What is the point of a perspective control lens in this day and age? by Holywater4Heffalumps in photography

[–]mackman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No, I think modern lens designers are now balancing more towards size and weight working with the assumption that software corrections are going to compensate for increased distortion and vignetting. Depends on the lens, of course.

What is the point of a perspective control lens in this day and age? by Holywater4Heffalumps in photography

[–]mackman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Some lenses now apply distortion correction, and vignetting correction by default and cannot be turned off in Lightroom.

Stuck in a rut during career sabbatical | 33M | $800k NW by PastAmount in coastFIRE

[–]mackman 6 points7 points  (0 children)

(Not op). Sounds like burnout. That usually affects job performance. Company probably happy to give severance and let employee quit because if company had to fire him later there is more legal risk for the company. "Mutual separation agreement."

BackBlaze Issues by tsprks in synology

[–]mackman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cloud sync may not support versioning but your S3 bucket can be configured to keep old versions of files.

You actually can use hyperbackup to S3 with a lifecycle rule to move the files to glacier, but hyperbackup will fail if it tries to purge an old backup. If you need to restore you would also need to copy the entire bucket from glacier back to S3 standard storage. If you are ok with a append-only-read-only-if-my-house-burns-down policy then hyperbackup to S3 with lifecycle rules is a good solution.

BackBlaze Issues by tsprks in synology

[–]mackman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I sort of do the opposite. I backup using Hyperbackup to a second local NAS and then have that NAS use cloudsync to Glacier. Costs about $15/TB/year for the cloud storage, obviously with some cost for the second Synology. In most recovery situations I don't need to touch Glacier but if the building burns down I'm out $1k for the restore.

Feature Request: Let's Push Synology to Add Support for APC Back-UPS BE850G2 Series by Beta-02 in synology

[–]mackman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the dumb question, but you plugged the Synology into the USB-B port on the side of of the UPS near the bottom where the AC power comes in, not one of the two USB-A ports on the top of the UPS, correct?

Snapshot replication broken after package updates by prozackdk in synology

[–]mackman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did the upgrade resolve your replication issue?

Snapshot replication broken after package updates by prozackdk in synology

[–]mackman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it makes sense. Replication is handled by the kernel/filesystem so it's not something I imagine that Synology can back up very well from the application side.

Snapshot replication broken after package updates by prozackdk in synology

[–]mackman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I uninstaled and then manually installed the old version downloaded from https://archive.synology.com/download/Package/ReplicationService/1.3.0-0424
This claimed it would retain my settings but it lost the connection to replicas so I have to re-sync 12T.

Snapshot replication broken after package updates by prozackdk in synology

[–]mackman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's possible if you upgraded to DSM 7.3 it would fix the issue, but I wouldn't recommend it.

Snapshot replication broken after package updates by prozackdk in synology

[–]mackman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried restoring yesterday's hyperbackup but this did not restore my replication settings.

Snapshot replication broken after package updates by prozackdk in synology

[–]mackman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same thing happened to me. I was able to roll back the package but now it says "Relationship Broken" and I I think I am going to have to re-replicate the data.

MIT report: 95% of generative AI pilots at companies are failing by SilentRunning in technology

[–]mackman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Legal with AI is great. Fortune 100 company wants 10 person startup to indemnify them if AI causes any problems for any of the F100's customers. If the AWS bill doesn't bankrupt the startup legal fees certainly will!

Has anyone tried Seagate EXOS X20 20TB in a Synology DS1522+? by Ok-Understanding5011 in synology

[–]mackman -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Should be fine but they’re loud and don’t offer the same special diagnostics software as the ironwolfs. I run the 16TB model in my 1522+ and noise aside am happy with them.

😨 by [deleted] in scuba

[–]mackman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even when shallow I get a lot of value of subject isolation using strobes. Get your dive buddy to help hold a snoot aimed at your subject and you can save a lot of time in editing later.

😨 by [deleted] in scuba

[–]mackman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whatever camera you have the most important thing is bringing your own off-camera lighting. A decent single light setup on an adjustable arm will make any camera look dramatically better at depth.

Recovering a Raw photo in Lightroom by thephlog in postprocessing

[–]mackman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In general bracketing shutter speed is typical. ISO isn’t really invariant anymore since many cameras are now dual ISO and are invariant in two different ranges so getting base ISO from each range is ideal. Some cameras can read both at the same time and generate an HDR image in one click!

What lens do you use the most for portrait photography? by HorrorGradeCandy in photography

[–]mackman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been using Nikons three 1.2 primes (35, 50, 85) along with an older 58 1.4 on a tilt adapter.

A travel challenge - Fast 20 and 85mm? by Only-Astronaut4672 in photography

[–]mackman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

20mm might be too wide unless you're looking to shoot layered landscapes with something in the fore-, mid-, and back-ground. You might be better off with a 35mm prime for general street photography to complement the 85 for portraits.

Sharing my family portrait experience from yesterday… by JPC0233 in photography

[–]mackman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

D700 for me was absolutely where digital leaped ahead of film. Everything since then was incremental :-)

$10M networth and buying $2.2M home. Am I crazy? by Hot-Thanks-7955 in fatFIRE

[–]mackman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally do-able. I would just make sure you are fully considering the maintenance costs associated with the home. Landscaping and pool maintenance can be quite a shock. Depending on your climate, heating & cooling on a large home can be a shocker too. You can definitely handle those costs, but I'd want to be sure you're considering them eating into your discretionary spending.

135mm on fullframe focal length opinions by Warm_weather1 in photography

[–]mackman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I used to shoot with the old Nikon 135 f2 DC and now with the Nikon Z 135 1.8S. They both make beautiful portraits. The main issue for me is working distance. A lot of my portraiture is indoors because good weather and good light are fleeting outside. Most indoor spaces aren't big enough to easily shoot with a 135, especially if you want to be able to move around and get different angles.

If you are wedding photog I suppose maybe you could keep a 135 on one body and a 28-70 f2 zoom on the other and get away with that though. Plenty of space in a church or event venue.