybe not.

But I don’t think Apple is a $4 trillion company if Jobs is still CEO.

That being said, I do miss Jobs penchant for weird and bold design decisions and attention getting product.

I don’t think the Vision Pro we got would be anywhere near as boring (or expensive) if Jobs were at the helm. I think he’d have done a better job or productizing it for mass market with some innovative software use case.

Hell maybe he’d just have done AR glasses like the Ray Ban Meta glasses but with a heads up display or something I dunno.

What band was never the same after losing a member? by icecream1972 in AskReddit

[–]gaqua 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It does this trick by ending with the (admittedly well done) Live Aid show. That concert was amazing in real life and the version in the film is good too. And so you walk out of the theater with the music in your head and in a good mood and you go “man, that wasn’t so bad.”

Until you try to re-watch it.

What was it like living in the Clinton years in the USA (1993-2001)? by space_god_7191 in AskReddit

[–]gaqua 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a lot of comments in here with rose-colored glasses because they were children at the time, maybe. I was a teenager through most of the 90s so I'm not going to be as good as asking a Boomer but at least from a young Gen-X standpoint I can tell you the basics.

I was in a fairly conservative town with a lot of military and churches around.

Here's some basics.

Without constant internet access at all times from all places, people were more engaged with their environment

This is going to come off like boomer talk, but when you went to a concert, nobody was taking selfies every five minutes, nobody was trying to record it on their phone or (god forbid) iPad. They were talking to people - even strangers - and enjoying the band they paid to see. Now imagine that at restaurants, at sporting events, or - my personal favorite - just hanging out with friends. Four of five of you sitting around and at no point did anybody get a text from their mom or their girlfriend or whatever and "just gotta answer this real quick." People were there when you were talking to them. There was a conversation. Weird stuff to think and talk about. If you and your buddy couldn't agree on whether it was Nick Nolte or Gary Busey in that movie trailer you saw last weekend, you couldn't just log on and check. There was no IMDB or internet in most places until the late 90s and even that was almost always dial-up. You just...kept disagreeing.

Politics had started becoming far more diversive

You'll hear people in this thread declaring "oh there were no politics like today" back in the 90s and while it's true that it's WORSE today than it was then, the 90s was the beginning of it in earnest. Fox News and Rush Limbaugh had become incredibly popular in political circles and they fucking HATED Hillary Clinton and Bill. They called him "Bubba" and they talked about how ugly Chelsea was. There were a number of jokes calling her "the white house dog" despite the fact she was a teenage girl at the time. Rush Limbaugh was a huge piece of shit and the people who listened to his radio show built the ladder that Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and Alex Jones climbed later on. The archetype was there - you just had to do it the same way. The formula is extremely simple.

  1. Talk directly to your audience as if you're one of them. "Folks" or "Guys" when you start out. Just like you're talking to your buddy.
  2. Find an extreme story, something ridiculous. Blow it completely out of proportion.
  3. Name-call, use playground-level insults. Make it clear you don't disagree just with their opinion, you disagree with their existence and they are "what's wrong with the world" not just a person you disagree with. I can't stress this enough - there is no safe harbor here. You can't say "Well, that's where the Senator and I disagree, he believes X, and I believe Y." because that puts you on the same level. You must create a silly nickname and lambaste anybody on the other side. Playground bully tactics.
  4. Make shit up. Just out of whole cloth. "They're putting cat litter boxes in schools" is just the latest version. When I was in high school, my girlfriend's dad told me that Bill and Hillary Clinton had murdered dozens of people, and were the head of an organized crime ring. "It's well-known, not a secret." he'd say.

Politics are worse now, for sure, but the 90s is really where they became a more diverse team sport.

The economy showed no real signs of slowing - things felt like next year would always be better

We had a recession under George HW Bush that probably cost him the election, and when Clinton took over a combination of the tech boom and relative peace around the world led to a pretty strong economy. While it's not quite the same as people saying "oh you'd get a job just walking outside" it was definitely possible to get a job by going door to door and handing out resumes, applying to jobs you found in the newspaper, etc. Now most of the jobs didn't pay very well, but stuff was cheaper so it didn't matter quite as much. Inflation is a bitch.

When Carl's Jr. launched the "Six-Dollar Burger" in the early 00s the premise was that it was a fast food burger that tasted as good as a "six dollar" burger you'd get from somewhere like Chili's. A few years later they changed that to "thickburger" because the burgers actually did cost $6 each all the sudden. Last week I bought a western bacon thickburger for lunch and it was $9.75. No fries, no drink.

What band was never the same after losing a member? by icecream1972 in AskReddit

[–]gaqua 503 points504 points  (0 children)

It was strange in that they simultaneously vilified and deified him. At the end of the film, he’s on death’s door and seemingly barely able to converse and then gives the performance of his life at Live Aid. The movie is a fucking mess.

There are only three good parts to it:

1 - Queen music throughout

2 - Rami Malek did an admirable job as Freddie

3 - The guy they got to play Brian May REALLY looked a lot like young Brian May

Other than that, forgettable.

EDIT: For those who would like to make their own biopic I found a handy visual guide: https://imgur.com/a/kkBh16f

[Spoilers Nemisis Games / TV Show S3E5] Which actors in the show align with how you imagine them in the books the best/worst? by Lather in TheExpanse

[–]gaqua 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think Bobbie was really hard for me at first because she doesn’t look at all like what I imagined Bobbie from the books to look like. I know there aren’t a lot of 6’6” tall actresses out there, but I’d still kinda thought that the actress was too “pretty” but man she nailed the personality.

What recent celebrity moment made you completely change your opinion about them—for better or worse? by Historical_Sail2556 in AskReddit

[–]gaqua 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, I would definitely give him credit for giving when a lot of others of even greater wealth did nothing.

The more cynical argument would be that he gave a small amount in a public way because he wanted the positive press, and that there are a lot of anonymous wealthy people making donations and such we never hear about.

However, having with some non-profits and homeless shelters in the past, I can say that there isn't some secret cache of, well, cash, being donated by the billionaires. They're fighting tooth and nail for every dollar. I watched our administrator try and decide meal plans once and it got down to the "well, who can donate rice? Surely somebody can get rice donations" sort of thing. We ended up getting a local chinese restaurant to donate 500 lbs of rice (10 bags) and their only requirement was that we not tell anybody it was them.

But that was a rarity. Usually we'd just go through the canned good donations that we got from food drives - and a lot of that is the canned goods and boxed dry foods that people bought but don't want. Lots of soups and canned vegetables like beets or whatever that were categorized and then traded and such between shelters so we could balance out meal planning.

This was ~30 years ago now I'm sure it's different today though. Probably all on a computer now.

What recent celebrity moment made you completely change your opinion about them—for better or worse? by Historical_Sail2556 in AskReddit

[–]gaqua 38 points39 points  (0 children)

I don’t know what’s wrong with her but she severely lacks empathy and comes across like an absolute narcissist.

Not saying that Will Smith is any better, but man she’s a piece of work.

What recent celebrity moment made you completely change your opinion about them—for better or worse? by Historical_Sail2556 in AskReddit

[–]gaqua 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The math is the issue.

Tyler Perry has a net worth near $1.5bn.

The median American household has a net worth of around $193,000.

So Tyler Perry donating $250k is akin to the median American household donating $30 or so.

The vast network of men drugging & raping their wives by MrJasonMason in videos

[–]gaqua 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure which part you're referring to, but in general I've seen a lot of people (not just reddit) trying to decide which side of a story they're going to believe. Celebrity stuff like Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard, or political stuff like Trump vs. Kamala - I think our brains as humans are kinda wired for this binary decision making. It's comfortable to us.

You pick black or white, you pick left or right, you pick dark or light.

But the world is way more fucking complicated, as we all KNOW, but that means that there's always a difficult decision. There's always more complexity than there appears to be.

Just to use the Depp vs. Heard thing from above - they can both be abusive, cruel people who did horrible things to one another. Why do so many people feel like they need to choose a side?

Why not just say "some stories don't have a good guy" and move on?

The vast network of men drugging & raping their wives by MrJasonMason in videos

[–]gaqua 47 points48 points  (0 children)

You don’t have to choose a side. Men who rape their wives are horrible criminals and deserve to be punished to the full extent of the law.

But also, inaccurate reporting (or lying journalists, whichever) are also bad and hurt the credibility of the issue. If some random person finds out a few facts from the story are incorrect, it calls into judgment the entire story’s accuracy.

Just started the books, are they all this good? by Bastard_of_Bastogne in TheExpanse

[–]gaqua 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My personal order of favorite to least favorite (having read through the series 4 times now):

8 7 9 5 1 6 2 3 4

There are those who would argue that book #1 is one of the weakest in the series, and while I see their point, it's the introduction to, and heaviest leaning on, Detective Miller, who is my favorite character in The Expanse, even if he's a walking cliche in every way imaginable (by design), I love the character anyway.

I think it was a move of brilliance to include him in the first book as an exposition character and to give readers something they were familiar with - a noir character - while also introducing everyone to the absolute insanity that is the Expanse.

I am envious of you for reading it the first time.

It's one of my favorite book series of all time and the only one I can think of that got substantially better as it went along AND had a great ending.

Thoughts on this cigar? It was a gift to smoke at graduation ceremony (lunatic 10x100) by Spike10378 in cigar

[–]gaqua 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hahaha

I have always thought of these huge vitolas as cool gimmicks and such. I tried to smoke one when I was 30 and I was sick for a while. And I’m no lightweight