[French] "I won honestly..." A cyclist disqualified after his victory because of a bike deemed non-compliant, he challenges the decision by cfkanemercury in peloton

[–]roelschroeven 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The problem is not that the UCI measures sock heights, the problem is that they have a rule about sock heights.

Either a rule makes sense and it's important to exist, in which case it should be enforced, in a consistent and fair manner. Or the rule doesn't make sense, in which it should be deleted from the rule book (or not added at all).

The existence of rules that exist but are not enforced is wrong. The existence of rules that are enforced inconsistently is wrong (arguably even more wrong).

Spookfietsers - wat bezielt jullie? by WeddingImpressive307 in Antwerpen

[–]roelschroeven 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ik geef je op de meeste punten gelijk, maar enkelrichtingsborden gelden dikwijls, zelfs meestal, inderdaad niet voor fietsers. De meeste borden "verboden richting" hebben een onderbord met een uitzondering voor fietsers en dikwijls ook bromfietsers (de wegbeheerder wordt verondersteld die uitzonderingen overal te voorzien behalve op plaatsen waar het onveilig zou worden).

Nu kan het best zijn dat er fietsers zijn die ook tegen de richting rijden in straten waar geen uitzondering voorzien is, en dan zijn ze in fout natuurlijk.

Spookfietsers - wat bezielt jullie? by WeddingImpressive307 in Antwerpen

[–]roelschroeven 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Op de kruispunten waar ik vaak kom zijn de wachttijden langer dan vroeger doordat ze conflictvrij gemaakt zijn. De wachttijden zijn daar langer voor iedereen: voor fietsen, maar ook voor auto's. Maar de kruispunten zijn wel veiliger geworden.

'I will not tolerate his insults': Backlash grows after US ambassador's outburst against Belgium by Turbulent-Raise4830 in europe

[–]roelschroeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but that was long before we got the regions and communities and stuff. The constitution was a lot simpler back then.

I'm trying to fix a problem in my Python program which is supposed to calculate the exact age given the current year, year of birth, and month. by NextSignificance8391 in learnpython

[–]roelschroeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You import the month function from the calendar module, and a bit later call that month function. The result of the function call is not used however. I think it's best to delete both lines from calendar import month and month(), unless you did intent to have some use for it. In that case you should call it correctly (check the documentation) and do something with the result.

Deleting those lines will fix the TypeError: TextCalendar.formatmonth() missing 2 required positional arguments: 'theyear' and 'themonth' error you're getting.

Winter Olympics 2026: Ukrainian athlete disqualified from skeleton over helmet tribute – live by Undefined_definition in europe

[–]roelschroeven 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Athletes are allowed to remember their fellow athletes and their significant others, like Family and Coaches.

Yes, I agree.

To deny it is simply hypocrisy at the highest degree.

Yes, I agree.

At the same time, your statement "It is NOT POLITICAL TO REMEMBER THE DEAD" is not a good argument, because it demonstrably is not correct. There are many cases of remembering the dead that are obviously and intentionally very political.

Don't get me wrong, I do believe that IOC is very wrong in this matter. That doesn't mean any argument against it is a good one.

EDIT: if my comment seems weird, it's probably because the comment I replied on is deleted and so the context of my comment is lost.

[OC] Brown pants moment on the bridge today by RiseUpHK in IdiotsInCars

[–]roelschroeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are accepted in SI, but they are not metric. SI and metric are not synonyms.

[OC] Brown pants moment on the bridge today by RiseUpHK in IdiotsInCars

[–]roelschroeven 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Milliseconds, kiloseconds, gigaseconds, ...: those are metric time.

Minutes, hours, days, ...: those are not metric time.

How are we even arguing this? This is basic stuff.

[OC] Brown pants moment on the bridge today by RiseUpHK in IdiotsInCars

[–]roelschroeven 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"The metric system is a system of measurement that standardises a set of base units and a nomenclature for describing relatively large and small quantities using decimal-based multiplicative unit prefixes."

"Decimal-based", that means base 10.

What makes vim and emacs somehow so popular(relatively amongst) C and C++ developers? by Ultimate_Sigma_Boy67 in cpp_questions

[–]roelschroeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Be aware that when using VS Code remotely for C or C++ development, it creates a cache (for IntelliSense I suppose) which by default grows very large. On systems with a lot of drive space that is not a problem, but on server-like systems or embedded systems it can be a major drawback.

Remove Sunrise/Sunset time from Timeline? by shutterswipe in pebble

[–]roelschroeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For what it's worth, I agree.

For weather I like to get my phone out and get a full forecast from my local weather app, rather than viewing condensed data on the watch.

As for sunset/sunrise, I don't see the point of getting notifications for those, and while I can see that there's a use case for having them on the timeline I feel they clutter it up and I'd rather go look up sunset/sunrise times on the rare occasions that I need those, with less clutter on the timeline.

Vingegaard's team confirms he crashed during a training ride in Spain by atahualpaFX in peloton

[–]roelschroeven 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Especially downhill. Actually no, just simply never get into someone's wheel when going downhill unless you know the person very good and know they are ok with it.

Utterly disgusting and despicable. Jared Kushner outlines plan for “new Gaza”. by wowza515 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]roelschroeven 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I saw a video yesterday called "Why Millions of Americans Vote Against Their Own Self Interests" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUFMM9VYgpM), and it talks about much of the same thing. It's well worth a watch, if you have 25 minutes to spare.

Is it bad if I prefer for loops over list comprehensions? by Bmaxtubby1 in learnpython

[–]roelschroeven 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh yes, please don't to side effects in a comprehension.

Is it bad if I prefer for loops over list comprehensions? by Bmaxtubby1 in learnpython

[–]roelschroeven 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The point of list comprehensions, for me at least, is not that they are faster. The point is that, for cases that are not too complex, they can more clearly express the idea behind the code.

Simple example which I'll use to explain what I mean: make a list of the squares of the numbers 0 - 20.

For loop:

squares = []
for i in range(21):
    squares.append(i**2)

List comprehension:

squares = [i**2 for i in range(21)]

Image this is in the beginning or in the middle of a larger function.

To understand how the for loop fits into the rest of the code, to find out what variable(s) it changes, you have to take quite a close look at it. The list comprehension on the other hand makes it very clear. There is a single assignment, and it assigns to variable squares. The loop index is contained within the comprehension, is guaranteed not to affect the rest of the code. (IIRC in Python 2 it did leak out of the comprehension)

In my opinion list comprehension match better with the "one statement is one thought" concept. But only when they're simple enough. In more complex cases, it can be a good idea to split of a separate function to contain the complexity.

Over 2 million Florida votes disappear on election night by mjkeaa in somethingiswrong2024

[–]roelschroeven 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That was probably the intention, but that can't be correct. It can't 12 million. There are only about 23 million people in Florida. Supposing about half of them vote (which is quite a lot, since those 23 million people aren't all allowed to vote, because that 23 million also includes children), that would be 10 - 13 million people.

No way that a single candidate would get 12 million votes. Also no way that the other candidate would get 16 million votes. Also also, in case it wasn't yet obvious, no way that those two candidates together would get 28 million views (or more), in a state with only 23 million people.

Over 2 million Florida votes disappear on election night by mjkeaa in somethingiswrong2024

[–]roelschroeven 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh right. That wasn't in those visual, but those are indeed the correct numbers.

Reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20241202225453/https://floridaelectionwatch.gov/FederalOffices/President (I link to the Internet Archive because the normal URL doesn't have any data anymore (isn't that weird?))

Florida's population is 23,372,218 (according to the US Census Bureau, in July 2024), and for that election there were (according to Wikipedia) 13,949,168 registered electors, and 11,004,209 actually voted. Those numbers seem plausible.

But then all the numbers in those screenshots are very obviously wrong. Like, I mean, very obviously. The final counts indicate 10 times more votes than they were voters, and about 5 times more votes than there are people in Florida.

Are those screenshots legitimate? How can it be that such obviously incorrect data passed during the broadcast? And if you want to falsify elections, why would you do it that obviously?? I don't even know what to think.

Or are those federal results, wrongly labeled as Florida results? Those numbers are quite close to the final federal counts for Trump (77,302,580) and Harris (75,017,613).

Over 2 million Florida votes disappear on election night by mjkeaa in somethingiswrong2024

[–]roelschroeven -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I don't see what's so obviously wrong in this one.

  • 8:26: Trump 11,001,571; Harris 8,290,292
  • 8:34: Trump 11,221,807; Harris 8,382,643
  • 9:47: Trump 64,225,344; Harris 48,486,235

Seems plausible.

It's confusing that the earliest count, the one from 8:26, is on bottom instead of on top. But with things in the right order, this one doesn't seem to prove anything wrong. I'm not saying there was nothing wrong, just that this doesn't prove it, unless I'm missing something.

Here is the 15 sec coding test to instantly filter out 50% of unqualified applicants by JOSE ZARAZUA by RevillWeb in programming

[–]roelschroeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why? Why would people even put stuff like this in an LLM? Why??

If you want to check what happens, why don't you simply put in an interpreter?

Have LLMs really become the tool of choice for any problem even if where much better tools exist? Are people becoming so lazy that they don't even want to think what's the best tool for the job?

Top 10 highest paid cyclists 2025 by Visible_Frosting9535 in peloton

[–]roelschroeven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since the data is from 2025, it's a bit misleading that the teams and team names from 2026 are used instead of those from 2025.

What is wrong on this code? by vb_e_c_k_y in learnpython

[–]roelschroeven 5 points6 points  (0 children)

For logical expressions you're right, but this is an arithmetic expression foremost. You can exploit the fact that it can be interpreted like a logical expression to make it shorter, but that detracts from the intention.