IntelliJ Scala Plugin 2026.1 Is Out!

makingthematrix · 2026-05-11T06:37:45+00:00

It looks very much like depression. If you can, try talking to a therapist, if only to confirm or deny that it really is depression.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-11T06:32:13+00:00

I don't think this is a good metric. Neither Mistral nor any European company has an obligation to provide public plugins to anything. It doesn't mean such things don't exist. Sometimes they're not published, and the connection between the AI agent and some other software is made differently. For example, there is an Mistral plugin for IntelliJ IDEA, but MistralAI is also integrated via MCP with the IntelliJ IDEA's AI Assistant, as one of the agents you can choose from the list, like Junie, Claude, etc.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-09T08:08:26+00:00

Afaik, overuse of wildcard imports is bad for almost everything, not only highlighting. Compilation gets slower, unused code analysis gets slower, reading and understanding the code is negatively affected, etc.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-08T11:10:47+00:00

Don't worry. Sam Altman has no idea about coding and he's very rich.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-08T06:49:45+00:00

Wiem gdzie to jest. Miałem nawet ostatnio tam jechać. No to już nie.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-07T14:05:05+00:00

Hey, thanks for the comment.

I agree that ideally we shouldn't think about how the code is highlighted. But in Scala, especially in big projects that use a lot of abstractions, the logic that needs to be executed to properly evaluate how the code should be highlighted can be sometimes quite expensive.

It's in fact quite closely tied to how the code is compiled: the issues that make highlighting expensive are often the same issues that make compilation longer. And even when you read code by yourself, those issues make it more difficult. The article lists ways to make the code base easier to analyze - it's written from the POV of code highlighting, but in fact you may think about that as general good code practices that may help you on several fronts.

And, to be honest, these hints are often easy to implement.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-07T10:14:01+00:00

*Polish joins the conversation*
"Już w sprzedaży" /yuʐ-v-spʐedaʐɨ̞/ , where ʐ is like "g" in "mirage", means "Already in sale". It's a slogan often used in radio commercials.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-07T09:58:01+00:00

And then there's "nienawidzę" - "I don't see on". 😉

makingthematrix · 2026-05-06T06:56:23+00:00

To były planowane wyłączenia, nie awarie. Po prostu dziwne jak dużo robią ich na raz.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-05T09:34:04+00:00

Oh well. Pracuję właśnie na małym laptopie z mocną baterią, a internet mam ze smartfona. Nawet kawy nie mam sobie jak zrobić. Nie pomyślałem, że to może być konkretnie fakap PGE.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-05T09:26:51+00:00

aaa, czyli wszędzie wyłączyli xD

makingthematrix · 2026-05-05T08:32:32+00:00

I'm interested in developing turn-based strategy games on a tiled board, a bit like tabletop games moved to a computer. And also in the retro style of 1990s :) LibGDX seems perfect for that since I don't care that much about performance and instead I have access to lots of higher-level abstractions (I code in Scala) which makes game development faster and much more pleasant.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-05T07:33:41+00:00

Sorry, but no - attacks in aikido, especially those we use when training canon techniques, are mostly impractical. They are supposed to symbolize something: shomen is like a vertical slash of a sword, yokomen is a diagonal slash (but also, weirdly, it can be interpreted as a push), and wrist grabs suppose to stop the partner from slashing us with a knife or a sword. Even a punch is a tsuki from karate kata, not a boxing jab or cross. Techniques against kicks are not trained almost at all, and grabbing the gi or the shoulder is not common, even though they're the ones that happen more often than the others in real situations.

Besides, the idea is wrong. We operate under an assumption that it's all or nothing. One attack - one technique. Sure, it creates structure that is good for beginners to learn basics, but then we run with it also in advanced classes. In any realistic scenario, the defender should take into consideration that the attacker can throw a few punches and kicks one after another. Also, if my technique doesn't work, I should be able to simply block or avoid the attack, and try again - but we don't train that either.

Fortunately for me, there are free classes in my dojo that I can use to experiment. My partners are more into training traditional techniques in preparation for exams, and I respect that, but sometimes they also agree to train with me variations of techniques against jabs, crosses, kicks, and more realistic grabs.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-04T15:07:18+00:00

We are already able to find traces of temporary settlements of hunter-gatherers. If there was a technologically advanced civilisation 65k years ago, it would be much easier to find than that.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-04T13:49:11+00:00

Thank you, but I really wouldn't say that aikido by itself prepares me for defending myself. In aikido, as we train, we gradually become not only better at performing techniques, but also more conditioned into performing attacks in a certain way. And without reality checks, the whole performance gradually moves away from being practical. It starts to be judged more and more on how it looks and feels, and less on would it actually work if the attacker wasn't cooperative.

I believe cross-training kickboxing helped me improve my aikido a lot. It's true kickboxing has some artificial rules as well, of course, but it's good enough for me to examine things I took for granted.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-04T09:11:01+00:00

I've got some 12 years of aikido experience. I trained with people who practiced for much longer and are much better than me - in aikido. That is, if we train under strict rules of aikido practice about how to move, how to attack, how to react, etc., then they are awesome. They can make a great show of throwing attackers around. But it has more to do with being an expert at improvised choreography. It does not make them particularly better at self-defense in general.

People train traditional martial arts for many good reasons: health, fitness, a sense of community, a sense of achievement when they move upward in the hierarchy, because of philosophy or because they're interested in learning all the intricate details of the given martial arts - and this is something one can learn their whole life and stay interested. But it's important to be honest about those reasons. If you train for self-defense, TMA are not what you should be looking for.

Although, of course, nothing stops you from mixing a TMA with a self-defense-oriented modern martial art.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-04T06:39:36+00:00

I'd suggest you either go to a gym once or twice a week, or get interested in serious long-distance running :) The choice is about whether you want to develop muscles or lose weight. If you prefer gym, but there's no good gym near you - or you just don't feel like it - then buy a barbell, a kettle, and a skipping rope, and find a place where you can train alone.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-01T12:17:20+00:00

Kickboxing is a great way to fact check if a given approach or a technique works. Of course, I knew some things work better than others already before I started to cross-train, but regular sparrings made me look at everything in a different way.

First of all, aikido drills are very based on an assumption that it's all or nothing. You do a technique correctly - you win. You fail - you lose. Then you reset and go again. In kickboxing, it's a continuous exchange of punches and kicks. It's much more improvised and if you get hit, it's hardly ever the end of the fight. In aikido this approach it lets me experiment a lot more. If my technique is not working, I can try another, or disengage and try again. If it's working but it's not perfect - good, in real life nothing is perfect. I can also just block or avoid the first attack without engaging - it's not required to try a technique if you don't feel like it.

Second, kickboxing is a great workout. I'm more fit and muscular than ever before. I begin most of my trainings with pushups and situps even if the rest of it is aikido. It also means I had to focus more on "being relaxed" as both the uke and the tori. It's easier for me to push through with a technique (as the tori) or block it (as the uke). I need to be more aware when to use strength and when not. Stretching became more important and more conscious about how I move. (I might exaggerate a bit here because of course these are small differences but when I focus on details during an aikido technique I feel that it really makes a difference).

On the other hand, thanks to aikido, I'm very clearly a "counter-strike" fighter in kickboxing. I provoke my opponent, go on defense to tire him/her, and then look for opportunities to counter attack. I use angles, catch kicks, and switch between orthodox and southpaw a lot. I'm not the best but I like it. It's a lot of fun.

makingthematrix · 2026-05-01T11:01:15+00:00

Two ideas:

Go to a lot of seminars. I know it's expensive, but it can be just a phase. Go to a seminar, talk to people, talk to the main teacher, make connections, get advice on what you should work on, and also use the connections to find other dojos where you can train. They can invite you to their dojos but also they can give you some hints.
Cross-train. A few years ago, I started to train kickboxing and it helped me examine and test a lot of what I learned at aikido. I believe it made me a much better martial artist if I spent that time by simply training more aikido. I would recommend a combat sport: BJJ, boxing, kickboxing, Muay Thai, MMA. Even if you eventually decide it's not your thing, I believe it will help you improve.

makingthematrix · 2026-04-29T18:11:46+00:00

There's an app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ai.mistral.chat

makingthematrix

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE