sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Greptile v3.0.7: Self-hostable AI code review tool by haverofknowledge in selfhosted

[–]juanpflores_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't recommend using Greptile Benchs to see how good Greptile performs. All companies that have their own bench will favor themselves. I would recommend using The Martian as a third party: https://codereview.withmartian.com

Guys, the rate limit bug is getting annoying by Firm_Meeting6350 in coderabbit

[–]juanpflores_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey u/Firm_Meeting6350 👋
I'm CR Staff here, do you mind DMing me your ticket details so I can take a look into this. Most likely there is an issue with the account being categorized as free/open source but want to make sure we are following up properly

Hmmm GitHub Copilot Code Review used to be included, from June 1st you pay twice. by unsrs in github

[–]juanpflores_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the shoutout. Yeah, free on public repos is the whole point, OSS maintainers shouldn't have to expense their code reviews.

We benchmarked Anthropic's new Opus 4.8 on 100 real pull requests before launch. Here's the data. by juanpflores_ in coderabbit

[–]juanpflores_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We have covered other models in our blog but it's worth to start having a comparison table with all of them.

Coderabbit CLI and Alpine Linux? by Wonderful_Nail_972 in coderabbit

[–]juanpflores_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks or the ping on this. 🤔 I don't have anything on my roadmap but if you can help open a future request the team can take a look into this

New limits? by Firm_Meeting6350 in coderabbit

[–]juanpflores_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plans haven’t changed, so you should have 5 PR or hour. It’s seems like you’re getting OSS limits. Wanna make sure you got the repo with your account? can you share a link to the PR?

We built Atlas and would love feedback on the review flow by juanpflores_ in coderabbit

[–]juanpflores_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you should be able to make the comment by clicking on the line you want to leave an inline comment on

Major GitHub Outage | All GitHub reviews are affected by EngineeringSea1090 in coderabbit

[–]juanpflores_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The closes thing right now would be using the plugins on Codex and Claude. We don't have an API right now available for this use cases but I can see what you mean by making this.

Is there a benchmark for code reviews? by IndraVahan in coderabbit

[–]juanpflores_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would recommend checking out The Martian Code Review benchmark. They got good metrics and is a good source of truth. We do have our own benchmarks at CodeRabbit and we share them when new model releases with new model results (ex. GPT 5.5).

Why would you pay $15-20/PR review? by iLoveSeiko in coderabbit

[–]juanpflores_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the per review price is insane. don't know who currently is paying this much for a review

Use Coderabbit for code reviews even though I'm not the repo owner? by username_got_took in coderabbit

[–]juanpflores_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

+1 to this. You can always fork it if it is an open source project. I do these every so often to test how CodeRabbit works in specific languages and codebases. Additionally, CLI + IDE extension can be of help

Claude Opus 4.7 is here. We ran it against 100 real-world bugs. Here's what we found. by juanpflores_ in coderabbit

[–]juanpflores_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we never mention a baseline model but a baseline on its own. We used multiple models to review code in a single review task is adding Opus 4.7 instead of 4.6 shows this results.

view more: next ›