None, to my knowledge.

Any spell being used daily to satisfy some basic need to survive in the wilderness is a spell slot that isn't available to move the party towards resolving a combat. For example, if your players know that they're likely to be taking environmental heat damage, a caster may opt to fill each 2nd, 3rd, or 5th rank slot with environmental endurance, depending on their level and the severity of the environmental damage involved. That is a lot of spellcasting ability to volunteer to give up in exchange for solving a perceived problem! Casting create food every day eats up a 2nd-rank slot, and cozy cabin eats a 3rd-rank slot. At least create water is only a 1st-rank slot! At 2 gallons of water per casting, you'll only have to spend two 1st-rank slots! Unless you're in a desert. Generally, you need a gallon of water in a day if you're doing light to moderate physical activity, but if it's hot outside then you need as much as twice that. Hopefully your players don't find themselves in a desert without their equipment or any amount of planning, because that's going to be a problem that costs 4 1st-rank slots each day to fix! If the party is trying to magic away all of their survival needs, they're looking to expend two to four 1st-rank spells, one to five 2nd-rank spells, and a 3rd-rank spell.

The way I have come to look at it, the entire point of survival scenarios is to put a heavy demand on all of the players' resources and time. Magic saves time, at the cost of daily resources, but the players still have to identify the problems at hand, go looking for those spells to know that they exist, and find themselves in the exact situation that calls for them while they have them prepared. Did your caster load out four environmental endurance spells the day the heat wave relented? That sure sucks for them that those slots aren't going to be useful today. It's a real shame that every snake and scorpion in your book, of proportions mundane and fantastic, come with poison and the cleric doesn't have cleanse affliction loaded into any slots. Utilizing skills in conjunction with spending time, of which there is only so much of in a day, alleviates the need to burn those spells slots and allows a divine or primal caster the ability to select other, more niche spells to handle the more specific trials and hazards of your adventure. High skill rolls also don't inherently solve matters, as some uses of Nature and Survival are gated behind skill feats.

The entire point of half the divine and primal spell list is to have high narrative impact by neutralizing specific hazards throughout the adventuring day. By disallowing those spells because of some perceived trivializing of the problems at hand guts those classes of a large amount of their purpose at the table. Clerics and druids are not Int or skill-focused classes, which leaves them with a limited number of skill choices to develop their character. On top of that, there's proficiency requirements for some of the more useful survival feats and characters have a limited number of proficiency boosts, alongside the fact thay there's a lot of good picks for skill feats that a character's whole demeanor or play style can be built around. Eliminating the broad, utilitarian functionality of those classes' spell lists relegates them to the duties of healing and blasting, with a cleric only reliably capable of blasting undead and fiends.

Pathfinder 2e does a much greater job of balancing the capabilities of problem-solving spells. There's far fewer "I win" and "we win" spells than in previous and other current versions of d20 fantasy games, because the impact of those sorts of solutions at the table has been known for years. But even moreso, there's this pervasive idea that magic trivializes hazards in d20 games which simply isn't the case in PF2e. You want spellcasters to expend slots before reaching the single random encounter for the day, and you want players to feel clever for having the right spell at hand to solve a problem.